Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Granular Linux - What Am I Missing?

Filed under
Linux
Reviews
-s

Granular Linux is a Linux distribution based on PCLinuxOS and features the XFCE4 and KDE desktops. It appears to have been in development since about the beginning of 2007 and has had one previous release. The developers of Granular have recently released a test of their upcoming .90 and I thought I'd see what it offered.

Like PCLinuxOS, it is delivered in an installable liveCD format. It uses customized graphics to distinguish itself from the start. The start splash features the same options as found on the PCLOS liveCD and I chose the default boot option. It takes a bit longer to boot than PCLOS, but it gets there. Like PCLinuxOS and Mandriva One, one is taken through a startup wizard to set the keyboard, timezone, and net connection. Again, like PCLOS, the wizard works wonderfully setting up my Ndiswrapper/Windows driver -dependent wireless chip.

At the login screen one has the choice of KDE, drake3D, and XFCE4. XFCE4 is the lastest stable version but isn't dressed up very much. With only a solid blue background and basic desktop icons, I was a bit bored with their XFCE4. In addition, some of the icons on the desktop are duplicated as XFCE4 uses same Desktop directory as KDE and any icons present on the KDE desktop are also seen in XFCE4. So, we have two Home and two File Manager icons. For a distro whose main feature is the choice of desktops, more attention should have been paid.

        


The livecd startup screen is customized, but it still looks very much like the openSUSE graphic from which it derives. The boot silent splash is understated and hip with it's mirror-image name, new Granular logo, and full-width progress bar. The KDE splash is even nicer, featuring a color matching background and circular progress icon layout. The KDE background is better than found in XFCE4, but it's still a bit ho-hum and doesn't match the theme found elsewhere. What's more, they didn't ship with any other choices. It's like the splash screens set the mood and builds some excitement, but then the wallpaper just lets you down. But this is just a pre-release and perhaps they have a matching wallpaper in the works.

        


Another claim to their originality is a "carefully selected set of applications for most tasks." I found this to be more or less true. They have removed OpenOffice for Koffice, I suppose to make room for XFCE4, and included what appears to be only one or two choices for any given task. They have shipped with the bulk of the KDE games, which is something for which PCLOS didn't have room.

Firefox and Konqueror are the web browsers, the Gimp is still there, Amarok and XMMS are included, Kaffiene and VLC are also found. There's K3b for disk creation. In the System menu we find Synaptic with PCLOS repositories setup and the Granular Control Center (the Mandriva Control Center with some customized graphics). I didn't find a hard drive installer in the menu or on the desktop. Perhaps it's only available in the root desktop as test releases of PCLOS 2007 were. In any case, you can invoke it from the commandline with /usr/sbin/draklive-installer. Here's a full package list.

        


Unique to Granular is the Granular customization menu. In it we find links to modules for changing out some splash screens, mouse cursor theme, window decorations, and installing granular packages (.grl). I must be blind because I wasn't able to locate any granular packages on their site to test this feature. Some of these modules are links to the KDE module, but some are granular original such as the Amarok Splash and Grub Splash tools.

Granular does ship with some nice original documentation. It includes all sorts of topics such as Basic Commands, Tutorials, and Tips and Tricks. There are also links to the Granular website which contain forums if its users need help. It's not real active right now, but perhaps it will pick up.

Like PCLOS, hardware detection was really good. Klaptop worked great for monitoring the battery and setting up the powersaving functions. I didn't test suspend and hiberate in the Granular liveCD mode, but I know I installed Kpowersave in PCLOS because those features worked better under it, so I imagine it'd be about the same here.

...Which leads me to my conclusion. I'm not sure that Granular really offers any advantage over PCLOS or SAM other than having both KDE and XFCE4 available on the liveCD (and thus immediately available after install) and if you prefer Koffice to OpenOffice.org. I like the graphics for Granular so far, but they need to complete the package. All in all, if you like PCLOS you'll probably like Granular as I can't really distinguish a whole lot of difference. Basically I walk away unexcited and thinking I must have overlooked something.

re: Granular

To me, this only re-enforces why too many distros is a bad thing.

