Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Open source doesn't make software safer

Filed under
OSS

There is this ludicrous paradigm among the technorati that just because a piece of software is developed collaboratively and by enthusiasts with source code shared freely on the web, that automatically makes it more secure and less buggy.

"When everyone can look at your code," runs the argument, "flaws get found more quickly and patches get released almost immediately."

But although everyone can look at open source code, in practice, the only people who do are those involved in developing the software and those trying to create malware that exploits it.

This is exactly the same situation that applies to closed source software, except that it is somewhat harder for the hackers to get their copy of the code.

More here




Another non article

Where this article fails bigtime is it's disregard for reality.

Windows = millions of malware and viruses
Linux = virtually none, and those holes are quickly patched.

So practical reality show his argument is rubbish. Also the assertion that malware attacks Microsoft because it is an attack on "the man" is also spurious. Most modern virus and malware writers are criminals and in it for the money, they do not care who or what company they target, only results.

It is also handy that Linux is inherently more secure by design and sensible Linux people get their software from a repository, not some dodgy warez site or bittorrent.

GregE
Melbourne, Australia

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More in Tux Machines

Radeon Linux Benchmarks: Catalyst 15.3 Beta vs. Linux 4.0 + Mesa 10.6-devel

Before ending out March, here's some new OpenGL Linux benchmarks comparing the closed-source Catalyst 15.3 Beta driver against the Linux 4.0 development kernel with Mesa 10.6 Git for the freshest open-source graphics driver code. Read more

5 questions to determine if open source is a good fit for a software project

A benefit of open source in general, and commercial open source in particular, is that you have the support of others as well as the ability to do the maintenance yourself. I hope these questions will help you determine whether open source is a good fit for your next software project. Let me know if there are other questions you would add to this list. Read more

Clonezilla Live 2.4.0-7 Released to Fix a Btrfs Issue, Based on Debian Sid

Steven Shiau has released a new development version of his Clonezilla Live operating system aimed at system administrators who want an easy-to-use, portable, and straightforward solution for cloning disk drives. Read more

Lumina Desktop 0.8.3 Released!

The next version of the Lumina Desktop Environment has just been released! This is mainly a bugfix release to correct an urgent issue with the system tray on FreeBSD 11, but there are a number of other slight improvements/updates included as well. The full list of changes is included at the bottom of this announcement, but the notable changes are as follows: New Panel Plugin: “Application Launcher“ This allows the user to pin the shortcut for an application directly to a panel. New Utility: “lumina-xconfig“ This utility allows the user to easily enable/disable additional monitors/screens within the desktop session. Fix the issue with transparent system tray icons on FreeBSD 11 Add support for the XDG autostart specifications. Read more