Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Which distro offers the best experience?

Filed under
Linux

There are hundreds of Linux distributions available worldwide, kitted with an infinite number of kernel/desktop/applications combos, each offering a unique perspective and usage model.

Still, true to the Pareto principle, most of the Linux desktop belongs to a very small number of distributions, including mainly Ubuntu and its derivatives, Fedora, openSUSE, Mandriva, and a few more. Hop over to DistroWatch and see for yourself. So the big question is, what makes these distros so popular, or better yet, preferred over other candidates? Ultimately, which one offers the most complete all-round experience of all?

In this article, I've taken five most popular distributions and tested them one against another across a range of categories, trying to pinpoint the one that suits me best. You will note this is an entirely subjective experiment, completely subjugated to my own taste and need. Nevertheless, I hope my test will still be impartial enough for you to consider it when choosing your distribution.

Let us begin.




A decent, honest review that lacks the details

I'll accept the conclusions he has. Although I prefer Mandriva over OpenSuse, I do feel as if his conclusions are pretty close, and so are his yardsticks. However, I wish he would have gone more in-depth in his individual measurements for each distro and discussed the pros and cons. I guess you have to read the individual distro reviews for that? I'm glad something was, at least, balanced and not drooling all over Mark Shuttleworth's lap.

re: decent honest review

Yeah, Igor is always fair and unbiased. But it should be noted that the Mandriva he's referring to is Mandriva One. Mandriva Free doesn't come with the extra goodies for 3D graphics or streaming multimedia support. Just wanted to mention that for those wishing to test it.

However, Mandriva offers no samba support out of the box. It's kinda a pain every time I review it having to install samba support to get the screenshots to my desktop with the least physical effort. Big Grin But it might be moot since Mandriva didn't win that category anyway.

I don't understand why he thinks Mandriva offers the most unfriendly installer. I always feel (and state) the opposite. In fact, I think openSUSE might have the most unfriendly for the new user.

Also, in the performance category, he strayed off from Ubuntu to Kubuntu - which creates an anomaly. Kubuntu comes with their version of KDE 4 which is known to drag ass. I was curious how Ubuntu might have stacked up in that test.

I had some issues with Mint 8 networking, so I'm interested in his upcoming review of that.

You have some good points. I

You have some good points. I don't have a need for Samba, so I never had to set it up in Mandriva. Some people have criticized the Mandriva installer because of the confusion when partitioning. Also, I believe the One version comes up with the message that it's removing unnecessary drivers, which throws some people.

Ubuntu has a very simple installer, but, it also never gave me the option of not installing their bootloader, wiping my Mandriva bootloader in the process. The automation that Ubuntu seeks also limits user choice.

My biggest problem with OpenSuse is the myriad of repos. They really don't need to sub categorize so much, using separate repos for every little option. Can't they just use a handful of genuinely different repos for the sake of muti-threading the download process, yet just have the rest in the sections of those repos? Why make it such a pain to add so many repos to the package manager? Newbies just have to be completely befuddled with the setup.

I also like how he included my favorite distro of all time, PCLinuxOS, in there, but honestly, it should have been in the main review. It stacks up very well against the others. Also, Arch is a major contender, as well. The review just lacked completeness. I know you can't include every distro, but those two are kind of serious omissions if you ask me. I didn't mind that Sabayon and Debian were left out because they're not really a distro an average user would go for. They're more for specialized users. However, Fedora is also in the same category as they are because it's so unfriendly to setup and use for the average user, as well.

re: good points

Quote:

Some people have criticized the Mandriva installer because of the confusion when partitioning.

omg, that's one of thing I give it points for - how easy the partitioning step (seems) to be. perhaps I've lost touch with the new new users. hmmm. ...akin to why I can't seem to come up with ideas for howtos or why I made a lousy a teacher.

Quote:

Ubuntu has a very simple installer, but, it also never gave me the option of not installing their bootloader, wiping my Mandriva bootloader in the process. The automation that Ubuntu seeks also limits user choice.

If you hit the advanced button at that step, I know it has an option where you can set it up to just install on the root partition of the install - that way your main bootloader will remain intact. It may have the option in there to not install at all, but I don't recall right off-hand.

Quote:

My biggest problem with OpenSuse is the myriad of repos.

Yeah, I agree there.

