Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Millions of Windows Users Need To Clean Up Their Act.

Filed under
Microsoft

Security is black and white. Either you are secure and protected, or you’re not. Strange as it might seem at first, I don’t blame Microsoft for their demonstrated inability to build a perfectly secure personal computer. After all, it’s not possible. But I do hold Microsoft responsible for continually marketing and selling something they can never produce. And they MUST be held responsible for the consequences of believing their own marketing and press.

Microsoft’s software has NEVER been secure, and NEVER will be. With each generation of feature-rama upgrade, it becomes more and more complex, and less and less understandable. There can not be anyone left at Microsoft whose mind can still grasp the technical details of the entire system. They had to give that up with MS-DOS. Microsoft’s lack of security foresight is single-handedly responsible for creating the eMail virus. Their consumer operating systems — as well as their high-end server platforms — are notoriously insecure.

So why am I saying that millions of Windows Users need to clean up their act? There is one simple reason.

You are “owned”.

Full Article.

So tired of the FUD

Blah Blah Blah, I'm so tired of hearing about how much Windows Sucks. I'm not a MS fanboy (I design for the end result, not by what vendor is the most popular that week), but neither myself, nor my friends, nor my family, nor my kids, nor my clients have ANY trouble running Window systems (desktops or servers) and they're not "owned". Anyone with half a brain can keep their system patched to date (it's called "auto update" people, it's not rocket science), use anti-virus (AVG it's free for home users), use MS Anti-Spyware (it's free for home users) and stick their network behind a firewall (IPCOP or PFSENSE - and yes, they're free). With those safe guards in place, I would truly like to see a windows box "get owned" - it doesn't happen. I'd also like to see some proof for the oh so popular "unprotected windows box on the 'net will be owned in 14 minutes" article. I put a WinXP Pro SP1 box with a public IP on my external network for several days - nothing happened. It's all FUD (and dumbass reporters who can't check the facts before writing a story). I like Linux (and I tried to like OS X but after 1.5 years of trying it just didn't happen) but I'm getting tired of the fanboy's who can only promote them using FUD instead of features. If you can't "sell it" by the facts and features - then maybe it just isn't as good as you think it is. Lets put a little more science into "computer science" and leave the propaganda for governments to use.

I know you're not talking to me

(and dumbass reporters who can't check the facts before writing a story).

You know skippy, I think getting beat up for your lunch money so much as a kid really left some nasty psychological scars on you pal. You were provided a link to a page of reports from one of the leading experts on Windows XP in the world...just put your mouse on the link and click, it's real simple. Oh, is Mr. Gibson a fanboi?

Let's try this: http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/security/0,2000061744,39200021,00.htm

and this:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1291394/posts

Or maybe this:
http://www.biznix.org/articles/malware.html

A "protected" Windows machine survives well against most attacks, I have one running at one of my offices, however; consider the senior citizens, kids and carpool moms who just don't realize the danger. Now I do understand that techno-fascists will claim people such as this have no business using a computer.

Go on...Agree with it, I've seen your posts elsewhere, that is exactly how you think. Besides, you lost any credibility when you had to resort to name-calling. A practice I am sure you avoid in face-to face debates.

helios

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More in Tux Machines

More of today's howtos

GNOME News: Black Lab Drops GNOME and Further GNOME Experiments in Meson

  • Ubuntu-Based Black Lab Enterprise Linux 11.0.1 Drops GNOME 3 for MATE Desktop
    Coming about two weeks after the release of Black Lab Enterprise Linux 11, which is based on the Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS (Xenial Xerus) operating system using the HWE (hardware enablement) kernel from Ubuntu 16.10 (Yakkety Yak), Black Lab Enterprise Linux 11.0.1 appears to be an unexpected maintenance update addressing a few important issues reported by users lately.
  • 3.26 Developments
    My approach to development can often differ from my peers. I prefer to spend the early phase of a cycle doing lots of prototypes of various features we plan to implement. That allows me to have the confidence necessary to know early in the cycle what I can finish and where to ask for help.
  • Further experiments in Meson
    Meson is definitely getting more traction in GNOME (and other projects), with many components adding support for it in parallel to autotools, or outright switching to it. There are still bugs, here and there, and we definitely need to improve build environments — like Continuous — to support Meson out of the box, but all in all I’m really happy about not having to deal with autotools any more, as well as being able to build the G* stack much more quickly when doing continuous integration.

Fedora and Red Hat

Debian and Derivatives

  • Reproducible Builds: week 108 in Stretch cycle
  • Debuerreotype
    The project is named “Debuerreotype” as an homage to the photography roots of the word “snapshot” and the daguerreotype process which was an early method of taking photographs. The essential goal is to create “photographs” of a minimal Debian rootfs, so the name seemed appropriate (even if it’s a bit on the “mouthful” side).
  • The end of Parsix GNU/Linux
    The Debian-based Parsix distribution has announced that it will be shutting down six months after the Debian "Stretch" release.
  • Privacy-focused Debian 9 'Stretch' Linux-based operating system Tails 3.0 reaches RC status
    If you want to keep the government and other people out of your business when surfing the web, Tails is an excellent choice. The Linux-based operating system exists solely for privacy purposes. It is designed to run from read-only media such as a DVD, so that there are limited possibilities of leaving a trail. Of course, even though it isn't ideal, you can run it from a USB flash drive too, as optical drives have largely fallen out of favor with consumers. Today, Tails achieves an important milestone. Version 3.0 reaches RC status -- meaning the first release candidate (RC1). In other words, it may soon be ready for a stable release -- if testing confirms as much. If you want to test it and provide feedback, you can download the ISO now.