I dunno what people say when they talk about RPM hell

Filed under
Software

When people talk about RPM dependency hell, I really have no idea what they’re talking about. Here’s a factual look into RPM that should set the record straight:

The strengths of RPM

* No indirections — 100% of the times, the manifest corresponds to the installed files. Have you seen dpkg detours/indirections (dunno their name in English)?
* Built-in integrity checking. rpm -V. Can’t get any easier than that.
* The dependency system is cleaner.

More Here




A primer into software package management using RPM

Since apparently my last article ignited a small flamewar, let’s talk a bit about package management in RPM-based distros. Yeah, Fedora, Red Hat, SuSE, Mandrake, those. And when I say package management, all I mean is software installation, really.

This will be a command-line tutorial-style article, and we’re gonna get down to basics, so no GUIs or automated installatinos from the Internet (automated dependency management) here. I will, however, make a recommendation as to which dependency management system you should use, because nowadays it would be rather insane to do the following work manually — except for very particular cases in which this tutorial will come in very handy.

More Here

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.