Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Drigg (the pligg alternative) vs. Pligg: why should people switch?

Filed under
Software

As some of you already know, I am the main developer for Drigg. I donated probably more than 1000 hours of my life to the Drigg project, because I believed in it. After reviewing existing CMSs out there, I believe that Drigg is the best system available today for people who want to create Digg-like sites (but, in fact, when people deploy Drigg they get fully functional Drupal sites…!). You can see my contributions to Drigg daily. One more programmer has joined Drigg, which is going right ahead.

However, Drigg’s community is still smaller than Pligg, its main competitor. Why?

I am not sure about the answer. If you look at the raw number, if you search for “Drigg” in Google you get 86000 pages; if you search for Pligg, you get nearly 6 million pages. Mind you, Pligg is a very unique name, whereas Drigg’s results are helped by the town of Drigg. A lot of pages pointing to Pligg are people looking for Pligg experts, able to solve quirks and otherwise inexplicable issues. Drigg, on the other hand, is extremely stable and well engineered. Sometimes, I wonder if I should add quirks and random problems just to give users a reason to get together and work on something?

more here




re: Drigg

All those development hours and they (nor their competition) couldn't take a few to come up with a decent name?

Reminds me of the way old SNL skit where a law firm (or some biz suit firm anyways) has a TV commercial and at the end they flash up their new web site address and it's www.clownpenis.fart, with a little tiny legal disclaimer underneath it saying "since all the other domain names were already taken".

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More in Tux Machines

China starts Windows wipe-out, switches to Linux

China is presently in a situation to completely eradicate Windows from the country. Though this is not immediately possible, the map to wipe-out the Windows operating system from every computer is planned over a period of a few years from now. According to a report on SoftPedia, China has planned to move away from Microsoft Windows completely. Recently, China had announced the ban of Windows 8 in the country accusing Microsoft of spying the China government and businesses via the operating system. China has made it mandatory to all organizations to switch from the Microsoft Windows operating system to a locally developed operating system based on Linux. China believes that by the year 2020, they will successfully eradicate Windows and would have an already switched to a more powerful and secure operating system of their own. Read more

Simplicity Linux 14.10 is now available to download!

Simplicity Linux 14.10 is now available for everyone to download. It uses the 3.15.4 kernel. Netbook and Desktop Editions both use LXDE as the desktop environment, and X Edition uses KDE 4.12.3. The download links are as follows: Read more

Free-software pioneer says it's all about liberty

When it comes to code that runs a computer or a program, Richard Stallman believes it should be free. Not only at no cost to the user, but unshackled and independent. To Stallman, it is a matter of liberty, not price. “We say free software as in ‘free speech’ not ‘free beer,’” Stallman said. The computer programmer and activist shared his views, which earned him the MacArthur “Genius Grant,” during a presentation at Weber State University on Thursday. Read more

Samsung fires another shot at Microsoft in Android patent battle

This move came as no surprise to lawyers who've been following the case. One intellectual property (IP) attorney whose firm is covering the case closely said that Samsung is simply adding another argument to their contention that their existing Microsoft Android patent deal is invalid on business contract grounds. According to Reuters, Samsung said it agreed to pay Microsoft Android patent license royalties in 2011, but the deal also stated that Samsung would develop Windows phones and share confidential business information with Microsoft. If Samsung were to sell a certain number of Windows phones, then Microsoft would reduce the Android royalty payments. Read more