Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Tension between OpenSolaris derivatives

Filed under
OS

There are currently two OpenSolaris distributions: Sun Microsystem's Solaris Express Community Release, and German developer Joerg Schilling's SchilliX. While Sun's version combines the OpenSolaris core with extra proprietary code to build a complete operating system, SchilliX is completely based on open source software.

Schilling made it clear on an OpenSolaris mailing list last week how he felt about differences between the two.

The developer said he had complained to Sun about the fact the OpenSolaris code could not be compiled without first pre-installing Sun proprietary software.

Schilling said technically there was only one OpenSolaris distribution -- his own -- and so it could even be called the reference distribution.
"If you are talking about properties of OpenSolaris," he said, "I encourage you to talk about SchilliX."

The developer further said he thought discussion on the list should not focus on features found only in Sun's version but not in the OpenSolaris code itself.

"Do not confuse OpenSolaris with the Sun Solaris distribution," he wrote. "This is an OpenSolaris mailing list."

"Making conclusions about OpenSolaris from observations done on Sun Solaris is not OK, because Sun Solaris currently differs more from OpenSolaris than SchilliX does."

However Schilling's comments drew immediate fire from Sun developers.

"While I appreciate the work that has gone into SchilliX (and it is quite a feat)," wrote Solaris kernel developer Eric Schrock, "I don't think we should be starting a distribution war on day 11 of OpenSolaris."

Schrock said developers should not equate either of the existing OpenSolaris derivatives with the OpenSolaris code, and that conversation between all versions and about any aspect of OpenSolaris should be encouraged.

"Just because it is not directly applicable to the OpenSolaris code or the advancement of SchilliX does not make it an unproductive conversation for the OpenSolaris community," he said.

A Sun developer, Eric Boutilier, said he strongly felt most people interested in OpenSolaris should be directed to Sun's Solaris Express distribution, as they would want a free and full-featured system with desktop environments like GNOME and KDE. SchilliX is currently unable to provide such functionality.

Source.

More in Tux Machines

KDE Ships Beta for Plasma 5's Second Release

September 30, 2014. Today KDE releases the beta for the second release of Plasma 5. Plasma 5 was released three months ago with many feature refinements and streamlining the existing codebase of KDE's popular desktop for developers to work on for the years to come. This release is for testers to find bugs before our second release of Plasma 5. Read more

Calibre for Linux Review – The Best App for Anything Related to eBooks

I reviewed Calibre back when it was at version 0.8.24 and the 1.0 version was nowhere in sight. Even back then, the software was chock-full of features and options. It was difficult to imagine that it could bring even more improvements to the table, but it did. In fact, it's safe to say that a large number of eBook readers crossed paths with Calibre at one point or another, and it's likely that most of those users found what they had been looking for. Read more

FPGA-enabled vision system uses USB3 cams, runs Linux

NI unveiled a fanless, rugged vision computer that runs NI Linux on a quad-core Atom E3845, and offers an FPGA and support for 350MB/s USB3 Vision cameras. National Instruments (NI) has delivered its NI Linux Real-Time OS on a variety of embedded industrial computers and control systems, including its recent CompactRIO 4-slot Performance Controller. Now, the company is applying NI Linux to machine vision with its new USB3 Vision compatible NI CVS-1459RT. Read more

Fedora Might Try A New Scheduling Strategy For Its Releases

It's no secret that Fedora has had a challenging time sticking to their release schedules for a long time. With taking care of blocker bugs, Fedora Linux releases tend to frequently slip -- with Fedora 21 it's about two months behind schedule and we're just past the alpha stage. By the time Fedora 21 actually ships, Fedora 20 will have been at least twelve months old. However, a new release scheduling strategy might be tried starting with Fedora 22. Read more