Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Debate Over the Size of the Web

Filed under
Web

How big is the World Wide Web? Many Internet engineers consider that query one of those imponderable philosophical questions, like how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.

But the question about the size of the Web came under intense debate last week after Yahoo announced at an Internet search engine conference in Santa Clara, Calif., that its search engine index - an accounting of the number of documents that can be located from its databases - had reached 19.2 billion.

Because the number was more than twice as large as the number of documents (8.1 billion) currently reported by Google, Yahoo's fierce competitor and Silicon Valley neighbor, the announcement - actually a brief mention in a Yahoo company Web log - set off a spat. Google questioned the way its rival was counting its numbers.

Sergey Brin, Google's co-founder, suggested that the Yahoo index was inflated with duplicate entries in such a way as to cut its effectiveness despite its large size.

"The comprehensiveness of any search engine should be measured by real Web pages that can be returned in response to real search queries and verified to be unique," he said on Friday. "We report the total index size of Google based on this approach."

But Yahoo executives stood by their earlier statement. "The number of documents in our index is accurate," Jeff Weiner, senior vice president of Yahoo's search and marketplace group, said on Saturday. "We're proud of the accomplishments of our search engineers and scientists and look forward to continuing to satisfy our users by delivering the world's highest-quality search experience."

The scope of Internet search engines, and thus indirectly the size of the Internet, has long been a lively area of computer science research and debate.

Moreover, all camps in the discussion are quick to note that index size is only loosely - and possibly even somewhat inversely - related to the quality of results returned.

The major commercial search engines use software programs known as Web crawlers to scour the Internet systematically for documents and index them.

The indexes themselves are maintained as arcane structures of computer data that permit the search engines to return lists of hundreds of answers in fractions of a second when Web users enter terms like "Britney Spears" or "Iraq and weapons of mass destruction."

On Sunday, researchers at the National Center for Supercomputer Applications attempted to shed light on the debate by performing a large number of random searches on both indices. They ran a random sample of 10,012 queries and concluded that Google, on average, returned 166.9 percent more results than Yahoo. In only three percent of the cases did the Yahoo searches return more queries than Google. The group said the Yahoo index claim was suspicious.

Neither Yahoo nor Google makes public the software algorithms that underlie their collection methods. In fact, those details are closely guarded secrets, which lie near the heart of heated competition now going on between Google, Yahoo and Microsoft over who can provide the most relevant answers to a user's query.

"It's a little bit silly," said Christopher Manning, a Stanford University professor who teaches a course on information retrieval. "It's difficult, and the whole question of how big indexes are has clearly become extremely political and commercial."

Even if the methodology is unclear, there is no shortage of outside speculation about what the different numbers mean, if anything.

Jean Veronis, a linguist in France and director of the Centre Informatique pour les Lettres et Sciences Humaines, posted a discussion on a blog noting that the increase in Yahoo references in French appeared consistent with the larger overall number that Yahoo was now reporting.

He added a caveat, however. "All of this should of course be taken with a large pinch of salt," he wrote. "So far, I haven't quite caught Yahoo red-handed when it comes to fiddling the books, but this could simply be because they are smarter with their figures than their competitors ;-)"

In contrast, a fellow blogger, Akash Jain, did his own random query test and wrote that it appeared that Google's index remained about 50 percent larger.

Other search engine specialists remained skeptical about the ability to estimate Web or index size as long as the search engines were being secretive about their methods. "I don't have any good way of checking," said Raul Valdes-Perez, a computer scientist who is chief executive of Vivisimo, which operates the Clusty search engine. "It feels a little like Harvard and Yale decided to argue over who has the most books in their respective libraries."

By JOHN MARKOFF
The New York Times

More in Tux Machines

Leaked videos, screenshots reveal an HTC One running Android Lollipop

No, you won’t get this gift in time for Christmas, but perhaps seeing an HTC One running Lollipop may make the wait slightly less painful. A batch of videos and screenshots show HTC’s flagship with the newest build of Android, though of course it’s merged with the Sense 6.0 user interface (the HTC One currently runs Sense 5.0). We got a small hint of how Lollipop looks on the One in November, but this leak lays out what the entire operating system makeover looks in clearer detail. Read more

The winning Linux kernel live patch: All of the above

Life's choices often amount to one of two options: Linux or Windows? Android or iOS? Kgraft or Kpatch? That last pair consists of the two major contenders for the technology Linux could use for live kernel patches. Now a winner is in, and it amounts to all of the above. According to a post on the official Linux kernel developer's mailing list, a kernel patching system that works with both Kgraft and Kpatch and uses "core functionality abstracted out of [those] already existing implementations" has been proposed as an addition to the Linux 3.20 kernel. Read more

UNIX Industry Banks on Linux Strategies

Struggling UNIX server makers are strengthening their Linux strategy in line with the open-source application environment. The move is aimed at maintaining remaining customers, since users are increasingly abandoning UNIX servers. However, it is receiving a lukewarm response from the market. According to industry sources on Dec. 22, server vendors such as IBM and HP are concentrating on the development of products so that the Linux operating system and related applications can be used as UNIX servers. Read more

Mageia Beta Delayed, Christmas Quiz, and 7 Best Alternatives

Today in Linux news the Mageia project announced another delay in version 5 Beta 2. The Linux Voice is running a Linux quiz for Christmas and Gary Newell offers up his list of the seven best alternative Linux distributions of the year. The Register says 2015 will be the year of Linux - on mobile. Three reviews need to be highlighted and, finally today, Matt Hartley says everyone should switch to Ubuntu MATE. Read more Also: Linux Bloat, Linux Lite, and Devuan Update