Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Apache Software Foundation: 2007 Open Source Outlook

Filed under
Interviews

Open Source is enjoying a fabulous ride, with F1000 adoption growing, developers and architects seeking training and new projects incubating and maturing all the time.

Recently, Apache Software Foundation Director Jim Jagielski spoke with Open Enterprise Trends about the warming climate for Open Source in 2007. Jagielski, who himself has actively contributed to many Open Source projects, talks with us about many topics of interest, including top opportunities for Open Source; the impact of new licensing (ASF 2.0 versus GPLv3.0), the newest maturing ASF projects, and the agenda for the upcoming ApacheCon (In May).

TOPIC: Top Enterprise Open Source Sectors

OET: In 2007, Open Source seems poised to really make aggressive
inroads in some very ambitious areas (ESBs, RIA, ERP, SaaS, Voice and even enterprise Java and .NET) Which sectors should excite devs and architects keep an eye on?

Jagielski: I think that 2007 will be the year of the Architecture. Most of this, of course, is predicated by the interest in SOA, and all the technologies that fall out of that. But a re-appreciation of ‘RESTful’ architectures will really come into their own. Scalability mashed with Simplicity with become exciting areas. People will rediscover that many of the "new" ideas discussed today are actually refinements (if even that) of old techniques.

TOPIC: What’s Coming at ApacheCon 2007

OET: ApacheCon 2007 is coming in May. What can you share about the treats for the upcoming keynoters and session agenda?

Jagielski: One thing which is somewhat new this year is dedicated
training sessions.

Full Story.

More in Tux Machines

Android Leftovers

The Licensing and Compliance Lab interviews AJ Jordon of gplenforced.org

So basically Bradley Kuhn gave a talk at FOSDEM '17 about GPL enforcement and I was like, wow, it sucks how many companies and people think that enforcing the GPL is a bad idea. I mean, if you disagree with copyleft that's fine (though I personally would argue with that position), but then you should use a suitable license. Like MIT. The very idea that we shouldn't enforce the GPL just doesn't make sense to me because it suggests that the text of the license is watery and unimportant. I don't know about you, but when I say I want my programs to respect users' freedom, I mean it. So GPL enforcement is important. It seemed to me that there are probably a lot of developers out there who want to support GPL enforcement but don't have a good way to voice that support. gplenforced.org is essentially a quick and dirty hack I wrote to make that dead-simple. Read more

Red Hat General and Financial News

today's howtos