New Linux study suggests fundamental M$ creditability problems
Another day, another lame attempt by Microsoft to show that Windows is better than Linux.
This time around, Microsoft commissioned a study to show that Windows does a better job of serving e-commerce applications than Linux.
Of course, in the study, they didn't use the same e-commerce or back-engine DBMSs.
OK, right there, without saying another word, anyone who really knows anything about benchmarking knows that the study is fundamentally flawed. You're not comparing apples to apples; you're comparing apples and oranges.
It would be a different story, if you were trying to compare the transaction speed and reliability of e-commerce packages, but that's not the case here. Microsoft was trying to prove that Windows was better than Linux.


Recent comments
31 min 43 sec ago
8 hours 56 min ago
10 hours 10 min ago
11 hours 27 min ago
11 hours 46 min ago
14 hours 12 min ago
14 hours 27 min ago
15 hours 42 min ago