Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Why MS Office 2007 is both a good and bad thing for OpenOffice.org

Filed under
OOo

OpenOffice.org (OOo) is, of course, the free software world’s complete office suite.

It’s not a bad program - it is certainly perfectly usable for a lot of standard productivity tasks. It sometimes is criticised, however, for various different things. Being bloated, being too much like Microsoft Office (related?), for not being enough like Microsoft Office, for not having good enough Word compatibility…

I like OpenOffice.org. I use it on my Linux desktop, and the NeoOffice port for Mac OS X as well.

Microsoft Office 2007 is upon us, however. With various new features and a few new additions to the suite, you would think it was just another incremental upgrade. Except that with the new version, Microsoft has introduced a new ‘ribbon’ UI to Office, banishing the old menubar and toolbar system.

Some people just love the new interface, citing improved productivity and clarity, while others aren’t so keen on it and see it as a diversion from UI conventions that isn’t so good.

For the ribbon haters who are currently using older versions of MS Office, this presents an interesting opportunity.

Full Story.

More in Tux Machines

Today in Techrights

Uselessd: A Stripped Down Version Of Systemd

The boycotting of systemd has led to the creation of uselessd, a new init daemon based off systemd that tries to strip out the "unnecessary" features. Uselessd in its early stages of development is systemd reduced to being a basic init daemon process with "the superfluous stuff cut out". Among the items removed are removing of journald, libudev, udevd, and superfluous unit types. Read more

Open source is not dead

I don’t think you can compare Red Hat to other Linux distributions because we are not a distribution company. We have a business model on Enterprise Linux. But I would compare the other distributions to Fedora because it’s a community-driven distribution. The commercially-driven distribution for Red Hat which is Enterprise Linux has paid staff behind it and unlike Microsoft we have a Security Response Team. So for example, even if we have the smallest security issue, we have a guaranteed resolution pattern which nobody else can give because everybody has volunteers, which is fine. I am not saying that the volunteers are not good people, they are often the best people in the industry but they have no hard commitments to fixing certain things within certain timeframes. They will fix it when they can. Most of those people are committed and will immediately get onto it. But as a company that uses open source you have no guarantee about the resolution time. So in terms of this, it is much better using Red Hat in that sense. It’s really what our business model is designed around; to give securities and certainties to the customers who want to use open source. Read more

10 Reasons to use open source software defined networking

Software-defined networking (SDN) is emerging as one of the fastest growing segments of open source software (OSS), which in itself is now firmly entrenched in the enterprise IT world. SDN simplifies IT network configuration and management by decoupling control from the physical network infrastructure. Read more