Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Open Source Consultancy Takes Complaint Against Microsoft To ACCC

Filed under
OSS

Open source consultancy Cybersource is filing a formal complaint with the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) this week claiming Microsoft is engaging in unfair practices which is costing end users $200 million a year.

Accusing Microsoft of stifling competition in the marketplace, Cybersource will provide the ACCC with a whitepaper entitled, The Cost of Software Monopoly: How Australian Consumers Lose. It will be accompanied by a formal complaint.

Cybersource managing director Con Zymaris said users are suffering from a lack of competition in the desktop market and Microsoft is blocking the progress of viable alternatives such as Linux.
"In fact, over $1 billion has been sucked out of Australian customers' pockets just these past five years alone," he said.

The formal complaint requests that an operating system be sold unbundled from hardware and seeks a level playing field for software vendors in the Australian education space.

"Microsoft has a long history of bullying PC vendors who have dared to introduce alternatives to Microsoft on the desktop... we don't know if the PC vendors' hands are tied by invisible shackles orchestrated by Microsoft," Zymaris said.

"However, having the ACCC ensure that the 'no operating system' option is made available is the only way to find out; vendors have always been too scared to act on their own against Microsoft.

"In areas where vendors do not pre-install a Microsoft operating system, for example the server market, Linux has gained around 30 percent of the market and it has led to an increasingly fierce and competitive battle, as should be the case. We want the same battle to occur on the desktop as this can only benefit customers through better products at lower prices."

Zymaris wants education departments across Australia to review their procurement procedures claiming that when they go to tender it is only to select which Microsoft reseller they purchase Microsoft products from instead of seeking out alternatives.

A spokesman for Microsoft Australia was unwilling to comment on the ACCC complaint or respond to the whitepaper.

By MICHAEL CRAWFORD
COMPUTERWORLD

More in Tux Machines

Fedora 25 Review: A Stable Release, But Slightly Slow to Boot (on rotational disks)

If you have a rotational disk, then Fedora 25 will be a little slow to boot and there is nothing you or I can do to fix it. But if you have an SSD, then you shall have no issues here. Other than that, I’m quite pleased with this release actually. Sure the responsiveness sucked the first time on, but as mentioned, it can be fixed, permanently. And the stability is also excellent. While I’m not a huge fan of the GNOMEShell (I think it’s stupid!), the ‘Classic’ session is also available, nonetheless. If you fancy giving it a go, then get it from here, but first make sure to read the release notes. Read more

KDE Leftovers

Parental Controls for Linux Unleashed

For years, one of the overlooked areas for the Linux desktop was access to “effective” parental controls. Back in 2003, I remember the now defunct Linspire (then known as Lindows) offered a proprietary option called SurfSafe. Surprisingly, at least back then, the product worked very well in providing accurate content filtering capabilities; something that was not,in fact, available and easy-to-use at that time. Years later, an open-source alternative was released to the greater Linux community known as GNOME Nanny. Fantastic in terms of usage control, its web content web filter was laughably terrible. As expected, crowd-sourcing a filtering list isn’t a great solution. And like SurfSafe, the project is now defunct. Read more

Chapeau 24 Cancellara - Same same but different

Fedora plus Moka icons plus some extra software, mainly coming from proprietary sources. I guess that's the best way to describe Chapeau. But then, what separates one distro from another if not a collection of decorations, as software is essentially the same, apart from a very small number of standalone distributions trying to develop their own identity with their own desktop environments and app stack, re: elementary or Solus + Budgie? Except they struggle, too. Chapeau 24 is a nice effort to make Fedora friendlier, but then it does not achieve the needed result without pain. The biggest issues included a botched smartphone support. Samba woes and the horrible bootloader bug. Other than that, it behaved more or less the same way as the parent distro. Then again, why bother if you can pimp up Fedora without any loss of functionality? I do like Chapeau Cancellara, but I cannot ignore the fact Fedora does the same with fewer problems. All in all, it's a welcome effort, but it needs more polish. It does not quite capture the heart the way Fuduntu did. And with some issues looming high above the distro, the grade can only be about 6/10. Most importantly, the bootloader setup must be flawless, and there's not excuse for small app errors that we've seen. We know it can do more. Anyhow, if you're not keen on any self-service round Fedora, this could be a good test bed for your games. A moderately worthy if somewhat risky and flawed experience. Read more