Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Millions of Windows Users Need To Clean Up Their Act.

Filed under
Microsoft

Security is black and white. Either you are secure and protected, or you’re not. Strange as it might seem at first, I don’t blame Microsoft for their demonstrated inability to build a perfectly secure personal computer. After all, it’s not possible. But I do hold Microsoft responsible for continually marketing and selling something they can never produce. And they MUST be held responsible for the consequences of believing their own marketing and press.

Microsoft’s software has NEVER been secure, and NEVER will be. With each generation of feature-rama upgrade, it becomes more and more complex, and less and less understandable. There can not be anyone left at Microsoft whose mind can still grasp the technical details of the entire system. They had to give that up with MS-DOS. Microsoft’s lack of security foresight is single-handedly responsible for creating the eMail virus. Their consumer operating systems — as well as their high-end server platforms — are notoriously insecure.

So why am I saying that millions of Windows Users need to clean up their act? There is one simple reason.

You are “owned”.

Full Article.

So tired of the FUD

Blah Blah Blah, I'm so tired of hearing about how much Windows Sucks. I'm not a MS fanboy (I design for the end result, not by what vendor is the most popular that week), but neither myself, nor my friends, nor my family, nor my kids, nor my clients have ANY trouble running Window systems (desktops or servers) and they're not "owned". Anyone with half a brain can keep their system patched to date (it's called "auto update" people, it's not rocket science), use anti-virus (AVG it's free for home users), use MS Anti-Spyware (it's free for home users) and stick their network behind a firewall (IPCOP or PFSENSE - and yes, they're free). With those safe guards in place, I would truly like to see a windows box "get owned" - it doesn't happen. I'd also like to see some proof for the oh so popular "unprotected windows box on the 'net will be owned in 14 minutes" article. I put a WinXP Pro SP1 box with a public IP on my external network for several days - nothing happened. It's all FUD (and dumbass reporters who can't check the facts before writing a story). I like Linux (and I tried to like OS X but after 1.5 years of trying it just didn't happen) but I'm getting tired of the fanboy's who can only promote them using FUD instead of features. If you can't "sell it" by the facts and features - then maybe it just isn't as good as you think it is. Lets put a little more science into "computer science" and leave the propaganda for governments to use.

I know you're not talking to me

(and dumbass reporters who can't check the facts before writing a story).

You know skippy, I think getting beat up for your lunch money so much as a kid really left some nasty psychological scars on you pal. You were provided a link to a page of reports from one of the leading experts on Windows XP in the world...just put your mouse on the link and click, it's real simple. Oh, is Mr. Gibson a fanboi?

Let's try this: http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/security/0,2000061744,39200021,00.htm

and this:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1291394/posts

Or maybe this:
http://www.biznix.org/articles/malware.html

A "protected" Windows machine survives well against most attacks, I have one running at one of my offices, however; consider the senior citizens, kids and carpool moms who just don't realize the danger. Now I do understand that techno-fascists will claim people such as this have no business using a computer.

Go on...Agree with it, I've seen your posts elsewhere, that is exactly how you think. Besides, you lost any credibility when you had to resort to name-calling. A practice I am sure you avoid in face-to face debates.

helios

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More in Tux Machines

Open Source Router Connects US, Australia

The ONOS Project and partners said Wednesday they have demonstrated the real-world practicality of using a router with open source software to connect networks in Australia and the US. The test validates the vision of SDN, open source for carriers, as well as ON.Lab's ONOS network operating system, according to one of its coordinators. "SDN is about disaggregation of closed, proprietary boxes and separating of forwarding planes, control planes and applications," says Guru Parulkar, executive director and board member of ON.Lab , which coordinates ONOS development. The communications test between Australia and the US achieved just that, he says. (See ON.Lab Aims to Make White Boxes Carrier-Grade , ON.Lab Intros Open Source SDN OS and SK Telecom Bets on SDN for Wireless.) Read more

Xubuntu Core 15.04 Officially Released, Not Related to Ubuntu Core

A new official Xubuntu flavor called "core" has been announced by developers. It's based on Ubuntu, and it integrates the Xfce desktop environment and nothing else. Read more

Ubuntu Developers Working to Use Systemd on Ubuntu Touch

The desktop flavor of Ubuntu has already moved to systemd from an upstart, but Ubuntu Touch is still using upstart. It's not clear when the mobile platform will move to the new init system, but Ubuntu developers are already working towards this goal. Read more

Nginx open source server gets TCP load-balancing

With the release of the Nginx 1.9.0 Web server, Nginx has taken TCP load-balancing capabilities from its commercial Nginx Plus product and fitted it to the company's open source technology. TCP load balancing improves failover consistency among worker processes, according to Nginx. The feature already has appeared in the commercial Nginx 5 and 6 products. Read more