Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

When Snort is not enough

Filed under
Software

As an independent security consultant I offered a course to customers called Network Security Operations, which covered network-centric intrusion detection, response and forensics. Students often asked, "Is this the Snort course?" And I answered, "Not exactly, but you're probably in the right place."

I've been inspecting and acting upon network traffic for 10 years. When I tell people that I use network traffic as one means to detect and respond to intrusions, many respond by saying, "So you use Ethereal, right?" I find myself responding in a similar manner to the Snort question: "Not exactly, but sometimes."

Both of these questions point to customer perceptions of common ways to detect and respond to intrusions. The digital security field is incredibly complicated and anyone who claims to be a master of the entire field is a fool. In fact, mastery of any single subject might require such narrow focus as to be of little relevance to the remainder of the field. Those who are most successful have carved some niche out of the security landscape, but still understand the rest of the arena.

More Here




re: Snort

Snort is IDS (not IPS), and generates WAAAAAAAAAAY more false alarms then any real attacks.

The author states: "At the end of the day, you can never have enough data." - I guess that's true when you're a "security consultant" and charge by the hour to wade thru the reams of fluff looking for a line or two indicating a real attack (like SETI only not as exciting - or probable).

Firewalls are like windshields - they both catch a zillon nasties ON THE OUTSIDE. It's only when they come INSIDE do you have to worry.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More in Tux Machines

Microsoft vs GNU/Linux

Netflix and GNU/Linux

today's howtos

KDE/Qt

  • Device Tailored Compositors with Qt Wayland at CLAAS E-Systems
    Have you heard about software in cars that run on embedded devices? Do you think that creating such software might be challenging? Well, welcome to a complete new world of complexity, welcome to the world of agriculture machines! For many years, automatic steering (on fields), terminals to control the complex mechanical operations of a self-driving 16 ton combine harvester on a soft ground, and self-optimization systems to optimize any tiny bit of your harvester, are key demands from customers. I, myself, am working at CLAAS E-Systems, the electronics and software department within the CLAAS group. Our group is well known for being among the leading manufacturers for combine harvesters, tractors and forage harvesters.
  • Qt Wayland Is Next Appearing On Tractors & Farm Equipment
    With Qt 5.8's Qt Wayland Compositor Framework taking shape, more developers are beginning to tailor a Qt Wayland compositor to their use-cases. One of those is a company specializing in farm equipment like combine harvesters, tractors, and harvesters. As a guest post on the official Qt blog, developer Andreas Cord-Landwehr of CLAAS E-Systems talked up Qt Wayland for their purposes in the highly-regulated agriculture industry.
  • KDevelop 5.1 Open-Source IDE Launches with LLDB and OpenCL Support, Many Changes
    The development team behind the popular, open-source, cross-platform, free and powerful KDevelop IDE (Integrated Development Environment) were proud to announce the official release and general availability of KDevelop 5.1. KDevelop 5.1 is now the most advanced stable version of the application, which is written entirely in Qt and designed to be used on various GNU/Linux distributions that usually ship with the KDE Plasma desktop environment, but also on the latest releases of the Microsoft Windows operating system.