Think of all the hours spent on the website and forum and graphic design (if that's what you want to call it) let only spinning the live CD and whatever other development they might have actually added to PCLinuxOS's code base and WOW why not help improve PCLinuxOS instead of duplicating 95%+ of the SAME EXACT EFFORT?

Instead, they waste man hours, clock cycles, and bandwidth doing pretty much the same damn thing.

I'm starting to think the rumor's true - Linux coders are a bunch of social mis-fits that can't figure out how to play well with others.

I think You're incorrect

This is still in beta. Come on It's their first real beta. For now they are just getting used to the way PCLinuxOS works. They have already started to implement their own touch on it, what more can you ask? When Novell took over SUSE the upcoming release 10.1 was awful, in my opinion there where a lot of hard major changes in a bug fix release. Also it was buggy. The secret is to be able to add what you want added without breaking the stability of the existing system, this may take some time. I'm also pretty sure that if the PCLinuxOS developers needed help in a certain area that the Granular team was focusing on then they would be more then willing to give feedback. It's not a competition, but the two distributions may have different ideas as to what they want to use a distribution for. Yes there maybe some fan boyishness in the non developers community but for the most part (there are some exceptions) if I was to post on the SUSE mailing list (Almost any Linux mailing list) about a specific patch to Greg or whoever they would help me out. It's not that every distribution serves the same purpose and they are all copies. Everyone is different maybe not in looks but in purpose and it takes a different mindset to understand this. It's actually more of a positive then a negative if you really know what's going on behind the scenes. No matter if they mean to or not distributions help each other and learn from one another. It's a constant growing organism.

Very buggy Beta installer

Well i gave it a shot but i see no reason to change pclinux for this one and the installer is very buggy, DO NOT istall on your main computer. The only working installation is if you use the whole disk, if you try the other options you'll get a corrupted partition, and always an ext2 format regardless of what you chose. Goodbye windows partition or whatever is in the same disk. I have tested a lot of betas in my test machine but granular's installer was the most destructive. You need to address this for the final guys.

Yes you are missing the joy of ROOT!!

What I think is most of the reviewer of Distros has the habit of influenced by the like of popular distros, before evoluting the new distros.. PCLOS in its birth has meet the same fate in its earlier days.. which the new distro Granular.90 is struggling now.. I have installed Granular.90 in my 1.Ghz slow sempron 2200+ running inthe old KM266 VIA based mother board, along with Windows XP and eight other distros including PCL,and SAM. as I installed GRUB in the MBR I have to add other distros and windows by editing the menu.lst.. it splash screen is more brighter than PCLOS but boot in the same speed as of PCLOS..

It seem the author of the review has completely forget to log as root and enjoy the most enjoyable distro that emerge as ever..Pl. log in as root then report here ..You must included the screenshots of KDE after logging in as root..it simply sent you in fantastical world!!

I fully agree with the XFCE , SAM is more better distro to in this case.

with regards,
vaithy

Granular1 is not 0.9, it is ready!

I test them all. I really do. I want every distro to do quite some different things and I require it on several totally different pc's. Only a few distro's managed till now: Mint4 and MEPIS7. I played with Mandriva, PCLinuxOS and SAM, but after all the testing, Granular is showing up ánd staying on every pc in the house. Every video- and screen-setting is recognized without hassle, audio just works, codecs are just there and working too, WINE is easily installed, progs like Frontpage do their job without hesitation nor freezing. Thát's what I want!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More in Tux Machines

