Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Quick Cruise Around Fedora 7 Test 2

Filed under

Fedora 7 test 2 was announced yesterday and since they now put out livecds as well as their install images, I thought I'd take it for a little test drive. Fedora's always been a bit neglected around here, but there are good reasons for that. Honestly, I've never been a big Red Hat fan and Anaconda discriminating against my hard drives didn't help. So, Fedora being delivered in a livecd format gives Tuxmachines a welcomed opportunity to test it.

The Livecd

The livecd boots up to a nice looking customized grub screen with only two choices consisting of booting Fedora or loading it into ram first. One can press <Tab> to edit the boot parameters if needed. Fedora's livecd takes quite a while to boot here and one can see SELinux being implemented and lots of services. The graphics were detected really well on my HP laptop, but on my desktop I had to do a bit of coaxing, as my dual monitor setup confused it (as commonly happens with livecds). I had to edit the sparse /etc/X11/xorg.conf file in order to talk X into working. Once booted into the gnome 2.18 (2.17.91), one first notices this lovely wallpaper primarily in darker blue hues featuring several hot-air balloons flying above some clouds in a skyscape and the fedora logo. This is one of the better looking default gnome setups I've seen and the fonts look really great on both my desktop and notebook.

The System

The menu is a bit sparse. There weren't many application choices and some of those were inoperative. Fedora 7 livecd features Abiword for word processing, but it failed to open here. Instead a ghost window opens and a bug report popup soon follows. Other office applications include elements of evolution for Tasks and Calendar and gnumeric for spreadsheet work. Graphics includes The Gimp, gThumb, Inkscape and F-Spot photo manager. F-Spot crashes too. For internet tasks one has Firefox, Evolution, Gaim, and a blogger client. The vpn app wouldn't open. There were quite a few smaller 2d games included like Blackjack, Klondike, Mahjongg, Nibbles and Sudoku. 3D PPRacer is also included. Multimedia consists of Rhythmbox music player, a cd player and Totem movie player. The cd player opened one of those ghost windows and since Fedora couldn't see any of my higher partition numbers, I didn't get to test the movie player. Some accessories include an archive manager, gedit, a calculator, character map and an online dictionary.

All your basic gnome personal configuration modules are present in the menu and in the gnome-control-center. There are a few system configuration tools as well, including a SELinux Troubleshooter. My internet connection on the desktop was up at boot. The printer configuration started well displaying success in detection, couldn't finish here due to missing drivers. There were no scanner backends or applications included. Removeable media can't be mounted or umounted by the user as offered in the right-click menu of their "Computer" window because it requires root permissions to do so. There is a software updater present and it did download update availability information. I didn't test any actual updates.

This release features a 2.6.20 kernel, Xorg 7.2, and gnome 2.18.



The Installer

Like the printer configuration, the hard drive installer starts off looking good. I go through the language, keymap, timezone, etc. steps and even designated a partition I knew fedora could see as /. Right before the install was to begin, I got error pop-ups about 'fedora not being able to read /dev/sda16' and on, but I could safely ignore those. However, as with all Red Hats and Fedoras since about 4.0, it couldn't finish the install and only gave a cryptic error message.

I looked into this error (assuming it was the same this time) once upon a time, and found a few questions and little answers. I recall one post stated that Red Hat/Fedora developers knew of this bug and didn't care. All I was able to ascertain at the time was that it had to do with partitioning my drive with fdisk as opposed to Red Hat's partitioning tool. I've had this happen on about 6 different harddrives of varying speeds and sizes from 4 different manufacturers. This has happened across about 3 or 4 different motherboards as well. The only successful install using Anaconda I've had in the last 5 years or so was when I had an extra small harddrive on which I deleted all partitions and let Anaconda set up new ones.



As stated above, the graphics on the laptop were no problem. Fedora correctly detected my display and chip to give the desired resolution of 1200x800. There is a battery monitor and ac/battery profile configuration that seems to work. There also seemed to be cpufreq present and working. However, suspend and hibernate didn't work, but perhaps that was due to being run off livecd. The biggest issue for me was not being able to get my wireless connection working. The linux drivers for chipsets similar to mine don't work for me. I try them each distro to be sure, and indeed they didn't work with Fedora. That's not usually a problem, but what was a problem is the missing ndiswrapper tools. I couldn't seem to find hide nor hair of it, of course I could have missed it as there didn't seem to be a (s)locate present either.


