Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Daniel Robbins' Offer Rejected by Gentoo Foundation Trustee

Filed under
Gentoo

It appears that there are two interim trustees - Grant Goodyear and Paul de Vrieze.

Paul de Vrieze sent me an email supporting the acceptance of my offer and my return. He communicated all this prior to my deadline.

With Grant, the situation is a bit more confusing.

He did ask me today (again, 1/21/2008 - past deadline) if I would be willing to extend the deadline of my offer for an unspecified period of time and put my offer up to a Gentoo Foundation member (1+ yr developer) vote, in which my offer and other competing offers would be presented to members and one would be selected by vote.

So, at this point I don't have a clear or unified answer from the current Foundation trustees. However, I did place a deadline on my offer for a reason - so my offer couldn't be used to drag me into an extremely long-term and political Gentoo decision-making process against my will. Basically, I wanted an answer - "Yes" or "No." Do you want me back? If so, let me get to work. If not - OK, let me know. I'll do other things. I didn't want to be left hanging.

I am left to interpret Grant's response as a "No."

More Here




More in Tux Machines

Uselessd: A Stripped Down Version Of Systemd

The boycotting of systemd has led to the creation of uselessd, a new init daemon based off systemd that tries to strip out the "unnecessary" features. Uselessd in its early stages of development is systemd reduced to being a basic init daemon process with "the superfluous stuff cut out". Among the items removed are removing of journald, libudev, udevd, and superfluous unit types. Read more

Open source is not dead

I don’t think you can compare Red Hat to other Linux distributions because we are not a distribution company. We have a business model on Enterprise Linux. But I would compare the other distributions to Fedora because it’s a community-driven distribution. The commercially-driven distribution for Red Hat which is Enterprise Linux has paid staff behind it and unlike Microsoft we have a Security Response Team. So for example, even if we have the smallest security issue, we have a guaranteed resolution pattern which nobody else can give because everybody has volunteers, which is fine. I am not saying that the volunteers are not good people, they are often the best people in the industry but they have no hard commitments to fixing certain things within certain timeframes. They will fix it when they can. Most of those people are committed and will immediately get onto it. But as a company that uses open source you have no guarantee about the resolution time. So in terms of this, it is much better using Red Hat in that sense. It’s really what our business model is designed around; to give securities and certainties to the customers who want to use open source. Read more

10 Reasons to use open source software defined networking

Software-defined networking (SDN) is emerging as one of the fastest growing segments of open source software (OSS), which in itself is now firmly entrenched in the enterprise IT world. SDN simplifies IT network configuration and management by decoupling control from the physical network infrastructure. Read more

Only FOSSers ‘Get’ FOSS

Back on the first of September I wrote an article about Android, in which I pointed out that Google’s mobile operating system seems to be primarily designed to help sell things. This eventually led to a discussion thread on a subreddit devoted to Android. Needless to say, the fanbois and fangrrls over on Reddit didn’t cotton to my criticism and they devoted a lot of space complaining about how the article was poorly written. Read more