Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Why Dolphin should have tabs

Filed under
Linux

According to the Dolphin webpage, Dolphin is: "a file manager for KDE focusing on usability." To expand; from my experiences with it, along with words from developers, Dolphin is a light-weight file-manager, meant to be strictly used for file-browsing. It is not meant to be a replacement for Konqueror. Konqueror, however, in KDE 4 will be the "power user" tool..made for more experienced linux/kde users. It will not be the default file-browser; Dolphin will.

While it all sounds very interesting, and from my experience, Dolphin seems to be progressing steadily, I still have a few concerns. However, my main issue, is the fact that the majority of the developers are against adding tabs.

The proposal for adding tabs, was posted in this thread http://lists.kde.org/?l=kfm-devel&m=118373314623787&w=2 , however it was quickly shot down by many of the developers. For instance, one said: "Ouch, honestly it doesn’t look like a good idea to me. It’ll be yet another setting for a feature you can already have elsewhere. "

Now I ask..is that really the case? Is it really yet another feature you can get elsewhere? Well, yes..Konqueror does indeed have tabs...

..but, should that disqualify tabs from being added? Does the fact that Konqueror has tabs make it so adding them to a filebrowser would be pointless? Would adding tabs to Dolphin make it less or more functional as a filebrowser? You tell me.

Let's look at it another way. Konqueror, as a "power user tool," has many different view options. You can have a tree view..a column view, etc. But..what do you know? So can Dolphin! Why? Because it makes things more convenient for different people. Do you really NEED a multi-column view in Dolphin when Konqueror can already do that? Technically, no..you don't NEED columns in Dolphin to be a standard file browser. You COULD just open new windows. But, like I said, it was added anyway..and for a good reason. Yet, if this useful feature is added, then why aren't tabs?

Essentially, tabs don't HAVE to be added. Nor' does one HAVE to have a MultiColumn view. However, there are some things..despite the fact that you can get them with other programs, that can be added to make things easier for the end user. In my view, tabs can (and do) generally enhance the FILE-BROWSING experience. And besides, isn't that the point of Dolphin; to be a functional and simple FILE-BROWSER? I for one, prefer tabs over multiple windows, and I know many do as well. Multiple windows for me, are annoying, cluttered, and over-all disorganized. Plus, opening a simple tab is much cleaner and more functional than opening a new window; a new window that can soon be lost behind the many other apps you have open (if you're a multi-tasker like myself!).

Overall, I think tabs should be added to Dolphin. While granted, it isn't a HAVE TO feature(neither is multi-column view), it is a feature that can help keep things for FILE-BROWSING neat, organized, and easier for the end-user. Plus, most applications now days have tabs, and most people just automatically look for them. Tabs ARE NOT a power-user feature, infact they've become just one of those "common sense" things; one of those things that have been proven to be very useful.

Personally, I'm not sure why the developers are so hell-bent on keeping tabs away from Dolphin; but I will say this: listen to the every-day kde user. Don't rely completely on philosophies or technical concepts. Don't cloud your mind with what's best for YOU. Instead, listen to the users; put yourself in their shoes. From the responses I've seen on several forums and blogs, I think it’s pretty apparent that most people want tabs. In my eyes, tabs are a standard feature that should be added; not with the purpose of making things more complex or bloated, but to add simplicity — which I thought, was the point of dolphin.

And finally, I'm not saying add every feature under the sun..and add a google bar, and turn Dolphin into Konqueror the second. No. I'm saying use common sense, and make Dolphin (especially since it will be the default file-browser) functional, smart, and easy to use.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Dolphin deficiencies

Konqueror is a better file manager than Dolphin; perhaps we should not disdain the Dolphin developers for pushing us toward a better alternative.

On the other hand, a significant part of Konqueror's superiority stems from multiple tabs. To get similar functionality without tabs, it is necessary to create a far less easily managed pile of windows.

Light weight is fine, as long as it doesn't make a mess. Right now, Dolphin is messy. A file manager without tabs is like a file clerk without arms. You can get there eventually, but it takes a lot more trips.

re: Dolphin deficiencies

So does this mean that the KDE 4 developers are no longer using Dolphin "inside" of the Konqueror shell, when you run the command "konqueror --profile filemanagement"? (if you know what I mean.)

Never mind, the question's been answered; they're apparently going to keep Konqueror's file manager the way it is. (Unless some KDE 4 dev changes his/her mind, that is.)

I don't use tabs in the Konqueror file manager. But the point is, Dolphin (at least the version in the last KDE Four Live CD) sucks rocks in comparison to Konqueror. Konqueror isn't that complicated, and I personally don't see Dolphin's reason for existence.

And I'm really starting to get pissed off at the KDE 4 developers who are making all these design decisions because they think they're good for us. Every single time someone criticizes their work, it seems like their first retort is, "Can you write code? No? Then STFU."

Maybe we'll know KDE's really grown up when there's separate groups of people who write code and who design applications and the UI, and the latter's "in charge" of the former. I think that's the real issue here.

