Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Why all the Mono hate?

Filed under
Software

I keep seeing posts on Identi.ca (and elsewhere) from people looking for alternatives to *really really** good applications like Gnome-do and Banshee just because they are written in C#/Mono. Now, an alternative to Banshee is pretty easy to come by since there are quite a few good alternative media applications. But Gnome-do is a little trickier. You could go with .. I don't know. Maybe Gnome's ALT-F2 'Run Application' dialog? Maybe bashrun? Maybe you could just stick a bunch of stuff in your .bash_aliases? That isn't the point of this post though.

I don't understand why there's such IMMENSE animosity toward Mono. In the most basic sense, it is a Free Software implementation of a proprietary technology. Given this fact, what makes it different (from a legal/ethical/moral perspective) than other well-known projects like Samba, Gnash, WINE, GnuPG, anything that uses libgpod, anything the encodes/decodes an mp3, Liberation Fonts.

rest here




re: Mono Hate

No Kidding.

FSF freaks and their religious FUD about Mono is complete nonsense.

I don't care if the Flying Spaghetti Monsters arch nemesis Lysol himself codes it - if it makes my day to day operations faster/better/easier I'm all for it.

Remember kiddies - software is just a tool, not a religion.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More in Tux Machines

Android Leftovers

Leftovers: OSS

Ubuntu 16.04 Review: What’s New for Desktop Users

Ubuntu is a tricky distribution. As much as I love it on my home server, my desktop is a different ballgame. In my experience, releases between LTS versions have many new technologies that may or may not survive in the next LTS. There were many technologies or features that Canonical thought were ambitious -- HUD, experimenting with menus, online dash search, Ubuntu Software Center, etc. -- but they were abandoned. So, if I were to use Ubuntu on my desktop, I would still choose LTS. Read more

Workflow and efficiency geek talks Drush and Drupal

I started using Drupal because I needed an open source content management system (CMS) to use in several community projects. One of the projects I was involved with was just getting started and had narrowed its CMS selection down to either Drupal or Joomla. At the time I was using a different framework, but I had considered Drupal in the past and knew that I liked it a lot better than Joomla. I convinced them to go with the new Drupal 6 release and converted all of my other projects for consistency. I started working with Drush because I wanted a unified mechanism to work with local and remote sites. My first major contribution to Drush was site aliases and sql-sync in Drush 3. Read more