Leftovers: OSS

  • Anonymous Open Source Projects
    He made it clear he is not advocating for this view, just a thought experiment. I had, well, a few thoughts on this. I tend to think of open source projects in three broad buckets. Firstly, we have the overall workflow in which the community works together to build things. This is your code review processes, issue management, translations workflow, event strategy, governance, and other pieces. Secondly, there are the individual contributions. This is how we assess what we want to build, what quality looks like, how we build modularity, and other elements. Thirdly, there is identity which covers the identity of the project and the individuals who contribute to it. Solomon taps into this third component.
  • Ostatic and Archphile Are Dead
    I’ve been meaning to write about the demise of Ostatic for a month or so now, but it’s not easy to put together an article when you have absolutely no facts. I first noticed the site was gone a month or so back, when an attempt to reach it turned up one of those “this site can’t be reached” error messages. With a little checking, I was able to verify that the site has indeed gone dark, with writers for the site evidently losing access to their content without notice. Other than that, I’ve been able to find out nothing. Even the site’s ownership is shrouded in mystery. The domain name is registered to OStatic Inc, but with absolutely no information about who’s behind the corporation, which has a listed address of 500 Beale Street in San Francisco. I made an attempt to reach someone using the telephone number included in the results of a “whois” search, but have never received a reply from the voicemail message I left. Back in the days when FOSS Force was first getting cranked up, Ostatic was something of a goto site for news and commentary on Linux and open source. This hasn’t been so true lately, although Susan Linton — the original publisher of Tux Machines — continued to post her informative and entertaining news roundup column on the site until early February — presumably until the end. I’ve reached out to Ms. Linton, hoping to find out more about the demise of Ostatic, but haven’t received a reply. Her column will certainly be missed.
  • This Week In Creative Commons History
    Since I'm here at the Creative Commons 2017 Global Summit this weekend, I want to take a break from our usual Techdirt history posts and highlight the new State Of The Commons report that has been released. These annual reports are a key part of the CC community — here at Techdirt, most of our readers already understand the importance of the free culture licensing options that CC provides to creators, but it's important to step back and look at just how much content is being created and shared thanks to this system. It also provides some good insight into exactly how people are using CC licenses, through both data and (moreso than in previous years) close-up case studies. In the coming week we'll be taking a deeper dive into some of the specifics of the report and this year's summit, but for now I want to highlight a few key points — and encourage you to check out the full report for yourself.
  • ASU’s open-source 'library of the stars' to be enhanced by NSF grant
  • ASU wins record 14 NSF career awards
    Arizona State University has earned 14 National Science Foundation early career faculty awards, ranking second among all university recipients for 2017 and setting an ASU record. The awards total $7 million in funding for the ASU researchers over five years.

R1Soft's Backup Backport, TrustZone CryptoCell in Linux

  • CloudLinux 6 Gets New Beta Kernel to Backport a Fix for R1Soft's Backup Solution
    After announcing earlier this week the availability of a new Beta kernel for CloudLinux 7 and CloudLinux 6 Hybrid users, CloudLinux's Mykola Naugolnyi is now informing us about the release of a Beta kernel for CloudLinux 6 users. The updated CloudLinux 6 Beta kernel is tagged as build 2.6.32-673.26.1.lve1.4.26 and it's here to replace kernel 2.6.32-673.26.1.lve1.4.25. It is available right now for download from CloudLinux's updates-testing repository and backports a fix (CKSIX-109) for R1Soft's backup solution from CloudLinux 7's kernel.
  • Linux 4.12 To Begin Supporting TrustZone CryptoCell
    The upcoming Linux 4.12 kernel cycle plans to introduce support for CryptoCell hardware within ARM's TrustZone.

Lakka 2.0 stable release!

After 6 months of community testing, we are proud to announce Lakka 2.0! This new version of Lakka is based on LibreELEC instead of OpenELEC. Almost every package has been updated! We are now using RetroArch 1.5.0, which includes so many changes that listing everything in a single blogpost is rather difficult. Read more Also: LibreELEC-Based Lakka 2.0 Officially Released with Raspberry Pi Zero W Support

Leftovers: Gaming