Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Mandriva Pink Slips Adam Williamson too

Filed under
MDV

Well, I was rather expecting this after reading Vincent’s blog this morning (and to be honest, doing some basic mental arithmetic on our recent financial results), but I have been told that as of December 31st, I’ll no longer be working for Mandriva, as all external contractors are being canned.

I’ve had a great time working for Mandriva, and hopefully whatever job I find next will leave me enough time and flexibility to keep working on the distribution as a volunteer. I’ll try and still be around the user community after my contract expires, too.

More here




Mandriva just made a big mistake - BIG

To quote Pretty Woman. Adam is the best thing they had going for them when it came to the forums. Good sensible advice delivered in a way that people could understand.

Atang, lay off the paint

Atang,

lay off the paint chips. That is all.

Insert_Ending_Here

Atang

Atang1, what are you smoking, man?
No offence, but one day your "posix packets" and "Eclipse SOA cloud computing" stopped being funny and became worrysome. Either you have access to some real weed, either you are a really long-time joker or... maybe you need a girlfriend Big Grin

Best,
virvan

Mistake

Big mistake. Why lay off the talent?

___
/me always wondered if atang was some kind of inexpensive shill

re: Mistake

schestowitz wrote:
Big mistake. Why lay off the talent?

Um.....because they have no money? Mandriva is dreaming if they think their current "business model" can turn a profit. They have to cut expenses before they can beg for another handout.

re: re: Mistake

Yes, they're going to have to pinch a lot of pennies to survive. But canning the human support face who has done much to assist the faithful in installing, configuring, and maintaining Mandriva distros, as Mandriva was beginning to win back a quality reputation, is a dreadful mistake. It's not about the necessity of layoffs, it's about Mandriva's choices of who specifically gets the pink slips.

re: (x3) Mistake

gfranken wrote:
it's about Mandriva's choices of who specifically gets the pink slips.

Of course it is. But if they had "smart" management, they'd be turning a profit and wouldn't need to cut expenses. In any case, it's a short term, bottom line pad, that will most likely be futile and end in doom.

Ditto.

I'm with you on that one. AlanW should stay.

Wrong approach

What Adam could bring was the knowledge and assistance that would keep people using Mandriva rather than another distro. That would keep the revenue flowing. If you know that the people supporting the distro are interested in helping your experience so that you keep using that distro rather than another one, then you will have more people using it and more revenue flowing in. If the people supporting the distro are nasty or smart-alecky or look down their noses at those who have questions, the those who have questions will find somewhere else to put their time and effort and money and that somewhere else will get the benefit of the good support groups. Evidently Mandriva doesn't care that the best people to support the distro were let go.

This attitude will send people like me who were interested in Mandriva to Ubuntu or Slackware or Sabayon were we are appreciated and where there is good support. I currently use two other distros most of the time rather than Mandriva and the main reason is that when I have a question, I get a response that answers my question and gives the logic behind the answer within hours and without any nasty remarks. I appreciate that and support it with my contribution. Mandriva, not so much and now that they have let go the ones who were giving good support there not at all.

Story Problem

You have 100,000 people downloading Mandriva for free. You piss off 90,000 people due to lackadaisical community support. Question: How many private jets does the CEO lose?

Answer: None.

Your assumption is wrong. Mandriva ONLY cares about their PAYING customers - not the freeloaders.

Unlike the Windows user base - where they are used to paying money for software. Linux fanboys via the shrill ranting of Stallman EXPECT everything for free. Not exactly a stellar business model to rake in the big bucks.

Problem is that the "freeloaders" are the ones who will donate

Donations are the way the rest of the Linux distros make their money. People will donate if they get something for it and will not donate if the distro supporters treat them like s*it.

The big bucks come in time to those who earn them and will keep coming there. If you piss off your users, you lose any opportunity to get those big bucks. Bad policy loses customers and losing costumers means others will not see any reason to pay for the product that is losing.

re: Problem...

That's a good story - unfortunately it's not backed up by facts.

Freeloaders will ALWAYS be freeloaders (i.e. NOT customers). Only a very small percentage of people willing donate - and compared to even the most basic of operational costs - it's a teeny tiny drop in the bucket.

Keeping Freeloaders happy is at best a "soft money" return (i.e. goodwill). Unfortunately it's been proven many times over that goodwill is wasted on Freeloaders and NEVER is converted into hard money (i.e. profit).

