Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

TestDriving SimplyMepis 6.0-4 Beta 2

Filed under
Linux
Reviews
-s

SimplyMepis is in another development cycle and version 6.0-4 beta 2 was recently released. I wasn't overly impressed with the original 6.0 release and was a bit curious as to how things were progressing. So, I downloaded the 32bit beta 2 to give it a test run. This is what I saw.

The initial boot screen remains mostly unchanged. Your choices still encompass options for graphical compatibility and I booted using the default "Boot Normal." I was testing this release on my newly acquired HP laptop as my desktop was busy with a long compile. Mepis detected the graphics and display correctly and booted in a well proportioned resolution. The new silent boot splash is quite attractive and definitely much improved. It is still Mepis blue and has a discreet logo at the bottom center featuring the Mepis pyramids under the sun. The matching login screen is updated and looking very pretty as well. So is the KDE start splash. Things were looking good for Mepis so far.

        

At the desktop I found the correct resolution of 1200x800 used and the touchpad working properly. Sound was detected, configured, and working although the volume buttons on the laptop didn't. However, sound could be adjusted using kmix. I wasn't surprised that the wireless wasn't detected and I didn't have much luck with ndiswrapper and the windows drivers. However the wired ethernet was detected and with a cable plugged in, the internet connection was ready to go upon login.

The default desktop wallpaper is much more attractive than in Mepis past. The color seems more fashionable and the design much more modern. The panel stretched about 75% of the screen width in a normal mode. Obviously missing this release was the old cartoon aquarium. This was a cool little applet - six years ago. But it does seem quite antiquated now. It was a good decision to lose it. Kweather is still present as well as ksensors, which seemed to be functioning properly on my laptop. The trash can is now in the panel as well, but other icons still occupied the desktop. Those included a shortcut to Demo's documents folder, the mounted cd/dvd disk, a mepis help link, and a link to the Mepis harddrive Installer. I think if you're gonna put the trash can in the panel, you should lose the rest of the desktop icons as well. One good point is that all the commercial adverts/icons are not present. At the other end of the panel is this really nice start button icon featuring the updated Mepis logo. In fact, all the icons were updated to a much nicer theme. Taking all into consideration, the desktop of SimplyMepis is looking really nice.

The menu structure is still basically the same as found in 6.0, but it seems like the number of applications has decreased. There are still plenty available including of course all the KDE apps as well as some that don't come in the KDE releases. Firefox is the main browser and is the latest available version, 2.0.0.1. However, OpenOffice.org is still 2.0.2. They will need to update that, especially in light of the latest vulnerability reported. Gaim is still present as well as ebay bidwatcher. Kino, digicam, showfoto, and Xara Xtreme are included as well as, of course, The Gimp 2.2. Thunderbird is included if you prefer it to Kontact. Kmplayer, amarok, and RealPlayer are featured for multimedia enjoyment. There is KlamAV and Guarddog for those who are security conscious. All of these apps worked really well. I didn't test every single application in the menu, but I did try to hit all those that aren't part of the KDE packages. All I tested fired up and functioned.

        

One of the apps that worked really well was kmplayer. I was quite tickled to be able to watch some downloaded movie and sample files. Another was browser plugins. I was able to watch videos at google video as well as quick time trailers, although I had some trouble with the trailers at gamespot.com. Flash and java(script) worked wonderfully. It's nice to run into a distro that includes this kind of support.

        

And of course there are a few system tools and utilities. They are still using synaptic for package management, which did not function here on the livecd. Kcontrol has been replaced by System Settings, as we saw last release. Kcontrol is still present, even if not in the menu. System Settings calls up all the kcontrol modules, so I'm still wondering why. I couldn't seem to find anything like a system wide configuration utility for hardware management and the like, but perhaps my eyes are beginning to show their age. There is also Mepis' harddrive installer that always worked well in the past. We'll test it out again when this cycle gets closer to gold.

Under the hood we're looking at kernel-2.6.15 and gcc 4.0.3. Xorg is version 7.0 and KDE is 3.5.3. I was a bit disappointed at the older kernel and especially the older KDE. 3.5.6 is due to be tagged on January 15, perhaps they'll upgrade for the next beta. It's hard to detect Ubuntu's influence beyond some of the package names and that System Settings (as found in Kubuntu).

