Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Krusader - The Ultimate KDE File Manager

Filed under
KDE

Years ago when I switched to using Freebsd and KDE full time, I found myself in a quandary. I was in need of a file manager. I found that Konqueror was the primary file manager for KDE. So I tried it. However, I found that Konqueror did not do as good a job as a file manager as I had hoped, even in explorer mode. So I began searching around for a better file manager to allow me to manage my files in KDE. During my testing I tried several different programs, none of which really gave me what I wanted, especially the ones with explorer type interfaces. Then I stumbled onto Krusader, a file manager that really does things right. But don't take my word for it. Let's go look at all the great things it offers.

The first thing you'll notice when you open up Krusader is its dual pane design. These side by side windows provide you with easy file copying and quick file management. The tabbed design also allows you to have more than just two panes open at one time. If I'm doing any kind of site development, updating, file handling or more, I'm usually using anywhere between five and ten tabbed windows at any one time in Krusader. Believe it or not, the "explorer" method of file browsing and management actually isn't the better way to go. In my experience I've used both kinds of interfaces and the Krusader interface is much easier to work with. Sure, it's got a few quirks I wish it didn't have, but aside from those few quirks, it's very solid and does what it needs to do very well.

More Here




More in Tux Machines

Uselessd: A Stripped Down Version Of Systemd

The boycotting of systemd has led to the creation of uselessd, a new init daemon based off systemd that tries to strip out the "unnecessary" features. Uselessd in its early stages of development is systemd reduced to being a basic init daemon process with "the superfluous stuff cut out". Among the items removed are removing of journald, libudev, udevd, and superfluous unit types. Read more

Open source is not dead

I don’t think you can compare Red Hat to other Linux distributions because we are not a distribution company. We have a business model on Enterprise Linux. But I would compare the other distributions to Fedora because it’s a community-driven distribution. The commercially-driven distribution for Red Hat which is Enterprise Linux has paid staff behind it and unlike Microsoft we have a Security Response Team. So for example, even if we have the smallest security issue, we have a guaranteed resolution pattern which nobody else can give because everybody has volunteers, which is fine. I am not saying that the volunteers are not good people, they are often the best people in the industry but they have no hard commitments to fixing certain things within certain timeframes. They will fix it when they can. Most of those people are committed and will immediately get onto it. But as a company that uses open source you have no guarantee about the resolution time. So in terms of this, it is much better using Red Hat in that sense. It’s really what our business model is designed around; to give securities and certainties to the customers who want to use open source. Read more

10 Reasons to use open source software defined networking

Software-defined networking (SDN) is emerging as one of the fastest growing segments of open source software (OSS), which in itself is now firmly entrenched in the enterprise IT world. SDN simplifies IT network configuration and management by decoupling control from the physical network infrastructure. Read more

Only FOSSers ‘Get’ FOSS

Back on the first of September I wrote an article about Android, in which I pointed out that Google’s mobile operating system seems to be primarily designed to help sell things. This eventually led to a discussion thread on a subreddit devoted to Android. Needless to say, the fanbois and fangrrls over on Reddit didn’t cotton to my criticism and they devoted a lot of space complaining about how the article was poorly written. Read more