For references - look at Unoobtu. In theory the most popular distro on the planet, yet it's a black hole money-wise (i.e. money goes in but NEVER comes out) and would have died long ago if it wasn't a hobby (and/or ego tool) for it's wealthy benefactor.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More in Tux Machines

Avidemux 2.6.13 Open-Source Video Editor Gets AAC/ADTS Import and Export

The developers of the Avidemux open-source and cross-platform video editor software have announced a new maintenance update in the 2.6 series, bringing multiple improvements, bug fixes, and a handful of new features. Read more

5 Best Linux Distros for Security

Security is nothing new to Linux distributions. Linux distros have always emphasized security and related matters like firewalls, penetration testing, anonymity, and privacy. So it is hardly surprising that security conscious distributions are common place. For instance, Distrowatch lists sixteen distros that specialize in firewalls, and four for privacy. Most of these specialty security distributions, however, share the same drawback: they are tools for experts, not average users. Only recently have security distributions tried to make security features generally accessible for desktop users. Read more

Linux Foundation and Linux

  • How IoTivity and AllJoyn Could Combine
    At the Embedded Linux Conference in April, Open Connectivity Foundation (OCF) Executive Director Mike Richmond concluded his keynote on the potential for interoperability between the OCF’s IoTivity IoT framework and the AllSeen Alliance’s AllJoyn spec by inviting to the stage Greg Burns, the chief architect of AllJoyn. Burns briefly shared his opinion that not only was there no major technical obstacle to combining these two major open source IoT specs, but that by taking the best of both standards, a hybrid could emerge that improves upon both. Later in the day, Burns gave a technical overview of how such a hybrid could be crafted in “Evolving a Best-of-Breed IoT Framework.” (See video below.) Burns stated in both talks that his opinions in no way reflect the official position of OCF or the AllSeen Alliance. At the time of the ELC talk in April, Burns had recently left his job as VP of Engineering at Qualcomm and Chair of the Technical Steering Committee at the AllSeen Alliance to take on the position of Chief IoT Software Technologist in the Open Source Technology Center at Intel Corp.
  • ​Linus Torvalds' love-hate relationship with the GPL
    Linux's founder appreciates what the GNU General Public License has given Linux, but he doesn't appreciate how some open-source lawyers are trying to enforce it in court.
  • Linus Torvalds reflects on 25 years of Linux
    LinuxCon North America concluded in Toronto, Canada on August 25th, the day Linux was celebrating its 25th anniversary. Linus Torvalds, the creator of Linux, and Dirk Hohndel, VP and chief of open source at VMware, sat down for a conversation at the event and reflected upon the past 25 years. Here are some of the highlights of that conversation.
  • 6 things you should know from Linux's first 25 years
    Red Hat was founded in 1993, two years after Linux was announced and the company has been one of the top contributors to Linux. There is a symbiotic relationship between the company and the project. Whitehurst pointed out that it’s hard to talk about the history of Red Hat without talking about Linux and vice versa.
  • There Is Talk Of Resuming OpenChrome VIA KMS/DRM Driver Development
    Two or so years back or so it was looking hopeful that the mainline Linux kernel would finally have a proper VIA DRM/KMS driver for the unfortunate ones still have VIA x86 hardware and using the integrated graphics. However, that work was ultimately abandoned but there is talk of it being restored.

Security News

  • New FairWare Ransomware targeting Linux Computers [Ed: probably just a side effect of keeping servers unpatched]
    A new attack called FaireWare Ransomware is targeting Linux users where the attackers hack a Linux server, delete the web folder, and then demand a ransom payment of two bitcoins to get their files back. In this attack, the attackers most likely do not encrypt the files, and if they do retain the files, probably just upload it to a server under their control.
  • How do we explain email to an "expert"?
    This has been a pretty wild week, more wild than usual I think we can all agree. The topic I found the most interesting wasn't about one of the countless 0day flaws, it was a story from Slate titled: In Praise of the Private Email Server The TL;DR says running your own email server is a great idea. Almost everyone came out proclaiming it a terrible idea. I agree it's a terrible idea, but this also got me thinking. How do you explain this to someone who doesn't really understand what's going on? There are three primary groups of people. 1) People who know they know nothing 2) People who think they're experts 3) People who are actually experts
  • Why the term “zero day” needs to be in your brand’s cybersecurity vocabulary
    Linux is “open source” which means anyone can look at the code and point out flaws. In that sense, I’d say Linus Torvalds doesn’t have to be as omniscient as Tim Cook. Linux source code isn’t hidden behind closed doors. My understanding is, all the Linux code is out there for anyone to see, naked for anyone to scrutinize, which is why certain countries feel safer using it–there’s no hidden agenda or secret “back door” lurking in the shadows. Does that mean Android phones are safer? That’s up for debate.