Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Computer worm taxes Revenue Dept.

Filed under
Misc

A computer worm that infected Washington state Revenue Department's system caused some businesses to be charged twice for their taxes.

The department has reversed 1,400 faulty transactions, Deputy Director Ralph Osgood said. He said officials don't know where the computer worm originated.

The Washington State Patrol is investigating. "No confidential taxpayer information was compromised, no data was lost and there was no loss of funds," Osgood said.

The worm entered the Revenue Department's computer system Monday and infected all 13 offices statewide.

It shut down the network, which affected the department's billing system.

The system failed to flag accounts of businesses that paid their taxes over the Internet and charged the businesses for their taxes a second time.

Osgood said all the mistaken charges have been accounted for and the money has been returned to the affected businesses. "It wasn't their fault. So far, the businesses have been very understanding," Osgood said.

Monday was the monthly due date for certain business taxes. As the agency's 1,060 employees turned on their computers, the worm spread rapidly.

The entire computer system was shut down Monday and Tuesday and was starting to come back on line yesterday afternoon.

The FBI's Northwest cybercrimes task force is investigating.

Source.

More in Tux Machines

Mir 0.8 Works On Less ABI Breakage, Touchspots, Responsiveness

While Ubuntu 14.10 on the desktop isn't using Mir by default, Mir 0.8.0 is being prepared for release by Canonical and it has a number of interesting changes. Read more

Open source history, present day, and licensing

Looking at open source softwares particularly, this is a fact that is probably useful to you if you are thinking about business models, many people don't care about it anymore. We talk about FOSS, Free and Open Source Software, but if we really are strict there's a difference between free software and open source software. On the left, I have free software which most typically is GPL software. Software where the license insures freedom. It gives freedoms to you as a user, but it also requires that the freedoms are maintained. On the right-hand side, you have open source software which is open for all, but it also allows you to close it. So here we come back to the famous clause of the GPL license, the reciprocity requirement which says, "If I am open, you need to be open." So software that comes under the GPL license carries with it something that other people call a virus. I call it a blessing because I think it's great if all software becomes open. Read more

Mozilla Wants to Save the Open Web, but is it Too Late?

Again, I think this is absolutely correct. But what it fails to recognise is that one of the key ways of making the Web medium "less free and open" is the use of legally-protected DRM. DRM is the very antithesis of openness and of sharing. And yet, sadly, as I reported back in May, Mozilla has decided to back adding DRM to the Web, starting first with video (but it won't end there...) This means Mozilla's Firefox is itself is a vector of attack against openness and sharing, and undermines its own lofty goals in the Open Web Fellows programme. Read more

Open source is starting to make a dent in proprietary software fortunes

Open source has promised to unseat proprietary competitors for decades, but the cloud may make the threat real. Read more