(Maybe when all is said and done, I'll be embarrassed at my KDE 4 rants. I hope so.)

I agree completely

I agree completely eco2geek.

I've also ran into that "if you can't code, shut up" attitude. THIS is the attitude that keeps linux from going mainstream..or atleast, it's what holds it back. Not everyone can code, but that doesn't make their opinions/suggestions any less important. Infact, I'd like to think that the every day end-user IS what's truly important.

I also agree about Dolphin as a whole. I really don't see it's reason for existence either. From what I've heard however, is that the konqueror code was so messy and horrible they decided to use dolphin to make things easier. I'm not entirely sure how accurate that is, but I wouldn't doubt it. None-the-less, if Dolphin is going to be the default file-browser, they need to make it reasonably functional, and use-able for everyone (as a file-browser). As stated in my main article, I don't see how tabs are a "power user" function, nor' do I see the reason for NOT including them. Even aside from that, I really think developers need to listen to the ever-day user, and I mean this not about tabs, but in general.

KDE4 Issues

eco2geek--don't know whether you'll be embarrassed at your KDE4 rants. I'm in agreement with your observations.

I know how difficult development can be, and I've struggled to keep silent about my own concerns regarding KDE4 development. I do try to keep up by trying out the various betas and release candidates and reading dot.kde.org and www.planetkde.org. What I've tried and seen and read haven't been encouraging.

It looks like KDE4 will suffer in comparison to KDE3 in features, and perhaps also in post-application-launch performance (read Jos Poortvliet's blog series regarding performance issues in KDE4 here).

Some of the KDE developers have not taken criticism well (of course, not many people in this universe take criticism well, but some handle it outwardly a little better than others). I too have taken offense at snotty "retorts" from some KDE4 developers, whose comments have done nothing to help promote KDE.

Here's hoping that the impending KDE4.0 release is a good enough release to use on a daily basis, and that the KDE4.1 release follows quickly and is the blockbuster release in terms of features and performance it ought to be.

RE: KDE4 Issues

gfranken wrote:
Here's hoping that the impending KDE4.0 release is a good enough release to use on a daily basis, and that the KDE4.1 release follows quickly and is the blockbuster release in terms of features and performance it ought to be.

I'm hoping too. The release date is coming up pretty quick. It's getting there..but still, alot of functionality is definitely missing..atleast judging by the last beta.

More in Tux Machines

Fedora 25 Review: A Stable Release, But Slightly Slow to Boot (on rotational disks)

If you have a rotational disk, then Fedora 25 will be a little slow to boot and there is nothing you or I can do to fix it. But if you have an SSD, then you shall have no issues here. Other than that, I’m quite pleased with this release actually. Sure the responsiveness sucked the first time on, but as mentioned, it can be fixed, permanently. And the stability is also excellent. While I’m not a huge fan of the GNOMEShell (I think it’s stupid!), the ‘Classic’ session is also available, nonetheless. If you fancy giving it a go, then get it from here, but first make sure to read the release notes. Read more

KDE Leftovers

Parental Controls for Linux Unleashed

For years, one of the overlooked areas for the Linux desktop was access to “effective” parental controls. Back in 2003, I remember the now defunct Linspire (then known as Lindows) offered a proprietary option called SurfSafe. Surprisingly, at least back then, the product worked very well in providing accurate content filtering capabilities; something that was not,in fact, available and easy-to-use at that time. Years later, an open-source alternative was released to the greater Linux community known as GNOME Nanny. Fantastic in terms of usage control, its web content web filter was laughably terrible. As expected, crowd-sourcing a filtering list isn’t a great solution. And like SurfSafe, the project is now defunct. Read more

Chapeau 24 Cancellara - Same same but different

Fedora plus Moka icons plus some extra software, mainly coming from proprietary sources. I guess that's the best way to describe Chapeau. But then, what separates one distro from another if not a collection of decorations, as software is essentially the same, apart from a very small number of standalone distributions trying to develop their own identity with their own desktop environments and app stack, re: elementary or Solus + Budgie? Except they struggle, too. Chapeau 24 is a nice effort to make Fedora friendlier, but then it does not achieve the needed result without pain. The biggest issues included a botched smartphone support. Samba woes and the horrible bootloader bug. Other than that, it behaved more or less the same way as the parent distro. Then again, why bother if you can pimp up Fedora without any loss of functionality? I do like Chapeau Cancellara, but I cannot ignore the fact Fedora does the same with fewer problems. All in all, it's a welcome effort, but it needs more polish. It does not quite capture the heart the way Fuduntu did. And with some issues looming high above the distro, the grade can only be about 6/10. Most importantly, the bootloader setup must be flawless, and there's not excuse for small app errors that we've seen. We know it can do more. Anyhow, if you're not keen on any self-service round Fedora, this could be a good test bed for your games. A moderately worthy if somewhat risky and flawed experience. Read more