Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

NVIDIA Linux Driver Performance

Filed under
Software

Unlike the NVIDIA Windows Forceware drivers, Linux NVIDIA display drivers don't stick to as stringent release deadlines. Since January of 2004 there have been over ten releases for Windows users while Linux fans have only experienced six release candidates. However, do these Linux drivers manage to pack a larger punch? We have re-investigated the latest of these Linux releases to see the performance benefits of these upgrades. The Linux releases we'll be testing today include the 1.0-7174, 1.0-7167, and 1.0-6629. Originally, we had also planned on also showing results for the 1.0-6111 drivers; however we were unable to build a NVIDIA kernel module for the display drivers using the 2.6 kernel. As GeForce 6600GT support was only granted to these Linux drivers in November of 2004, we were only able to compare the two latest NVIDIA releases. To get a better understanding for the level of performance, we tested these drivers on two independent testbeds. One testbed contained a Gigabyte 6600GT PCI Express while the other used a Prolink FX5900XT AGP. For the benchmarks, we used Unreal Tournament 2003 Demo (2206), Unreal Tournament 2004 Demo (3334), Doom 3 (1.1.1286), and SPECViewPerf (8.0). Below are both testbeds that were used in the testing process.

Full Article.

More in Tux Machines

The Licensing and Compliance Lab interviews François Marier, creator of Libravatar

In this edition, we conducted an email-based interview with François Marier, a free software developer from New Zealand. He is the creator and lead developer of Libravatar. In addition to his passion for decentralization, he contributes to the Debian project and volunteers on the FSF licensing team. Libravatar is a free network service providing profile photos for a number of Web sites, including bugs.debian.org and git.kernel.org. Its flexible architecture allows end users to host their own images and allows Web sites to use Gravatar as a fallback when necessary. It is licensed under the GNU Affero General Public License version 3, or end user can opt for any later version (GNU AGPLv3+). Read more

Traditional Management Structure Is Obsolete, Red Hat CEO Says

An outspoken champion of that message is Jim Whitehurst, president and CEO of Raleigh-based Red Hat Software, the high-profile, $10 billion provider of open source software to the enterprise community. In his new book, “The Open Organization: Igniting Passion and Performance,” Whitehurst argues that “Red Hat is the only company that can say that it emerged out of a pure bottom-up culture—namely, the open source ethos—and learned how to execute it at scale.” Read more

Conservancy Seeks Your Questions on GPL Enforcement

Historically, Conservancy has published extensive materials about enforcement of the GPL, including blog posts, announcements regarding compliance actions, many sections appearing in the definitive Copyleft Guide (a joint initiative with the Free Software Foundation). After Conservancy's recent announcement of its funding of Christoph Hellwig's lawsuit against VMware, Conservancy has sought to answer as many questions as possible about GPL enforcement. Read more

SourceForge locked in projects of fleeing users, cashed in on malvertising [Updated]

The takeover of the SourceForge account for the Windows version of the open-source GIMP image editing tool reported by Ars last week is hardly the first case of the once-pioneering software repository attempting to cash in on open-source projects that have gone inactive or have actually attempted to shut down their SourceForge accounts. Over the past few years, SourceForge (launched by VA Linux Systems in 1999 and now owned by the tech job site company previously known as Dice) has made it a business practice to turn abandoned or inactive projects into platforms for distribution of "bundle-ware" installers. Despite promises to avoid deceptive advertisements that trick site visitors into downloading unwanted software and malware onto their computers, these malicious ads are legion on projects that have been taken over by SourceForge's anonymous editorial staff. SourceForge's search engine ranking for these projects often makes the site the first link provided to people seeking downloads for code on Google and Bing search results. And because of SourceForge's policies, it's nearly impossible for open-source projects to get their code removed from the site. SourceForge is, in essence, the Hotel California of code repositories: you can check your project out any time you want, but you can never leave. Read more [Ed: Why am I not surprised?]