Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

OpenSuSE 10.2 Review

Filed under
Reviews
SUSE

My previous experience with SuSE was with the 10.1 version of the product, which while worked for what I wanted, tended to be a bit sluggish on my AMD Athlon XP 2600 and I changed to KUbuntu in the meanwhile.

I have always liked SuSE as it seemed to be the most efficient at getting hardware to work out of the box with a minimum of fuss; that came at a performance hit. I have liked Debian based distros as well, for their speed I feel and still do that Debian based distros leave the RedHat and SuSE's of the world in their wake for sheer optimisation of speed.

Installation:
Nothing new here except the background and the splash screen. Seems that the developers at OpenSuSE have taken great interest in the Microsoft / Novell deals of late and seen to distance themselves from it by re-branding SuSE to OpenSuSE in the distro. Personally I think that it is much too early to judge Novell on their decision to "jump into bed with the beast" in regards to this.

Full Story.

More in Tux Machines

Today in Techrights

Uselessd: A Stripped Down Version Of Systemd

The boycotting of systemd has led to the creation of uselessd, a new init daemon based off systemd that tries to strip out the "unnecessary" features. Uselessd in its early stages of development is systemd reduced to being a basic init daemon process with "the superfluous stuff cut out". Among the items removed are removing of journald, libudev, udevd, and superfluous unit types. Read more

Open source is not dead

I don’t think you can compare Red Hat to other Linux distributions because we are not a distribution company. We have a business model on Enterprise Linux. But I would compare the other distributions to Fedora because it’s a community-driven distribution. The commercially-driven distribution for Red Hat which is Enterprise Linux has paid staff behind it and unlike Microsoft we have a Security Response Team. So for example, even if we have the smallest security issue, we have a guaranteed resolution pattern which nobody else can give because everybody has volunteers, which is fine. I am not saying that the volunteers are not good people, they are often the best people in the industry but they have no hard commitments to fixing certain things within certain timeframes. They will fix it when they can. Most of those people are committed and will immediately get onto it. But as a company that uses open source you have no guarantee about the resolution time. So in terms of this, it is much better using Red Hat in that sense. It’s really what our business model is designed around; to give securities and certainties to the customers who want to use open source. Read more

10 Reasons to use open source software defined networking

Software-defined networking (SDN) is emerging as one of the fastest growing segments of open source software (OSS), which in itself is now firmly entrenched in the enterprise IT world. SDN simplifies IT network configuration and management by decoupling control from the physical network infrastructure. Read more