Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Why Having 500+ Distros is a Good Thing

Filed under
Linux

I happened upon a blog entry titled "So Many Distros, So Little Time" which originally jumped across the RSS reader during January of this year. I gave it an honest read and was disgusted with the article quite a bit. Let me go point for point on this:

1. "We don’t need to keep reinventing Linux, creating distributions that
put critical bits in interesting and inventive if unusual places."

This couldn't be more wrong. We DO need to keep reinventing Linux and creating distributions that put critical bits in interesting and inventive if unusual places. Without these multiple distributions and their drive to do what isn't "normal" or "business as usual" innovation would be left up to a small number of distros and developers. Innovation thrives in the current environment...we have seen how desktop Linux has lept & bounded during the past 3-4 years. This statement is not only false, but it shows how much people (even industry consultants/analysts/journalists with over 25 years in the business) totally miss the mark when it comes to Linux and Open Source Software.

I assume you'd prefer a 'unified distro' or at least fewer to choose from...one where everyone can stop spinning their wheels developing for that small time distro and all join hands and work on that larger distro and make it 1000% better right? That's something that won't happen and shouldn't happen.

Perhaps you think new users will be scared of all of these choices?

Full Story.

re: 500+ Distros

Well, that's one opinion, a WRONG opinion.

With this guys logic, if you have 100 monkeys pounding on typewriters and they don't produce a Shakespearean play, you just need to add more monkeys.

Innovation has NOTHING to do with quantity, and everything to do with quality. Coding is NOT a serendipitous event.

The clothes/car analogy is so very flawed. With all the choices of cars or trucks, how many of those choices don't have a steering wheel? Or a gas pedal? With all the clothes, how many pants have something besides a zipper or buttons or snaps? Those options aren't innovated, they're fashion choices driven by market economies.

Currently, with 500+ distros, all you have is alot of people, reinventing the wheel, and a handful of people, actually creating anything new or useful.

If innovation was the result of quantity, why are there only 3 commercial linux server distros (redhat, suse, and yes, I'll be kind and include mandriva enterprise).

In order to become anything close to mainstream, Linux needs to FOCUS, and that ain't gonna happen with every developer wannabe doing their own thing (hence the 9 zillion projects at the v0.9 and under stage that NEVER make it).

If they truly have something to contribute, join a viable project and ADD to the collective work instead of just increasing the noise.

re: re: 500+ distros

I'd say yours is the wrong opinion. The people behind the multiple linux distros are not "monkeys pounding on typewriters". They are - to stay in your analogy - people making an effort at being poets. Some of them good, some of them not. Applying your logic, Shakespeare would probably never have been published. The reason why the free market is superior to communism is it's evolutionary principle - the same reason why linux will prove superior to windows in the years to come.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More in Tux Machines

Kubuntu 14.10 review

KDE has improved in may respects since my last review of Kubuntu, so it’s fair to say that Kubuntu itself has improved. Muon Discover has improved too, so kudos to the developer. However, Kubuntu is not the best KDE-using distribution around. ROSA Desktop, for example, offers many more features than most KDE-using desktops. That said, Kubuntu 14.10 should be good enough for most users. If you would like to take it for a spin on your computer, installation images are available for download from here. Read more

Dispelling the myths of open source licences

Misconceptions surrounding the rights and obligations provided by open source software in the enterprise have fueled the spread of fear, uncertainty and doubt. A better understanding of the role open source licensing will help organizations realist the full potential of open source investments. Read more

Cinnamon Desktop Spices Up Makulu Linux

The Makulu Cinnamon Debian Edition 1.1 marks a new path for Makulu. This latest release has numerous new features that could make it a top competitor against the Linux Mint Cinnamon edition. Read more

Ubuntu 14.10 vs Kubuntu 14.10 vs Xubuntu 14.10 vs Lubuntu 14.10 vs Ubuntu GNOME 14.10: A Comparison

So, in nutshell, I found Lubuntu 14.10 to be the best in performance among the Ubuntu distros. It offered me trouble free experience throughout my usage and I found it to be really stable. Anyone looking for a really really efficient distro and those with low powered machines can safely bet on Lubuntu 14.10 Based on my experience, I found Ubuntu GNOME to be the second best offering very decent performance with a very refined desktop environment. I thought Xubuntu would occupy this position but unfortunately, a bit of instability in the distro marred my experience. I would safely recommend Ubuntu GNOME 14.10 to users with modern laptop with or without touchscreen over the rest of the four distros. As usual Kubuntu is the slowest of the lot and consumes the most power. You can expect the least battery life from Kubuntu. However, the desktop environment (specially the Plasma 5 upgrade) is mind blowing! Those with powerful modern machines and less usage of battery power can safely choose Kubuntu as it seemed to be the most exciting of the lot. Read more