Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Fedora vs. Ubuntu

Filed under

With a short break between the classes, I decided to try to install Ubuntu and Fedora Core 9 on my laptop to compare the two...

On Vista laptop, Ubuntu does not resize windows partition automatically, and I had to use windows native utilities to do that. Other than that, install of Ubuntu went very quickly and ubuntu automajically configured the multi-boot environment (I am sure redhat would have done the same). Redhat initial install also was not very difficult, but took a lot longer ( a lot more staff is "bundled in" by default, so it is not an apple-to-apple comparison).

Hardware Support
I found hardware support in Ubuntu and Fedora to be pretty much identical. Automatic configuration for some key hardware was fine, however, had to twick a little bit setup for sound card (in both distributions), and spent a bit of time trying to get wireless to work.

Trying to get some other, less common, hardware, such as second monitor or touch-screen on my tablet PC was more problematic.

More Here

More in Tux Machines

Supporting Software Freedom Conservancy

There are a number of important organizations in the Open Source and Free Software world that do tremendously valuable work. This includes groups such as the Linux Foundation, Free Software Foundation, Electronic Frontier Foundation, Apache Software Foundation, and others. Read more

Leftovers: OSS

  • Video: PBS Pro Workload Manager Goes Open Source
  • Turris Omnia: high-security, high-performance, open-source router
    An Indigogo campaign was recently launched for the Turis Omnia, promising backers a high-security, high-performance, open-source router. “With powerful hardware, Turris Omnia can handle gigabit traffic and still be able to do much more,” the company said. “You can use it as a home server, NAS, printserver, and it even has a virtual server built-in.”
  • IBM SystemML Machine Learning Technology Goes Open-Source
  • PuppetLabs Introduces Application Orchestration
    Everybody loves Puppet! Or at the very least, an awful lot of people USE Puppet and in the IT world, “love” is often best expressed by the opening of one’s wallet. I know, in the FOSS world wallets are unnecessary, and Puppet does indeed have an Open Source version. However, once one gets to enterprise-level computing, a tool designed for enterprise scale is preferable and usually there is a cost associated. Puppet was originally started as an open source project by Luke Kanies in 2005, essentially out of frustration with the other configuration management products available at the time. Their first commercial product was released in 2011, and today it is the most widely used configuration management tool in the world with about 30,000 companies running it. According to our own surveys, better than 60% of Linux Journal readers use some form of Puppet already and you must like it too as it regularly finishes at or near the top in Readers’ Choice awards.

today's howtos

Ubuntu 16.04 LTS Continues To Focus On The Linux 4.4 Kernel

Ubuntu's kernel team continues to be focused on having Linux 4.4 for Ubuntu 16.04. Linux 4.4 is their target for the "Xenial Xerus" since Ubuntu 16.04 is to be a Long-Term Support release and the upstream 4.4 kernel is also being maintained as a long-term release too. Additionally, Linux 4.5 would come too close to the April debut of Ubuntu 16.04 that the developers wouldn't feel comfortable, particularly for an LTS release. Read more