All in all, SimplyMepis is beginning to get back into their groove again I think. Overall, I liked what I saw in this beta. They are spending more time or thought in the appearance of their offering as well as trying to make it more utilitarian. Hardware detection and setup was very good. It was looking great and seemed to function really well at this point. I was disappointed in the age of some of the included applications and KDE, but again, despite this they functioned well. Mepis was once at the top of the game and hopefully they'll find themselves there again. The playing field is a bit more competitive these days, but SimplyMepis is still a very good choice for newcomers and experienced alike. They paved the way for many of today's distros in many areas and I'd like to see them reach a higher level of popularity again. Perhaps this release will help. Time will tell.

Quick Update.

Thanks.

I've been wondering about the status of the new Mepis release, so thanks for another good write-up.

I'll definitely check out the Mepis 6.0 release when it's out of beta and officially released.

But, of course, what I'm really anxious for is the imminent release of PCLinuxOS .94--with all the packages compiled with the updated gcc compiler and associated c/cpp libraries, they'll no longer be those few applications that I can't compile myself to run with PCLinuxOS.

I did not renew my Mandriva silver level club membership, and I'll be sending those dollars to tex, next month, to support PCLinuxOS.

re: Thanks

Thanks for saying. Yeah, I'm anxious to test pclos on that laptop as well. I got opensuse working on it real nice, but I really want to use pclos on it. I hope I can get the wireless working. A lot of distros' ndiswrapper is complaining about the windows driver being 64bit. So far none I have found on the internet will work. I could go with a 64 bit system, but I don't think Tex is gonna put out both a 32 and 64. And if I can't get pclos to work on it, I might as well stick with opensuse. I'm not gonna mess with gentoo on it. Tongue

I let my mandriva membership run out in 2004 I guess it was. I'm not overly impressed with their releases anymore. But I keep checking 'em out. They could always turn it around like it appears Mepis is doing.

----
You talk the talk, but do you waddle the waddle?

Well, I like 'em both

gfranken wrote:
I've been wondering about the status of the new Mepis release, so thanks for another good write-up.

I'll definitely check out the Mepis 6.0 release when it's out of beta and officially released.

But, of course, what I'm really anxious for is the imminent release of PCLinuxOS .94--with all the packages compiled with the updated gcc compiler and associated c/cpp libraries, they'll no longer be those few applications that I can't compile myself to run with PCLinuxOS.

I did not renew my Mandriva silver level club membership, and I'll be sending those dollars to tex, next month, to support PCLinuxOS.

I do really like PC Linux OS, and I now prefer it to a default Mandriva installation, (but I still enjoy playing with the Cooker). Nevertheless, for me, Debian distros win it for me.

Some have said that PCLOS has superior graphic art, and I cannot argue with that. I also like the way Texstar has taken a base Mandriva system, done a vastly superior job to Mandriva One, then add integration features. I do want it on my keeper's list.

But I've been a Warren Woodford fan, too. His distro, in my mind, opened previously unopened doors in the Debian desktop space. He took a blend of Knoppix and/or Morphix, put a really nice set of working packages in it, then worked tirelessly with the community to improve on it.

The only thing that held it back was a time period in which Warren was seriously ill. But that led to the opportunity to leverage another good base system's work, and that is where MEPIS now bases its efforts, on top of a solid (K)Ubuntu core.

I definitely will be testing and using both PCLOS and MEPIS. Based on today, I will, more than likely, continue to use MEPIS as my main desk, but I'd love to see if PCLOS can move up, maybe into the number two slot. I keep around ten desktop distros. My top five are EXCELLENT!

Brian Masinick
masinick .AT yahoo .DOT com

I have long been a MEPIS fan

I liked MEPIS back in 2003 when the direction for the distro was first being established. Back in those days, MEPIS ran like a rabbit around a track with a lightweight window manager guiding it, IceWM. Therefore it worked great with a Live CD. Most people do not use IceWM, even if the geeks do, so it had to do something else.

In 2004, MEPIS signed a deal with Robin Miller and Prentice Hall publishers and came out with Point N Click Linux, and SimplyMEPIS 2004 was born.

MEPIS has continued to evolve and grow since then.

It was after the DCC and the slow kernel and application maintenance that Warren Woodford set MEPIS on its current course, tracking Ubuntu releases and adding simplicity to the installation process and better handling of devices.

I see that process continuing to improve. The one area where MEPIS was weak was in the Graphic Arts department. Volunteers have greatly improved that. I have not had a chance to review this edition, but I regularly use the current release and I do run the package updates. MEPIS as it exists today is stable and maintainable. I expect this release to be an incremental improvement, with somewhat better graphics and somewhat better hardware suppport.

