Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Tension between OpenSolaris derivatives

Filed under
OS

There are currently two OpenSolaris distributions: Sun Microsystem's Solaris Express Community Release, and German developer Joerg Schilling's SchilliX. While Sun's version combines the OpenSolaris core with extra proprietary code to build a complete operating system, SchilliX is completely based on open source software.

Schilling made it clear on an OpenSolaris mailing list last week how he felt about differences between the two.

The developer said he had complained to Sun about the fact the OpenSolaris code could not be compiled without first pre-installing Sun proprietary software.

Schilling said technically there was only one OpenSolaris distribution -- his own -- and so it could even be called the reference distribution.
"If you are talking about properties of OpenSolaris," he said, "I encourage you to talk about SchilliX."

The developer further said he thought discussion on the list should not focus on features found only in Sun's version but not in the OpenSolaris code itself.

"Do not confuse OpenSolaris with the Sun Solaris distribution," he wrote. "This is an OpenSolaris mailing list."

"Making conclusions about OpenSolaris from observations done on Sun Solaris is not OK, because Sun Solaris currently differs more from OpenSolaris than SchilliX does."

However Schilling's comments drew immediate fire from Sun developers.

"While I appreciate the work that has gone into SchilliX (and it is quite a feat)," wrote Solaris kernel developer Eric Schrock, "I don't think we should be starting a distribution war on day 11 of OpenSolaris."

Schrock said developers should not equate either of the existing OpenSolaris derivatives with the OpenSolaris code, and that conversation between all versions and about any aspect of OpenSolaris should be encouraged.

"Just because it is not directly applicable to the OpenSolaris code or the advancement of SchilliX does not make it an unproductive conversation for the OpenSolaris community," he said.

A Sun developer, Eric Boutilier, said he strongly felt most people interested in OpenSolaris should be directed to Sun's Solaris Express distribution, as they would want a free and full-featured system with desktop environments like GNOME and KDE. SchilliX is currently unable to provide such functionality.

Source.

More in Tux Machines

Linux Mint 18.1 Is The Best Mint Yet

The hardcore Linux geeks won’t read this article. They’ll skip right past it… They don’t like Linux Mint much. There’s a good reason for them not to; it’s not designed for them. Linux Mint is for folks who want a stable, elegant desktop operating system that they don’t want to have to constantly tinker with. Anyone who is into Linux will find Mint rather boring because it can get as close to the bleeding edge of computer technology. That said, most of those same hardcore geeks will privately tell you that they’ve put Linux Mint on their Mom’s computer and she just loves it. Linux Mint is great for Mom. It’s stable, offers everything she needs and its familiar UI is easy for Windows refugees to figure out. If you think of Arch Linux as a finicky, high-performance sports car then Linux Mint is a reliable station wagon. The kind of car your Mom would drive. Well, I have always liked station wagons myself and if you’ve read this far then I guess you do, too. A ride in a nice station wagon, loaded with creature comforts, cold blowing AC, and a good sound system can be very relaxing, indeed. Read more

Make Gnome 3 more accessible for everyday use

Gnome 3 is a desktop environment that was created to fix a problem that did not exist. Much like PulseAudio, Wayland and Systemd, it's there to give developers a job, while offering no clear benefit over the original problem. The Gnome 2 desktop was fast, lithe, simple, and elegant, and its replacement is none of that. Maybe the presentation layer is a little less busy and you can search a bit more quickly, but that's about as far as the list of advantages goes, which is a pretty grim result for five years of coding. Despite my reservation toward Gnome 3, I still find it to be a little bit more suitable for general consumption than in the past. Some of the silly early decisions have been largely reverted, and a wee bit more sane functionality added. Not enough. Which is why I'd like to take a moment or three to discuss some extra tweaks and changes you should add to this desktop environment to make it palatable. Read more

When to Use Which Debian Linux Repository

Nothing distinguishes the Debian Linux distribution so much as its system of package repositories. Originally organized into Stable, Testing, and Unstable, additional repositories have been added over the years, until today it takes more than a knowledge of a repository's name to understand how to use it efficiently and safely. Debian repositories are installed with a section called main that consists only of free software. However, by editing the file /etc/apt/sources.list, you can add contrib, which contains software that depends on proprietary software, and non-free, which contains proprietary software. Unless you choose to use only free software, contrib and non-free are especially useful for video and wireless drivers. You should also know that the three main repositories are named for characters from the Toy Story movies. Unstable is always called Sid, while the names of Testing and Stable change. When a new version of Debian is released, Testing becomes Stable, and the new version of Testing receives a name. These names are sometimes necessary for enabling a mirror site, but otherwise, ignoring these names gives you one less thing to remember. Read more

Today in Techrights