Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

A Continuing Look at Windows v. Linux Security

Filed under
Linux

First--here's my current working definition of "security": it's the process of evaluating threats and reducing their effectiveness.

You will never be 100% "secure" because the upper limit is bound by human stupidity. The best you can do is to reduce the threats to just below that level. Sure, you can protect your system against viruses/worms/trojans and so forth, but you will still lose files/data/time/money because people will accidentally delete them. If the amount of data/time/money/etc lost as a result of viruses/worms/trojans is LESS than the amount of data/time/money/etc lost due to human error, then you're doing a good job.

Ideally, you'll lose no data and spend no time/money in recovery, but you will spend time/money on the security process for those systems.

Full Article.

More in Tux Machines

Android Leftovers

More Security Leftovers

Linux Foundation and Free Software Foundation Europe

Lessons learned from the failure of Ubuntu Touch

With the death of yet another open source/free software/Linux-based mobile platform, Ubuntu Touch, clearly it is time for us to sit down and have a frank discussion about what we in the free software world can reasonably accomplish in a mobile platform. One of the biggest issues—if not THE biggest issue—with Ubuntu Touch was that it simply had goals that were far too aggressive to reasonably achieve. It suffered from the all-too-common malady known in software development as feature creep. Read more