Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Millions of Windows Users Need To Clean Up Their Act.

Filed under

Security is black and white. Either you are secure and protected, or you’re not. Strange as it might seem at first, I don’t blame Microsoft for their demonstrated inability to build a perfectly secure personal computer. After all, it’s not possible. But I do hold Microsoft responsible for continually marketing and selling something they can never produce. And they MUST be held responsible for the consequences of believing their own marketing and press.

Microsoft’s software has NEVER been secure, and NEVER will be. With each generation of feature-rama upgrade, it becomes more and more complex, and less and less understandable. There can not be anyone left at Microsoft whose mind can still grasp the technical details of the entire system. They had to give that up with MS-DOS. Microsoft’s lack of security foresight is single-handedly responsible for creating the eMail virus. Their consumer operating systems — as well as their high-end server platforms — are notoriously insecure.

So why am I saying that millions of Windows Users need to clean up their act? There is one simple reason.

You are “owned”.

Full Article.

So tired of the FUD

Blah Blah Blah, I'm so tired of hearing about how much Windows Sucks. I'm not a MS fanboy (I design for the end result, not by what vendor is the most popular that week), but neither myself, nor my friends, nor my family, nor my kids, nor my clients have ANY trouble running Window systems (desktops or servers) and they're not "owned". Anyone with half a brain can keep their system patched to date (it's called "auto update" people, it's not rocket science), use anti-virus (AVG it's free for home users), use MS Anti-Spyware (it's free for home users) and stick their network behind a firewall (IPCOP or PFSENSE - and yes, they're free). With those safe guards in place, I would truly like to see a windows box "get owned" - it doesn't happen. I'd also like to see some proof for the oh so popular "unprotected windows box on the 'net will be owned in 14 minutes" article. I put a WinXP Pro SP1 box with a public IP on my external network for several days - nothing happened. It's all FUD (and dumbass reporters who can't check the facts before writing a story). I like Linux (and I tried to like OS X but after 1.5 years of trying it just didn't happen) but I'm getting tired of the fanboy's who can only promote them using FUD instead of features. If you can't "sell it" by the facts and features - then maybe it just isn't as good as you think it is. Lets put a little more science into "computer science" and leave the propaganda for governments to use.

I know you're not talking to me

(and dumbass reporters who can't check the facts before writing a story).

You know skippy, I think getting beat up for your lunch money so much as a kid really left some nasty psychological scars on you pal. You were provided a link to a page of reports from one of the leading experts on Windows XP in the world...just put your mouse on the link and click, it's real simple. Oh, is Mr. Gibson a fanboi?

Let's try this:,2000061744,39200021,00.htm

and this:

Or maybe this:

A "protected" Windows machine survives well against most attacks, I have one running at one of my offices, however; consider the senior citizens, kids and carpool moms who just don't realize the danger. Now I do understand that techno-fascists will claim people such as this have no business using a computer.

Go on...Agree with it, I've seen your posts elsewhere, that is exactly how you think. Besides, you lost any credibility when you had to resort to name-calling. A practice I am sure you avoid in face-to face debates.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More in Tux Machines

Linux 4.9.88, 4.4.122, and 3.18.100, More Security Patches in Linux 4.16

Ubuntu MATE 18.04 LTS Will Ship with a New Default Layout Called "Familiar"

Ubuntu MATE's lead developer Martin Wimpress announced that the forthcoming Ubuntu MATE 18.04 LTS (Bionic Beaver) operating system would sport a brand-new default layout for new installations. If you plan on installing or reinstalling Ubuntu MATE this spring, the upcoming 18.04 release sports a new default layout called "Familiar." According to Martin Wimpress, the new layout is based on the Traditional layout with the menu-bar replaced by Brisk Menu, which was used in previous Ubuntu MATE releases. The decision to replace the Traditional layout with the Familiar one was taken due to some technical issues when the development team tried to update it for Ubuntu MATE 18.04 LTS (Bionic Beaver). Traditional will still be available, but not enabled by default, and bears no changes. Read more

Atom 1.25

  • Atom 1.25
    Atom 1.25 has been released on our stable channel and includes GitHub package improvements, improved syntax highlighting and code folding, Python and HTML language improvements and more.
  • GitHub's Atom Hackable Text Editor Gets Performance, Responsiveness Improvements
    GitHub released a new stable version of their open-source and cross-platform Atom hackable text editor with a bunch of enhancements, bug fixes, a new Electron version, as well as performance and responsiveness improvements. Atom 1.25 is now available for GNU/Linux, macOS, and Windows platforms, and it is packed with improvements for the GitHub package to let you stage and view changes affecting file mode modifications, additions to symbolic links, as well as the ability for the Diff view to no longer reset its scrolling position.

Linux Mint 19 'Tara' Cinnamon will be faster

Is Linux Mint slow? Hell, no! The operating system is plenty fast. Speed is in the eye of the beholder, however, and the Mint developers apparently thought app-launching seemed slow when using the Cinnamon desktop environment. They didn't have any proof, but they felt that both Mate and Xfce were faster in this regard. Well, rather than allow their feelings to remain unproven, the Mint devs decided to come up with a speed test to see if they were correct. Guess what? They were! Windows build time was four times slower with Cinnamon compared to Metacity, while recovery time was nearly four times slower too. So yes, app-launching on Cinnamon -- as of today -- is slow comparatively. The big benefit to pinpointing a problem, however, is that it is the first step in solving it. And so, Linux Mint 19 Cinnamon will be faster as a result. Read more