NoSQL: Not Going Anywhere For a While?

Everyone seems to have their own problems with the NoSQL term, so here’s mine: it doesn’t mean anything. Not that terms have to be specific to be useful: is the term database really that descriptive?
But the challenge with NoSQL is that the name implies that it means something, and that’s enough for folks new to the space to form opinions on the matter. For better, maybe, but mostly for worse.
The reason NoSQL exists is simple: the long time assumption that if persistence is the question, a relational database is the answer. As far back as March 2005, I’ve been skeptical of the sustainability of that assumption and expecting increased acceptance of non-relational datastores. The predicted adoption took a wee bit longer than I anticipated, but it’s here now. This outcome was inevitable.
Not because relational databases are inherently flawed and poised to go the way of the dinosaur: they’re going to be around as long as I’m in this business.
-
- Login or register to post comments
Printer-friendly version
- 976 reads
PDF version
More in Tux Machines
- Highlights
- Front Page
- Latest Headlines
- Archive
- Recent comments
- All-Time Popular Stories
- Hot Topics
- New Members
today's howtos
| Open Hardware: XON/XOFF and Raspberry Pi Pico
|
Security Leftovers
| How to Apply Accent Colour in Ubuntu Desktop
A step-by-step tutorial on how to apply accent colour in Ubuntu desktop (GNOME) with tips for Kubuntu and others.
|
Recent comments
1 day 12 hours ago
1 day 16 hours ago
1 day 16 hours ago
2 days 23 hours ago
3 days 6 min ago
3 days 1 hour ago
3 days 1 hour ago
3 days 1 hour ago
3 days 4 hours ago
3 days 6 hours ago