Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Aaron J. Seigo: backward compat is good, bad

Filed under
OSS

i read ian murdock's blog entry on the importance of backwards compatibility i found myself at once agreeing and wincing.

i agree that backwards compatibility is down right important, particularly for our users not to mention third party developers. the example ian used from joel's blog about sim city causing microsoft to patch their allocator so it behaved differently just for that one app (!!!) is so amazingly bad, though, that it's a bit unfortunate. a number of the comments on his blog got sidetracked by this poor choice of an example.

however, backwards compatibility, like most things in life, is neither all good or all bad. (dualism: blech!) with all the upside of it, there's also the drawbacks that come with it. namely increased engineering costs due to increased complexity of both development and testing, greater exposure to security risks and a real stunting of innovation since you can't just change things willy nilly.

we all want quickly developing, solid and innovative software ... but we also want backwards compatibility. how do we get both?

Full Story.

Another Opinion.

More in Tux Machines

Tunir 0.13 is released and one year of development

I have started Tunir on Jan 12 2015, means it got more than one year of development history. At the beginning it was just a project to help me out with Fedora Cloud image testing. But it grew to a point where it is being used as the Autocloud backend to test Fedora Cloud, and Vagrant images. We will soon start testing the Fedora AMI(s) too using the same. Within this one year, there were total 7 contributors to the project. In total we are around 1k lines of Python code. I am personally using Tunir for various other projects too. One funny thing from the code commits timings, no commit on Sundays :) Read more

Andy Rubin Unleashed Android on the World. Now Watch Him Do the Same With AI

Now that Rubin had shepherded smartphones from concept to phenomenon, they no longer held much interest. As an engineering problem, they had been solved. Sure, entrepreneurs kept launching new apps, but for someone who considered engineering an art, that was like adding a few brushstrokes atop layers of dried paint. Rubin wanted to touch canvas again—and he could see a fresh one unfurling in front of him. Read more

Building a culture of more pluggable open source

If there is one word that often percolates conversations hailing the benefits of open source, it is choice. We often celebrate many of the 800+ Linux distributions, the countless desktops, applications, frameworks, and more. Choice, it would seem, is a good thing. Interestingly, choice is also an emotive thing. Read more

A new frontier for open source: Linux will power our robotic future

"You know, with windows versus Linux, Windows got there first by a long shot. It was the entrenched party. So Linux is the scrappy upstart. In the case of robotics, open source got there first. The community grew up doing things the open source way. There was actually a period in the mid-2000s where Microsoft put a lot of effort into its Windows-based Robotics Developer Studio. It had really good features, but it's never taken off. So yeah, I think robotics are proving to be a different situation than what happened with personal computing." Long live Linux. Long live ROS. Long live open source. Read more