Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Open source VS proprietary support

Filed under
OSS

One of the biggest arguments people try to use against Open source programs is the supposed lack of support. In general I have found that support for open source programs is equal to and ofttimes better than that provided by proprietary companies. I am not targeting the company that everyone loves to hate either. I am talking (writing) in a general sense.

When I have had problems with proprietary programs and tried to get support for those problems, I have found some to be impossible to get support for. Some I have managed to get support for but it takes a long time and some have been very helpful indeed. To the extent that they connected remotely to our systems and fixed the problem. Of course this level of support required the moving around of numbers in bank accounts. Most of the time I manage to at least get an answer of wont fix by looking through their knowledge bases. In all of these cases I have never managed to contact and speak (write) directly with the developers. There has always been a chain of people in between me and the people who actually fix the problems.

The situation is extremely similar with open source software.




More in Tux Machines

Firefox OS media-casting stick strikes Kickstarter gold

The first Firefox OS based media player has arrived on Kickstarter, in the form of a $25 open-spec HDMI stick that supports Chromecast-like content casting. The Matchstick, which has already zoomed past its Kickstarter campaign’s $100,000 funding goal, with 28 days still remaining, was teased back in June by Mozilla developer evangelist Christian Heilmann. The unnamed prototype was billed as an open source HDMI stick that runs Mozilla’s Linux-based Firefox OS and offers casting capabilities. Few details were revealed at the time except that the device used the same DIAL (DIscovery And Launch) media-casting protocol created by Netflix and popularized by Google’s Chromecast. Read more

Open source history, present day, and licensing

Looking at open source softwares particularly, this is a fact that is probably useful to you if you are thinking about business models, many people don't care about it anymore. We talk about FOSS, Free and Open Source Software, but if we really are strict there's a difference between free software and open source software. On the left, I have free software which most typically is GPL software. Software where the license insures freedom. It gives freedoms to you as a user, but it also requires that the freedoms are maintained. On the right-hand side, you have open source software which is open for all, but it also allows you to close it. So here we come back to the famous clause of the GPL license, the reciprocity requirement which says, "If I am open, you need to be open." So software that comes under the GPL license carries with it something that other people call a virus. I call it a blessing because I think it's great if all software becomes open. Read more

Leftovers: Software

Proprietary

today's howtos