Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Multiseat X Under X11R6.9/7.0

Filed under
HowTos

I keep getting inquiries about multiseat X configuration under X11R6.9. Here is a temporary mini-Howto document that I've put together. I'll write a better one when X11R6.9/7.0 is finalized (and time permits Smile) ... and there will be a chapter on the topic in one of my upcoming books.

In the meantime, have fun! -- please let me know what experiences you have trying this out (positive or negative) -- in particular, it would be great to have reports on which video card combinations work or do not work.

(For those new the term "Multiseat X", it means creating a system with mulitple video monitors, keyboards, and mice for simultaneous use by multiple users -- like my home system).

Quick Guide/Mini-HOWTO on Creating a Multiseat X System using X.Org 6.9.

More in Tux Machines

Mentor Embedded Linux ready to roll on AMD SoCs

Mentor Graphics has begun shipping Mentor Embedded Linux for AMD’s new Steppe Eagle, Crowned Eagle, and Bald Eagle G-Series and R-Series SoCs. Read more

Today in Techrights

Uselessd: A Stripped Down Version Of Systemd

The boycotting of systemd has led to the creation of uselessd, a new init daemon based off systemd that tries to strip out the "unnecessary" features. Uselessd in its early stages of development is systemd reduced to being a basic init daemon process with "the superfluous stuff cut out". Among the items removed are removing of journald, libudev, udevd, and superfluous unit types. Read more

Open source is not dead

I don’t think you can compare Red Hat to other Linux distributions because we are not a distribution company. We have a business model on Enterprise Linux. But I would compare the other distributions to Fedora because it’s a community-driven distribution. The commercially-driven distribution for Red Hat which is Enterprise Linux has paid staff behind it and unlike Microsoft we have a Security Response Team. So for example, even if we have the smallest security issue, we have a guaranteed resolution pattern which nobody else can give because everybody has volunteers, which is fine. I am not saying that the volunteers are not good people, they are often the best people in the industry but they have no hard commitments to fixing certain things within certain timeframes. They will fix it when they can. Most of those people are committed and will immediately get onto it. But as a company that uses open source you have no guarantee about the resolution time. So in terms of this, it is much better using Red Hat in that sense. It’s really what our business model is designed around; to give securities and certainties to the customers who want to use open source. Read more