I anticipate installing the final version. I have tested beta releases many times in the past and I have been delighted with them. MEPIS is one of the few distros where 75-95% of things work even in an Alpha release, and all but a few things work right up until the final release. Stable and product quality are things you can expect. I expect the final version of this release will be no different. But since I am spending more time as a desktop user rather than a tester, this time I will wait for the final version before upgrading, but I expect to make the final version, once again, my default desktop partition.

Brian Masinick
masinick .AT yahoo .DOT com

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More in Tux Machines

Best Linux Distribution for Windows Users in 2019

It wasn’t too long ago that we published an article on the best Linux distros that looks like MacOS. Today, our focus is not necessarily on distributions that have a similar UI to that of Windows, but ones that are, firstly, convenient for Windows users to use due to familiarity, and secondly, without technical hurdles during installation or application set up. Read more

Top 5 reasons to switch from Windows to Linux right now

When my editor approached me to write an article on reasons to switch from Windows to Linux, I could not help but to chuckle to myself. Earlier in the week, a photographer friend of mine posted on my Facebook page thanking me for turning him on to Linux. I was hardly surprised to see his post. I always preach the “gospel of Linux” to my friends, family, acquaintances, and, well, pretty much whoever I talk to. What is surprising is I’ve not seen my friend in over five years. I barely even remember the conversation. However, I don’t doubt it happened. I’ve been trying to turn Windows users into Linux users for well over 15 years. Read more

Benchmark results on mdds multi_type_vector

One of the data structures included in mdds, called multi_type_vector, stores values of different types in a single logical vector. LibreOffice Calc is one primary user of this. Calc uses this structure as its cell value store, and each instance of this value store represents a single column instance. Internally, multi_type_vector creates multiple element blocks which are in turn stored in its parent array (primary array). This primary array maps a logical position of a value to the actual block instance that stores it. Up to version 1.5.0, this mapping process involved a linear search that always starts from the first block of the primary array. This was because each element block, though it stores the size of the block, does not store its logical position. So the only way to find the right element block that intersects the logical position of a value is to scan from the first block then keep accumulating the sizes of the encountered blocks. The reason for not storing the logical positions of the blocks was to avoid having to update them after shifting the blocks after value insertion, which is quite common when editing spreadsheet documents. Of course, sometimes one has to perform repeated searches to access a number of element values across a number of element blocks, in which case, always starting the search from the first block, or block 0, in every single search can be prohibitively expensive, especially when the vector is heavily fragmented. To alleviate this, multi_type_vector provides the concept of position hints, which allows the caller to start the search from block N where N > 0. Most of multi_type_vector’s methods return a position hint which can be used for the next search operation. This allows the caller to chain all necessary search operations in such a way to only scan the primary array once for the entire sequence of search operations. The only prerequisite is that access to the elements occur in perfect ascending order. For the most part, this approach worked quite well. Read more Also: Phoronix Test Suite 9.2.1 Released

BSD: BGP and OpenBGPD, FreeBSD and OpenBSD

  • Meet Radiant Award Recipient Claudio Jeker

    When we at ISRG think about the greatest threats to Web security today, the lack of Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) security might top our list. Claudio's passion for networking, his focus on security, and his talent as a software developer are enabling him to make great contributions to fixing this and other Web security problems. In particular, he is making great contributions to OpenBSD and OpenBGPD.

  • 2019 in Review: Advocacy

    2019 began with a big announcement regarding the FreeBSD Journal. You can now access every issue for Free! We’re very excited to be able to bring all of the informative articles to the community at no cost. If you haven’t read it yet, please take a look and share with your friends and colleagues.

  • Why computers suck and how learning from OpenBSD can make them marginally less horrible

    Next I will compare this enterprise development model approach with non-enterprise development - projects such as OpenBSD, which do not hesitate to introduce binary interface and API breaking changes to improve the code.

    One of the most commonly referred to pillars of the project's philosophy has long been it's emphasis on clean functional code. Any code which makes it into OpenBSD is subject to ongoing aggressive audits for deprecated, or otherwise unmaintained code in order to reduce cruft and attack surface. Additionally the project creator, Theo de Raadt, and his team of core developers engage in ongoing development for proactive mitigations for various attack classes many of which are directly adopted by various multi-platform userland applications as well as the operating systems themselves (Windows, Linux, and the other BSDs). Frequently it is the case that introducing new features (not just deprecating old ones) introduces new incompatibilities against previously functional binaries compiled for OpenBSD.