Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Apple vs. Microsoft vs. Linux: Good vs. Evil and Do You Really Care?

Filed under
OS

If you follow big companies closely, you will find they have moments where they do things that are amazing, and moments where you wonder what rock they crawled out from under.

Apple sucks at PR, but is blessed with one of the best marketing organizations on the planet and a group of fans that attack detractors like rabid dogs.

Microsoft has mixed PR (it uses three firms that are poorly coordinated). I sometimes wonder if it can spell “marketing,”and Microsoft has had the word “evil,” as in “evil empire,” associated with its name for nearly two decades. Yet it has nearly unmatched positional power in the tech industry.

Linux has no PR to speak of, and the marketing is almost non-existent (makes you wonder how all of us would stay in business if it was a Linux world – who pays for the ads?). It is championed by fans that have been known to be even more rabid than the Apple fan base, although they have slowed over the years.

More Here




Enderle Alert

Readers beware. That's the same guy who compares Linux users to zealots and 9/11 terrorists. He does business with Microsoft (among clients).

Right

Yeah, Enderle hates Linux and Linux users. I first encountered his ideas when reading about the SCO case at Groklaw. He purports to be an "industry analyst", whereas "microsoft shill" might be a more accurate designation.

If it didn't come from you

I almost would have believed it.

Really, Schestowitz deals in slander, paranoia and conspiracy theories without delivering the slightest proof - so better don't believe a word he says, it's probably pure character-assasination.

Oh, look, it's 'eet'

Hey 'eet',

Still staying out of my sites? No longer willing to compare us to Germany circa 1940? If you look around, you'll see that I'm passionately pro-Linux and I haven't affiliation with Linux companies or Microsoft.

One look at your blog

will remind everyone strongly of the National Enquirer. Minus the humanitarian stance and good journalism of course... Censoring critical comments and claiming that they all come from me is also quite revealing to your readers, I guess...

And yes, those tasteless graphics and constant trademark-misuse on your website, as well as your constant talk about 'impurity', 'infections', 'treason' and 'conspiracy', remind me very strongly not of Germany's 40s but of the election-campaigning style in Germany in the 20s and early 30s.

Roy, if you want your credibility back (in case you ever had any) start by not using stupid and aggressive propaganda imagery.

You could then slowly proceed to not accusing members of the GNOME board of being corrupt.

Until then, better keep your mouth shut.

Accusations?

Most accusations are just coming from you and they are mostly baseless. As for the imagery, it's there to express the truth in a quickly-digestible way because not everyone reads text carefully.

I'm done with this thread. Have fun.

"because not everyone reads text carefully"

Well, that would be fitting. Because neither do you _write_ your texts carefully. Sometimes you put out several blog-entries a day, cluttered with whatever odd quotes you've found while browsing the web at night. None of them researched in any way, and thus full of really embarrassing mistakes. You simply refuse to do any research. Because you don't want to _know_, you only want to slander.

Best example: You repeatedly insinuated Jeff Waugh and his wife to be corrupt. When Jeff confronted you, you rejected his kind offer to interview him in person, you didn't call him, even though he gave you his phone number - instead you you were all "oh now, that's a big misunderstanding, you read me wrong". But still you went on accusing him and now even the GNOME board of having been bought by Microsoft.

Only when you are confronted you virtually merge with the wall behind you, you utterly vanish. On a similar occasion, when Jeff invited you to publicly ask him questions in a podcast, you didn't dare pose a _single_ critical question when it came to it. Oh, I forgot, your excuse was that "you didn't prepare for the podcast". You never prepare, that's the impression one gets. Preparation is no fun, eh? And the minute you were back on your blog, after the production, you were whining 'oh, they were so many, they were all against me, it was a conspiracy; how could I possibly have asked questions in such a hostile atmosphere'. Oh, come ON!

You really enjoy writing baseless s**t in your blog, dripping with poison and mischief, and the moment it gets to a 'man to man' you soooo chicken out.

Roy, stop the backstabbing. If you're just not man enough to work diligently leave the GNOME community alone, and rather start working on your PhD.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More in Tux Machines

Suitcase Computer Reborn with Raspberry Pi Inside

Fun fact, the Osborne 1 debuted with a price tag equivalent to about $5,000 in today’s value. With a gigantic 9″ screen and twin floppy drives (for making mix tapes, right?) the real miracle of the machine was its portability, something unheard of at the time. The retrocomputing trend is to lovingly and carefully restore these old machines to their former glory, regardless of how clunky or underpowered they are by modern standards. But sometimes they can’t be saved yet it’s still possible to gut and rebuild the machine with modern hardware, like with this Raspberry Pi used to revive an Osborne 1. Purists will turn their nose up at this one, and we admit that this one feels a little like “restoring” radios from the 30s by chucking out the original chassis and throwing in a streaming player. But [koff1979] went to a lot of effort to keep the original Osborne look and feel in the final product. We imagine that with the original guts replaced by a Pi and a small LCD display taking the place of the 80 character by 24 line CRT, the machine is less strain on the shoulder when carrying it around. (We hear the original Osborne 1 was portable in the same way that an anvil is technically portable.) The Pi runs an emulator to get the original CP/M experience; it even runs Wordstar. The tricky part about this build was making the original keyboard talk to the Pi, which was accomplished with an Arduino that translates key presses to USB. Read more

FOSS FUD From EFF and Black Duck

Posts From MiniDebConf Hamburg 2018

  • Debian is wrong
    So, the MiniDebConf Hamburg 2018 is about to end, it's sunny, no clouds are visible and people seem to be happy. And, I have time to write this blog post! So, just as a teaser for now, I'll present to you the content of some slides of our "Reproducible Buster" talk today. Later I will add links to the video and the full slides.
  • Mini DebConf Hamburg
    Since Friday around noon time, I and my 6-year-old son are at the Mini DebConf in Hamburg. Attending together with my son is quite a different experience than plain alone or with also having my wife around. Though he is doing pretty good, it mostly means the day ends for me around 2100 when he needs to go to sleep.

today's howtos