Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

My Top 5 Distro Picks

Seems a hot topic for internet journalists in the technology field is "which distro should you try." I read 'em and link to 'em, but I rarely agree with 'em. So, I decided to write my own "which distro should you try" article. As you might know, I download and check out a few from time to time. I'm nothing nearing a Linux expert. However, if it's one thing I do have a lot of experience with, it's installing and checking out Linux distributions. I started testing Linux distros looong before I started my site. I started testing Linux back when there were only a few players in the field. I'm quite fortunate for my site's sake this is no longer the case. In fact, there are so many these days, what's a newbie to do?

If you start throwing out criteria, is this going to mean anything to a newcomer? Do you want a binary-based quick install with excellent package management? Do you want to use a Debian-based, Slackware-based, or rpm-based distro? Do you want to install one or one that can be run from a cd without having to repartition? Poor newbie...

For the sake of newcomers let me try to explain some of the differences, as best as I know them. Binary-based mean basically that it's a distro with packages already built and ready to install and use. This is a nice method if you are in a hurry and want to be up and running in short order. The main disadvantage is these packages are binaries and could theoretically contain anything. I never worried about this actually, trusting if anything malicious was ever included, someone much smarter than me would find it. Truth of the matter is, this bad situation could happen in source-based as well, until someone bothers to look at the code. How many of us actually look through source code before we compile it?

In my separation types in the above scenario, (Deb, slack, rpm based), I was referring mostly to package management? There are many other differences in these types of distros as well such as the init method, configuration methods, reading and location, and sometimes even directory structure and location of packages as well as their philosophies, goals and market.

As far as package management (software installers/uninstallers), these days and times, from a superficial outward appearance, the differences in those have diminished. They all have gui front-ends (or amazingly easy cli method) to install software while checking for and installing dependencies if and when needed. So, does it matter what kind of packages a particular distro uses? To tell you the truth, it doesn't mean beans to me anymore. As long as I can figure out how to use them and install what I want I'm good.

So what is our criteria then? I think a newcomer, or even an old hack, is looking for a nice looking distro that does the work without crashing out and causing data loss. You may look at some and find one just appeals to you more than another. Perhaps one has the applications you're accustomed to, or very similar. Maybe one interacts with your hardware better than another. It could come down to something as simple as eyecandy. Where do we wanna-be-journalists get off telling you which distro to use because when all is said and done, it comes down to pure preference?

Well, we are asked from time to time. And our recommendations usually come down to which distros we "like". Which work for us? Which are stable on our hardware? Which have the applications or desktop environment we like?

So, which distros do I like?

In no real particular order:

  • Wolvix
  • This is a livecd based on slax/slackware that just blew me away. It has no hard drive installer right now and that's the biggest, and probably only, drawback I found with it. It was beautiful, complete and stable. No real configuration needed, it worked wonderfully out of the box. It configures the internet connection and other hardware for you and looks great doing it. It's light weight and can perform excellently on slightly older hardware. The menu is logical and contains an application for most of the basic end-user's needs. I like to think of Wolvix as functionality without complication. I highly recommend Wolvix. See my full review here.



  • PCLOS
  • PCLOS is a binary-based livecd/installable distro based on Mandriva, an rpm-based distro. PCLOS uses rpm as it's package type and has a gui-front end for installation of packages. It is absolutely the most beautiful desktop in existence. If your main goal is the prettiest desktop around, this is the one to use. It's stable and functional. It comes with a lot of extras that newbies and lazy-folk (like me) don't want to set up themselves such as plugins for flash, java, and all sorts of media playing. It also has one of the most intuitive selection of applications in a distro out there, not to mention an ever expanding repository for other software. The head developer is accessible and works 24/7 for his users. This distro has a very active user forum, irc channel and mailing list to help anyone with any questions they have. It has a sexy graphcal hard drive installer and is a wonderful choice. See my full review here.



  • Frugalware
  • Frugalware is another rpm-based binary distro. It derives from Redhat. I admit never being the big Redhat fan, but Frugalware was absolutely wonderful. It was very stable and complete. The install and use of Frugalware was one of the easiest, hassle-free experiences in my Linux tenure. It just worked. See my full review here, although an update or two has been released since that review and I suspect it's even better. Just look at a recent screenshot here.



  • Damn Small Linux
  • Damn Small Linux is a tiny distro with modest hardware requirements that is still very complete and easy to install and use. It features a graphical package manager, although it may not "look" quite like the others, it is still quite easy to figure out and navigate. It comes with an application for about every basic need and it very stable and pretty. I've reviewed this distro a coupla times, although they aren't on the latest and Damn Small is one distro that releases often and releases a much better version each time. This is a wonderful choice. My reviews are here and here.



  • SuSE Linux.
  • SuSE is another binary-based and super-duper easy install. They use rpm for their software packages with a wonderful graphical front-end. I find it stable, complete, and widely supported. A newcomer or an old hack alike can't really go wrong with SuSE Linux. I've done numerous reviews of this following their latest development cycle. This review might give you some idea of what it's like and it links to the other reviews for more information as well.




