Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

M$ Needs More than Tabbed Browsing for IE

Filed under

Microsoft's Internet Explorer Product Unit Manager Dean Hachamovitch recently confirmed in his weblog that Internet Explorer 7.0 would have tabbed browsing integration, a feature that's also available in Mozilla's Firefox browser. One of the many reasons Firefox has become popular is due to tabbed browsing. It was a different concept that let users open numerous windows in a single parent window. It's useful, it's popular, and it works. But I don't see how this is a major feature in need of promotion. While Hachamovitch didn't intentionally promote it himself, he did confirm it as if this is the next thing in browsers.

I am not saying that Microsoft is wrong in porting over features that have made other browsers a success, but what I really want to see in Internet Explorer is security and Microsoft's determination to continue to update Internet Explorer even if there's no "real" competition. Sure, having additional features in Internet Explorer will help tremendously, but what made Firefox a huge success is its correct code structure, a set industry standard that it follows and the foundation's rapid response when it comes to fixing security holes. Microsoft needs to do the exact same thing if it wants to gain back its lost market share.

Since Microsoft already has a dire reputation of ignoring certain security vulnerabilities and never releasing a patch in a timely manner, if at all, it needs to regain trust of its users. In today's times where security is a key to any successful product, especially that's used by millions of computer users throughout the world; Microsoft must pay attention to even the minute details when it comes to securing nine out of ten computers with Windows operating system.

In addition to that, Microsoft has a tendency to ignore products once the company has eliminated its competition. Its Internet Explorer is a fine example of that. Until Firefox came along, none of the other browsers had challenged Internet Explorer much; therefore, Microsoft never paid close attention to its security or tried to add useful features to it. They pretty much ignored it. After Firefox came along, that all changed. Not only did people start reporting more security issues with Internet Explorer, Microsoft also dedicated a team to focus on its browser. It was only after Firefox threatened Internet Explorer's market share did Microsoft made the announcement of an upcoming version that would fix a majority of such issues and would be updated to meet industry standards for browsers. This version will be the upcoming Internet Explorer 7.0.

After Microsoft has gained the trust with the browser's security, features and a promise to continually update Internet Explorer, it needs to make sure that Internet Explorer is well maintained structurally. Since Internet Explorer has been the most popular browser in the world, many webmasters practically designed their website solely for this particular browser. And since Internet Explorer was lenient on its coding style, it led web developers to be relaxed about the way they constructed websites, which resulted in numerous "broken" sites in Firefox and other browsers. Microsoft has the ability to define industry standards in a correct way, so why don't they do it?

There are numerous other things that Microsoft can do to make Internet Explorer a competitive browser functionally and feature wise. What really intrigues me is that Microsoft only seems interested in eliminating competition, and not catering to its users. Microsoft clearly has the resources to define the software industry, but they choose not to do that. I am all for the goal of eliminating competition, but they need do that with better products and continued support to their customers. Microsoft can learn a lot from Firefox and the things that have made it a success. The company will certainly need more than tabbed browsing in 7.0 to get knowledgeable users to switch back over to Internet Explorer.


More in Tux Machines

Games for GNU/Linux

Linux/FOSS Events

  • CloudNativeCon Unites Leaders in Open Source, Container and Cloud Native Tech
    Today’s cloud native ecosystem is growing at an incredibly rapid pace – as new technologies are continuously introduced and current applications are ever-evolving. Taking the lead in bringing together the industry’s top developers, end users, and vendors, the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) hosts critical components of the cloud native software stacks including Kubernetes, Prometheus, and OpenTracing and serves as a neutral home for collaboration. To help spread cloud native practices and technology across the world, CNCF is hosting CloudNativeCon to bring together leading contributors in cloud native applications and computing, containers, microservices, central orchestration processing, and more November 8-9 in Seattle.
  • Spark on Kubernetes at Spark Summit EU
    I’ll be speaking about Spark on Kubernetes at Spark Summit EU this week. The main thesis of my talk is that the old way of running Spark in a dedicated cluster that is shared between applications makes sense when analytics is a separate workload. However, analytics is no longer a separate workload — instead, analytics is now an essential part of long-running data-driven applications. This realization motivated my team to switch from a shared Spark cluster to multiple logical clusters that are co-scheduled with the applications that depend on them.
  • valgrind 3.12.0 and Valgrind@Fosdem
    Valgrind 3.12.0 was just released with lots of exciting improvements. See the release notes for all the details. It is already packaged for Fedora 25.
  • Valgrind-3.12.0 is available
    3.12.0 is a feature release with many improvements and the usual collection of bug fixes. This release adds support for POWER ISA 3.0, improves instruction set support on ARM32, ARM64 and MIPS, and provides support for the latest common components (kernel, gcc, glibc). There are many smaller refinements and new features. The release notes below give more details.
  • Meet writers, moderators, and interviewees at All Things Open

Security News

Red Hat and Fedora

  • Diamanti and Red Hat Announce OpenShift Commons Webinar Revealing CI/CD DevOps Breakthroughs With Container Converged Infrastructure
  • UKCloud Creates an Open Source Alternative for UK Public Sector with Red Hat OpenStack Platform
    Red Hat, Inc. (NYSE:RHT), the world’s leading provider of open source solutions, today announced that UKCloud, the foremost public cloud provider for UK government, has standardized on Red Hat OpenStack Platform with Red Hat Ceph Storage to lead its public sector customers through their digital transformation journey. The Infrastructure-as-a-Service cloud platform is designed to enable UKCloud’s customers to deliver digital services directly to citizens by providing the required levels of scalability, performance and assurance.
  • Rackspace Enhances Private Cloud with Red Hat CloudForms
    Rackspace (NYSE: RAX) today announced support for Red Hat CloudForms, an enterprise management platform. With this new capability, enterprise customers can now use the power of Red Hat CloudForms in conjunction with Rackspace Private Cloud powered by Red Hat, which is managed and supported by two leading OpenStack vendors in the industry. This is an important milestone for Rackspace customers who want to deliver a complete private cloud solution to their users across multiple cloud platforms. For Rackspace and Red Hat, it is a continuation of the companies' commitment to empowering customers by enhancing capabilities in the core OpenStack project, while also integrating value-added software when appropriate.
  • Pay Close Attention To These Analyst Ratings: Red Hat, Inc. (NYSE:RHT), Facebook, Inc. (NASDAQ:FB)
  • The perils of long development cycles
    As for today, latest version of systemd is v231, released in July 2016. This is the version that will be in Fedora 25 (to be GA in three weeks). That's quite a long time between releases for systemd – we used to have a new version every two weeks. During the hackfest at systemd.conf 2016, I've tried to tackle three issues biting me with Fedora 24 (v229, released in February this year) and F25. The outcome was… unexpected.
  • Switchable / Hybrid Graphics support in Fedora 25
    Recently I've been working on improving hybrid graphics support for the upcoming Fedora 25 release. Although Fedora 25 Workstation will use Wayland by default for its GNOME 3 desktop, my work has been on hybrid gfx support under X11 (Xorg) as GNOME 3 on Wayland does not yet support hybrid gfx,