Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

A Continuing Look at Windows v. Linux Security

Filed under
Linux

First--here's my current working definition of "security": it's the process of evaluating threats and reducing their effectiveness.

You will never be 100% "secure" because the upper limit is bound by human stupidity. The best you can do is to reduce the threats to just below that level. Sure, you can protect your system against viruses/worms/trojans and so forth, but you will still lose files/data/time/money because people will accidentally delete them. If the amount of data/time/money/etc lost as a result of viruses/worms/trojans is LESS than the amount of data/time/money/etc lost due to human error, then you're doing a good job.

Ideally, you'll lose no data and spend no time/money in recovery, but you will spend time/money on the security process for those systems.

Full Article.

More in Tux Machines

Leftovers: Software

today's howtos

Canonical Makes It a Lot Easier for Newcomers to Discover the Ubuntu Flavours

Canonical's Michael Hall had the great pleasure of announcing that the ubuntu.com website has been redesigned to make it easier for Ubuntu newcomers to discover the flavours of the world's most popular free operating system. Read more

Leftovers: Gaming