Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Intel lawsuit could cost billions

Filed under
Legal

NTEL, the computer chip giant accused of abusing its market power, could face damages of more than $3.2 billion (€2.66 billion), and see its sales drop by $4.4 billion a year, according to a Wall Street analysis.

Tad LaFountain of Wells Fargo Securities, a division of one of America's biggest banks, has estimated there is at least a 75% probability that Intel will lose the legal case brought last month by Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), its smaller competitor.

LaFountain based his judgment on the detailed specifics of AMD's claim, and on a recent ruling against Intel's alleged anti-competitive practices in Japan.

Intel is one of the biggest multinational employers in Ireland, with 4,800 staff working at its Leixlip campus in Kildare.

The manufacturer - perhaps best known for its Pentium computer chips - had estimated sales of €3.5 billion from its Irish business last year. The Kildare facility is the company's fourth largest manufacturing site overall and the largest outside of America.

Should LaFountain's dismal prognosis for Intel turn out to be near the mark, it could endanger the expected announcement of plans to build Fab 24.2, a €2 billion chip-making plant that is expected to employ up to 500 people. Intel Ireland confirmed earlier this year that it had been gearing up to win the contract by securing planning permission for such a plant.

A final announcement on the location of the new research and manufacturing facility is anticipated by the end of the year. Construction is expected to begin early next year, and be completed within 18 to 24 months.

It is also unclear what the implications would be for Intel's current production facilities in Kildare, particularly its €1.6 billion investment in the latest Fab 24 plant, which is due to come into production next year.

AMD lost market share to Intel between 2001 and 2004 - a time when, in the view of many experts, AMD's microprocessors had established a technological lead over Intel. AMD blames the financial incentives that Intel allegedly offered to computer makers and retailers, causing it to lose business it should have won.

LaFountain has attempted to estimate the loss of sales AMD suffered as a consequence. If Intel is forced to amend its aggressive marketing practices, LaFountain estimates it could suffer a 20-25% fall in its profits - or about $2 billion a year.

In his report, LaFountain wrote: "We believe that the exclusivity that Intel sought with the actions described in AMD's complaint became a drug, and that substituting potentially dubious/questionable/illegal marketing actions for market-expanding product development eviscerated Intel's corporate soul."

Intel has rejected AMD's claim. Chuck Molloy, a spokesman, said LaFountain's estimates "are just back-of-the- envelope guesses and assume a factual basis to the AMD claims that we deny".

Last week, EU competition officials raided Intel's offices as part of its own investigation into AMD's allegations.

Source.

The means justify the end...screw Intel

Got to this a bit late but I gotta say, I hope Intel takes the entire size 12 right up the old chute. I know squat about the deal they are getting hammered with in this article but I do know that Intel has just turned the keys of DRM over to Microsoft. To make matters worse, It would make playing a wmv or many of the video codec driven movies illegal on Linux.....anywhere! Not just in America. I don't have the url here in front of me but google "inquirer intel drm" and its right there on top.

This is scary folks.

helios

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More in Tux Machines

EXT4 fscrypt vs. eCryptfs vs. LUKS dm-crypt Benchmarks

Given the recent advancements of the EXT4 file-system with its native file-system encryption support provided by the fscrypt framework, here are benchmarks comparing the performance of an EXT4 file-system with no encryption, fscrypt-based encryption, eCryptfs-based encryption, and a LUKS dm-crypt encrypted volume. Read more

Debian GNU/Linux 8 "Jessie" Has Reached End of Security Support, Upgrade Now

Released more than three years ago, on April 25, 2015, Debian GNU/Linux 8 "Jessie" is currently considered the "oldstable" Debian branch since the release of the Debian GNU/Linux 9 "Stretch" operating system series precisely a year ago, on June 17, 2017. As such, Debian GNU/Linux 8 "Jessie" has now reached end of life and will no longer receive regular security support beginning June 17, 2018. Security support for Debian GNU/Linux 8 "Jessie" will be handed over to the Debian LTS team now that LTS (Long Term Support) support has ended for Debian GNU/Linux 7 "Wheezy" on May 31, 2018. Debian GNU/Linux 8 "Jessie" will start receiving additional support from the Debian LTS project starting today, but only for a limited number of packages and architectures like i386, amd64, armel, and armhf. Read more

openSUSE Tumbleweed Is Now Powered by Linux Kernel 4.17, KDE Plasma 5.13 Landed

As of today, the openSUSE Tumbleweed rolling operating system is now powered by the latest and most advanced Linux 4.17 kernel series, which landed in the most recent snapshot released earlier. Tumbleweed snapshot 20180615 was released today, June 17, 2018, and it comes only two days after snapshot 20180613, which added the Mesa 18.1.1 graphics stack and KDE Plasma 5.13 desktop environment, along with many components of the latest KDE Applications 18.04.2 software suite. Today's snapshot 20180615 continued upgrading the KDE Applications software suite to version 18.04.2, but it also upgraded the kernel from Linux 4.16.12 to Linux 4.17.1. As such, OpenSuSE Tumbleweed is now officially powered by Linux kernel 4.17, so upgrading your installs as soon as possible would be a good idea. Read more

today's howtos and leftovers