Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Copycat lawsuits target Intel

Filed under
Legal

On the heels of Advanced Micro Devices' antitrust litigation against Intel, the chip giant was hit Thursday with two copycat lawsuits.

In separate class actions filed in U.S. District Court in San Francisco, two owners of computers powered by Intel chips sought damages for what they claimed was the Santa Clara company's anti-competitive practices. Plaintiffs Ronald Konieczka of Cincinnati, Ohio, and Maria Prohias of Miami are represented by the same Los Angeles law firm, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro.

The plaintiffs allege they have been injured by paying more for PCs and other products which contain microprocessors due to Intel's alleged anti-competitive practices. They have asked the court for unspecified restitution.

On Monday, Sunnvayle-based AMD sued Intel in U.S. District Court in Delaware, contending the world's largest chip maker abuses its market power, engages in ``knee-capping'' tactics and offers illegal inducements to coerce computer makers into buying Intel's chips over AMD's.

Intel spokesman Tom Beermann said the class-action suits filed Thursday were not unexpected.

``These types of suits are fairly routine when a large antitrust case is filed,'' Beermann said. ``Intel is confident in its position, and we are firmly committed to successfully resolving these issues in court.''

The suits are nearly identical to the complaint AMD filed on Tuesday, with the same allegations, graphics and charts.

``The ambulance chasers are coming out,'' said Ashok Kumar, an analyst with Raymond James.

Attorneys for the plaintiffs weren't immediately available for comment.

Full Story.

More in Tux Machines

Evolving KDE: Lehman’s Laws of Software Evolution In The Community

The board of KDE eV has launched a new initiative to ensure that KDE remains awesome and relevant for the foreseeable future. Unlike previous approaches it is not a point-in-time solution, it is a continuous process of improvement. And it is a good thing. Previously, I have written/spoken a lot about the role of Brooks’ Law in the context of Free Software. Brooks’ Law teaches us to be careful about the management of growth in our communities. Especially treated in consideration with the grossly under appreciated Conway’s Law. There are, of course, other laws of Software Engineering that apply to Free Software development. Read more

How open source grew up

When I was writing daily about Linux, the operating system and open source apps were already hard at work in data centres, on servers and on high-end workstations. The IT market was still moving away from a model where servers came with an expensive to buy and expensive to support operating system linked to the hardware maker. Some of those OSes were fully proprietary. Others were versions of Unix although they often had proprietary branding and non-open components. Read more

F2FS For Linux 4.1 Has New Features & Fixes

New F2FS file-system features for this next kernel release include an in-memory extent_cache, an fs_shutdown feature to test power-off recovery, now uses inline_data to store a symlink path, F2FS is now shown as a non-misc file-system. Read more