This turned out to be a much harder article to write than I first anticipated. There are so many nice distributions out there and I have so many favorites, but I had to stick to the subject: Which would be the easiest for a newcomer to install and/or use. Too many of my very favorites are not that user-friendly or still have a few issues. Then there's the issue of many being left out of my repertory of reviews or experience altogether such as Knoppix, Mepis and Ubuntu. And then there's the subjective factor. The ones I'd pick may not be the ones someone else with equal or more experience would pick. In any case there ya are, these are my top 5 picks for an user-friendly experience.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Gentoo

Dont you mean my top 5 distros other than Gentoo? tee hee

re: Gentoo

Weeeellll, gentoo is my workhorse. It's my main os on my desktop and servers, but is it newbie friendly? I can argue that it really is, but it's not a quick graphically based install. If one follows the fine documentation, it's an easy install, but I didn't think too many people would agree. It's easy for me because I've been a cli junkie from the beginning, but for a newcomer straight from windows or someone who's only used one of the Linuxes that doesn't require any cli use... I just didn't think it'd be appropriate for the article.

I think distros like Gentoo and Slackware are really taking "it" to the next level. Although I can argue both are easy, how many newbies would agree? My subject was easy use or install & use with little or no tweaking necessary. All those mentioned in the article I think meet that criteria. Gentoo doesn't.

You installed and set up Gentoo last summer, would you say it would be easy for a newcomer?

----
You talk the talk, but do you waddle the waddle?

re: Gentoo

Ya know, actually, if I hand out cds to friends and family members who run windows to show off Linux's beauty and capabilities, it's PCLOS!

It's really best of both worlds - livecd and installer. They can boot it up and run it and not touch their system - which is a nice feature for a lot of them. Yet, install it for better performance and customizing if desired. I guess if the truth was to be known, this is my number one on my list.

----
You talk the talk, but do you waddle the waddle?

Another Distro Consideration

If you need Linux both as a workstation, and the same distro on another box as a server, you'll be limited in your choices. You have this situation covered with SuSE. Also, a limited number of distros have a kernel for the xbox, PowerPC, X86-64bit, Multiple processors (SMP), and other linux niches. For these circumstances, if you want to use the same basic distro for all these niches, you become limited to Red Hat/SuSE/Mandriva (I don't know about kernel variations for Debian/Slackware). Personally, for me, the choice is Mandriva. But really, any of the three I mentioned would fill the flexibility requirement. It is simpler to administer if all the boxes are running the same basic distro, as I have at the high-school where I teach.

Hrm...

PCLOS wouldn't be my choice...I had it on both a desktop and my laptop, and after about a month of working well, they both suddenly broke, and refused to compile ANY source code and programs would crash consistantly. The interesting thing is that the Desktop was constantly connected to the internet, yet the Laptop never was, and they both broke in the same way at the same time, and they both had completely different hardware, and were never networked to each other or any other computers for that matter.

Oh well, it's probably just me. If that problem doesn't occur for you, then PCLOS is definately a great distro to use. Very complete, stable and user-friendly. =)

Frugalware

srlinuxx wrote:

Frugalware

Frugalware is another rpm-based binary distro. It derives from Redhat. I admit never being the big Redhat fan, but Frugalware was absolutely wonderful.

Frugalware is not rpm-based distro and does not derive from RedHat at all.
It derives from Slackware and it uses the pacman package manager; the extension of Frugalware packages is .fpm (see: http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20060522#interview and http://frugalware.org/about).

re: Frugalware

Hmmm, I seemed to have been aware of that for my full review of it a few months prior. I don't know why I made such a mistake during this blog entry. I must have been relying upon failing memory. I'm so sorry. You sound like you took such offense. But it was a "blonde moment," which I have from time to time. I'm usually so careful. Thanks for clearing that up for any future readers.

re: re: Frugalware

Sorry for the ragged style, I just tried to stay objective. Maybe I used too many bolded words?
Take such offense? Not really, see previous. So sorry also.

More in Tux Machines

A Seat at the Big Kids’ Table at Ohio LinuxFest

Ohio LinuxFest isn’t just another excuse to travel. It’s a means for us to fulfill ourselves, and to get honest, tangible feedback for what we do and for what others are doing. It’s a place where ideas are sounded, bent, crumpled and turned until they either come out of the crucible perfect…or useless. That’s what our gatherings are about. They are about excitement and promise. They​ are about making sure the next generation has a real chance to put the first human footprint on Mars. They are a chance to insure they have the tools and the curiosity to take something apart and then make it better. This next generation will cure diabetes; they will make cancer an inconvenience and not a death sentence. Read more

OpenStack Juno is out, Debian (and Ubuntu Trusty ports) packages ready

This is just a quick announce: Debian packages for Juno are out. In fact, they were ready the day of the release, on the 16th of October. I uploaded it all (to Experimental) the same day, literally a few hours after the final released was git tagged. But I had no time to announce it. This week-end, I took the time to do an Ubuntu Trusty port, which I also publish (it’s just a mater of rebuilding all, and it should work out of the box). Here are the backports repositories. For Wheezy: deb http://archive.gplhost.com/debian juno-backports main deb http://archive.gplhost.com/debian juno main For trusty: deb http://archive.gplhost.com/debian trusty-juno-backports main Read more

Video: Systemd the Core OS (no coughing)

There has been so much negative stuff about systemd on teh Interwebs lately. It is so sad. Quite a few distros picked systemd because they liked a lot of the features it has. Why do the people who like systemd actually like it? Sure, if you look hard enough, you can find those answers... but I remembered a video where the man himself explains it. Read more

GParted 0.20 Improves Btrfs Support

GParted 0.20.0 is out today with a release that primarily improves Btrfs support. The improved Btrfs support comes via now handling support for resizing Btrfs file-systems that span multiple devices. GParted 0.20 also has GRUB2 restoration steps added to the help manual plus various translation updates. Read more