Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Fedora 12: A little *too* convenient.

Filed under
Linux

Fedora, and Redhat before it, has held a special place in my heart for years, being that Redhat Desktop was the very first Linux distribution I ever used, and the one I kept coming back to during my programming classes in college.

We've been estranged in recent years since I was seduced by the Debian-like crowd, and a spotty release record hasn't helped me regain my confidence. In fact, so unimpressed was I with release 10 that I completely ignored release 11 (a fact that I just now noticed).

Hopefully this version will make a more memorable impression. I downloaded the GNOME live CD for my initial run-through.

Install:

The dueling scrollbars from previous releases are still here. The actual installer window looks about the same as its ancestors as well. I don't mind sticking with something that works, but I'm a little surprised. Fedora generally likes to give everything a fresh facelift with each release.

Rest Here

Also: Fedora 12 rolls out impressive features




Nothing new?

ThechieMoe is ThechieMoe and has strong opinions based on a quite narrow list of demands. I would however expect him to make better research than this:

"Generally the Fedora crew tend to surge forward with new and interesting things with little regard to little details like stability, but aside from the "anyone can install anything" feature I didn't see much of interest in this release."

Fedora isn't LinuxMint or something like that, so if he doesn't care to learn about quite amazing advancements in virtualization, then he probably shouldn't rant about it. I don't use Fedora but I'm still amazed at how some reviews seem to totally get off target.

re: nothing new?

The problem is that reviewers are people and they are interested in what they're interested in. It's a bit different for folks who get paid to write reviews, but it's still there.

For example, I just finished a little blurb on fedora and didn't mention virtualization once. I was rather taken by all the X stuff myself. But I did end it with something like "this is just a handful of the new features..."

virtualization is like cloud computing to me: in one ear and out the other. just not something I'm interested in. I rarely mention it in any review/article/blog/comment/postcard/smokesignal...

He's every right to publish

He's every right to publish whatever he likes. I've been defending him in the past, and that when he really trashed the distro of my choice. I defended and will defend him because it's his right to not like something.

In this case I'm not attacking him either, even though it looks that way. My reason for disputing his claim was because I think it's fair to do so. Virtualization was just one example of why some would find that there are many new features in Fedora this time as well. That said it's of course more interesting to read something that takes into account the purpose of use for a distro.

Sure everyone writes from his/hers own perspective... and that includes me.

Techiemoe just want's to play games.

Techiemoe just want's to play games.

re: Techiemoe just want's to play games

well, I been there! Big Grin

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More in Tux Machines

Android Leftovers

Arduino-Compatible RISC-V and More

  • HiFive1 Is an Open-Source, Arduino-Compatible RISC-V Dev Kit
    Bay Area startup SiFive has announced the Freedom Everywhere 310 (FE310) system-on-chip — the industry’s first commercially-available SoC based on the free, open-source RISC-V architecture, along with the corresponding low-cost, Arduino-compatible HiFive1 development kit.
  • Samsung Defection From ARM to RISC-V.
    It was always thought that, when ARM relinquished its independence, its customers would look around for other alternatives. The nice thing about RISC-V is that it’s independent, open source and royalty-free. And RISC-V is what Samsung is reported to be using for an IoT CPU in preference to ARM.
  • Neutralize ME firmware on SandyBridge and IvyBridge platforms
    First introduced in Intel’s 965 Express Chipset Family, the Intel Management Engine (ME) is a separate computing environment physically located in the (G)MCH chip (for Core 2 family CPUs which is separate from the northbridge), or PCH chip replacing ICH(for Core i3/i5/i7 which is integrated with northbridge).

Moving From Microsoft to GNU/Linux

  • Is Linux the Right Choice for My Business?
    In these hard-economic times, cutting expense is among the keys to the success of a business. Licensing costs can be a huge drain on the wallet of any service. Of course, Microsoft Windows servers are still the standard in a lot of offices, however, there is an unsung hero out there simply waiting to be discovered by more business-owners. This article is obviously describing Linux. While it does have some appeal in both the general public and economic sectors, it is widely used for servers and still not a really popular operating system for workstations but among geeks. Why? You might ask. Microsoft has the marketplace cornered and remains the norm simply by being the standard. This is not to state that Microsoft does not produce quality software application; this post indicates absolutely nothing of the sort. Microsoft got where they are today by their sweat and devoted developers, in no way is this article lessening the quality of Microsoft or their line of products.
  • Moving with SQL Server to Linux? Move from SQL Server to MySQL as well! [Ed: SQL Server DOES NOT (!) run on Linux]
    Over the recent years, there has been a large number of individuals as well as organizations who are ditching the Windows platform for Linux platform, and this number will continue to grow as more developments in Linux are experienced. Linux has for long been the leader in Web servers as most of the web servers run on Linux, and this could be one of the reasons why the high migration is being experienced.
  • Does Linux community trust Microsoft?
    Does actually Linux community like Microsoft? Does actually Linux community trust Microsoft? I cannot answer the first question for sure, but I have a sure answer for the second question.

Mozilla Reports 2015 Revenue of $421.3M

For its fiscal 2015 year, Mozilla reported revenue of $421.3 million, up from $329.6 million that it reported Mozilla's revenue's have grown significantly over the last decade. The first year that Mozilla ever publicly disclosed its financial status was for its 2005 fiscal year, when the open-source organization generated $52.9 million in revenue. Read more Finance/ial issues: Open source wearable Angel shuts down