Perhaps my disappointment in Fedora came through in the above information. I try to be objective, but sometimes distros don't just live up to their reputations or the perceived expectations. This was one of those times. Fedora 7 livecd looks good with it's nice wallpaper, customized gnome theme, and pretty fonts, but it just didn't seem to offer a whole lot besides. Apps were quite sparse even for a livecd. I can overlook the app crashes as this is still a test version, but the continuing installer situation is frustrating. I suppose if you are a Fedora fan or if I could actually test the real distribution it might be different. As it is, I'm just not impressed with Fedora 7 beyond its appearance.

re: Fedora 7

Ouch. Fair review (sometimes the truth hurts).

Of course being a longtime Fedora user, I'm hoping the kinks will get worked out by release (which has already been announced as being pushed back at least a few weeks).

They're trying to cram alot of big changes into F7, so it could be a rocky release. I'm looking forward to KVM support and a better YUM, so I have my fingers crossed for the developers.

What about browser plugins & codecs

I've always liked the look feel of fedora but, what has always put me off is its total lack of any browser plugins, media players, required codecs and other things like the Java runtime environment. Ok, I wouldn't mind if it didn't install these things when installing but It should be an easy task to accomplish to install these from one of the install CD's after the install. There are none of these required components on any of the install Cd's. The reviewer complained the the Sidux distro didn't have these but made no mention of it in this review. Maybe it's because its a test version. I hope all is OK on the final version cos I would love to be able to use fedora. In these times its almost prehistoric not to have a user friendly distro thats easy to install, set up, install other software into & all the requirements for a full web capability/experience.

re: browser plugins & codecs

Oh, sorry. Nope, no java, flash, or movie plugins and no codecs. Can't even watch a mpg.

Susan, maybe it's not about

Susan, maybe it's not about any of the 4-5 motherboards, nor about the HDDs. Maybe it's about your 42 partitions, eh?

re: maybe it's not about

Well, I might wonder about that except I did find those posts from others with same problem and I got that error with that one smaller drive too at first until I deleted the partitions and let anaconda do its thing. it only had 4 partitions on it.

And still even if it was due to slicing my drive up into so many smaller partitions, only distros using anaconda shoot that error.

So, I don't know.

A curious live CD

There were no "hdxy" entries in /dev. So that's the first time I've ever had to mount partitions using "/dev/disk/by-label/label" rather than "/dev/hdxy". Is this the same when it's installed?

And, after installing the kernel-devel, binutils, gcc, and make packages, and specifying the path to the kernel sources, the nvidia installer didn't work. It built the module, but errored out insmod'ing it. IIRC, it complained that the kernel (2.6.20-1.2960.fc7-i686) wasn't built using the same version of the tools used to compile the module. Then it crashed to hard reset shortly after switching back to runlevel 5. Oh, well.

The new icon set and default background do look very nice.

Maybe we should have a competition with prizes for whomever guesses how many partitions s actually has on her hard drives. Smile

re: A curious live CD

I noticed it was using /dev/sdaX on mine, which was a first. I have a sata drive in the laptop and all distros use sdaX on it, but that was the first time I got that on the desktop.

Review: Fedora 7 Test 2

On March 1, Red Hat released Fedora 7 Test 2. Here’s my quick look at the live CD version of this distro. I’ll wait until the final release to do a full install.
The live CD, downloaded here, is a nice way to test new releases of distributions without having to install the entire distribution.

First Boot

I burned the CD and put it in my desktop (no VM, as apparently the fact I test things on both my desktop natively, and on my MacBook Pro in a VM confused people on previous reviews). The boot loader came up and I picked the option to boot the Live CD to RAM. I figured with 2GB of RAM this would make things a lot faster for me.

The boot messages started scrolling and eventually X started up.

And that’s as far as it got.

Second Try

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More in Tux Machines

Security: Google and Morgan Marquis-Boire

  • Google: 25 per cent of black market passwords can access accounts

    The researchers used Google's proprietary data to see whether or not stolen passwords could be used to gain access to user accounts, and found that an estimated 25 per cent of the stolen credentials can successfully be used by cyber crooks to gain access to functioning Google accounts.

  • Data breaches, phishing, or malware? Understanding the risks of stolen credentials

    Drawing upon Google as a case study, we find 7--25\% of exposed passwords match a victim's Google account.

