Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Review: PC-BSD 1.5

Filed under
BSD

PC-BSD, a strong contender for the top desktop distribution out there, has once again grown, going from version 1.3 to 1.5 in just under a year. In that time it's grown, prospered, and had it's fair share of growing pains as well. But version 1.5 is only one subversion up from the previous version 1.4 that we reviewed. So what makes version 1.5 better than its predecessors and worth a look from us? Well, let's have a look.

Installation

Well, one thing I have to give credit to the developers of PC-BSD, the install works just as good as before. Overall the install is pretty painless like before. Very new user friendly in every way, which is good. Sometimes that degrades and becomes complicated or obfuscated over time. This hasn't.

The Main System

One of the biggest reasons I believe that the developers chose for going with a new version of PC-BSD, was that they wanted to take advantage of all the improvements that have come along in the Open Source world in the last six months. Some amazing things have come down the line that would easily justify a new version just to take advantage of those. Especially the improved Xorg libraries, KDE improvements, the QT development platform and more.

But did these new improvements really help?




More in Tux Machines

today's leftovers

Graphics News

More of today's howtos

GNOME News: Black Lab Drops GNOME and Further GNOME Experiments in Meson

  • Ubuntu-Based Black Lab Enterprise Linux 11.0.1 Drops GNOME 3 for MATE Desktop
    Coming about two weeks after the release of Black Lab Enterprise Linux 11, which is based on the Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS (Xenial Xerus) operating system using the HWE (hardware enablement) kernel from Ubuntu 16.10 (Yakkety Yak), Black Lab Enterprise Linux 11.0.1 appears to be an unexpected maintenance update addressing a few important issues reported by users lately.
  • 3.26 Developments
    My approach to development can often differ from my peers. I prefer to spend the early phase of a cycle doing lots of prototypes of various features we plan to implement. That allows me to have the confidence necessary to know early in the cycle what I can finish and where to ask for help.
  • Further experiments in Meson
    Meson is definitely getting more traction in GNOME (and other projects), with many components adding support for it in parallel to autotools, or outright switching to it. There are still bugs, here and there, and we definitely need to improve build environments — like Continuous — to support Meson out of the box, but all in all I’m really happy about not having to deal with autotools any more, as well as being able to build the G* stack much more quickly when doing continuous integration.