  • Infosec star accused of sexual assault booted from professional affiliations
    A well-known computer security researcher, Morgan Marquis-Boire, has been publicly accused of sexual assault. On Sunday, The Verge published a report saying that it had spoken with 10 women across North America and Marquis-Boire's home country of New Zealand who say that they were assaulted by him in episodes going back years. A woman that The Verge gave the pseudonym "Lila," provided The Verge with "both a chat log and a PGP signed and encrypted e-mail from Morgan Marquis-Boire. In the e-mail, he apologizes at great length for a terrible but unspecified wrong. And in the chat log, he explicitly confesses to raping and beating her in the hotel room in Toronto, and also confesses to raping multiple women in New Zealand and Australia."

Review: Fedora 27 Workstation

On the whole there are several things to like about Fedora 27. The operating system was stable during my trial and I like that there are several session options, depending on whether we want to use Wayland or the X display server or even a more traditional-looking version of GNOME. I am happy to see Wayland is coming along to the point where it is close to on par with the X session. There are some corner cases to address, but GNOME on Wayland has improved a lot in the past year. I like the new LibreOffice feature which lets us sign and verify documents and I like GNOME's new settings panel. These are all small, but notable steps forward for GNOME, LibreOffice and Fedora. Most of the complaints I had this week had more to do with GNOME specifically than Fedora as an operating system. GNOME on Fedora is sluggish on my systems, both on the desktop computer and in VirtualBox, especially the Wayland session. This surprised me as when I ran GNOME's Wayland session on Ubuntu last month, the desktop performed quite a bit better. Ubuntu's GNOME on Wayland session was smooth and responsive, but Fedora's was too slow for me to use comfortably and I switched over to using the X session for most of my trial. Two other big differences I felt keenly between Ubuntu and Fedora were with regards to how these two leading projects set up GNOME. On Ubuntu we have a dock that acts as a task switcher, making it a suitable environment for multitasking. Fedora's GNOME has no equivalent. This means Fedora's GNOME is okay for running one or two programs at a time, but I tend to run eight or nine applications at any given moment. This becomes very awkward when using Fedora's default GNOME configuration as it is hard to switch between open windows quickly, at least without installing an extension. In a similar vein, Ubuntu's GNOME has window control buttons and Fedora's version does not, which again adds a few steps to what are usually very simple, quick actions. What it comes down to is I feel like Ubuntu takes GNOME and turns it into a full featured desktop environment, while Fedora provides us with just plain GNOME which feels more like a framework for a desktop we can then shape with extensions rather than a complete desktop environment. In fact, I think that describes Fedora's approach in general - the distribution feels more like a collection of open source utilities rather than an integrated whole. Earlier I mentioned LibreOffice can work with signed documents, but Fedora has no key manager, meaning we need to find and download one. Fedora ships with Totem, which is a fine video player, but it doesn't work with Wayland, making it an odd default choice. These little gaps or missed connections show up occasionally and it sets the distribution apart from other projects like openSUSE or Linux Mint where there is a stronger sense the pieces of the operating system working together with a unified vision. The big puzzle for me this week was with software updates. Linux effectively solved updating software and being able to keep running without a pause, reboot or lock-up decades ago. Other mainstream distributions have fast updates - some even have atomic, on-line updates. openSUSE has software snapshots through the file system, Ubuntu has live kernel updates that do away with rebooting entirely and NixOS has atomic, versioned updates via the package manager, to name just three examples. But Fedora has taken a big step backward in making updates require an immediate reboot, and taking an unusually long time to complete the update process, neither of which benefits the user. Fedora has some interesting features and I like that it showcases new technologies. It's a good place to see what new items are going to be landing in other projects next year. However, Fedora feels more and more like a testing ground for developers and less like a polished experience for people to use as their day-to-day operating system. Read more

6 Reasons Why Linux is Better than Windows For Servers

A server is a computer software or a machine that offers services to other programs or devices, referred to as “clients“. There are different types of servers: web servers, database servers, application servers, cloud computing servers, file servers, mail servers, DNS servers and much more. The usage share for Unix-like operating systems has over the years greatly improved, predominantly on servers, with Linux distributions at the forefront. Today a bigger percentage of servers on the Internet and data centers around the world are running a Linux-based operating system. Read more Also: All the supercomputers in the world moved to Linux operating systems

Android Leftovers