Quote:

I also like how he included my favorite distro of all time, PCLinuxOS

I think the reason that distro is falling off lists and users' radar is that development has slowed down - or rather the release of new versions. I understand the repos continue to be updated regularly, but it's hard to recommend downloading the installable CD then tell users to download so many updates, that sometimes can have glitches. I heard rumors PCLOS 2010 is on the horizon, but we'll have to wait and see how that all shakes out. They've lost their momentum, and that's a hard thing to recover.

re: grub 2

Quote:

Ubuntu's grub2 leads people astray

you got that right. ...them and, by extension, all their derivatives.

some even say they moved to grub2 an attempt to lock out users' other (multi-boot) distros. Even if that wasn't the intension, it was surely a selfish move on their part - not caring. Funny, they'll hang on to some technology until grows wrinkles while updating to others before it's ready and cause so many issues.

There's a bunch of tutorials out there.

I find my own experience similar

I personally find opensuse to be the best of the bunch overall, in terms of desktop.

a close second on desktop, for me, is Debian. Once it is setup the way you want, it's a done deal and there is little in the way of having to re-configure after updates.

mandriva is my third choice for me, but likely a second choice for others who may be intimidated by debian.

re: own experience

I like debian on my server, but I've been using mandriva on my desktop for 3 or 4 months.

Debian requires too much work for me to get it up to pretty and carefree-desktop status. It's just not very complete or pretty out of the box. But for "no gui" purposes, it's one of the best for me.

I stopped using gentoo a while ago. It's binary-only for me from now on. I'm too old and tired these days for source code. Big Grin

I think Mandriva 2010 was the best release of 2009, but like Igor said, they have a history of QA issues and inconsistency. One release may be killer, but the next could be riddled with issues. Mepis tends to be more reliable across releases.

openSUSE is usually like mepis in that regard - always rock stable - until 11.2. I had issues with 11.2. I think that was an anomaly tho because every other release worked well and, I seem to have been the only one - not many other reviews reported obvious slap-you-in-the-face issues.

It's so hard for me to pick a favorite. They all good points and bad points. Mepis seems to have less bad than the others to me. I'm anxiously awaiting the new Mepis 8.5 although I've been tickled as punch with Mandriva.

The best overall experience:

The best overall experience: Arch and Slackware

The best out-of-box experience: PCLinuxOS and Pardus

re: slack!

warm and fuzzies for slack for sure!

yeah, Pardus shows well, but Arch = too much work. Tongue

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More in Tux Machines

Security: OpenSSL, IoT, and LWN Coverage of 'Intelpocalypse'

  • Another Face to Face: Email Changes and Crypto Policy
    The OpenSSL OMC met last month for a two-day face-to-face meeting in London, and like previous F2F meetings, most of the team was present and we addressed a great many issues. This blog posts talks about some of them, and most of the others will get their own blog posts, or notices, later. Red Hat graciously hosted us for the two days, and both Red Hat and Cryptsoft covered the costs of their employees who attended. One of the overall threads of the meeting was about increasing the transparency of the project. By default, everything should be done in public. We decided to try some major changes to email and such.
  • Some Basic Rules for Securing Your IoT Stuff

    Throughout 2016 and 2017, attacks from massive botnets made up entirely of hacked [sic] IoT devices had many experts warning of a dire outlook for Internet security. But the future of IoT doesn’t have to be so bleak. Here’s a primer on minimizing the chances that your IoT things become a security liability for you or for the Internet at large.

  • A look at the handling of Meltdown and Spectre
    The Meltdown/Spectre debacle has, deservedly, reached the mainstream press and, likely, most of the public that has even a remote interest in computers and security. It only took a day or so from the accelerated disclosure date of January 3—it was originally scheduled for January 9—before the bugs were making big headlines. But Spectre has been known for at least six months and Meltdown for nearly as long—at least to some in the industry. Others that were affected were completely blindsided by the announcements and have joined the scramble to mitigate these hardware bugs before they bite users. Whatever else can be said about Meltdown and Spectre, the handling (or, in truth, mishandling) of this whole incident has been a horrific failure. For those just tuning in, Meltdown and Spectre are two types of hardware bugs that affect most modern CPUs. They allow attackers to cause the CPU to do speculative execution of code, while timing memory accesses to deduce what has or has not been cached, to disclose the contents of memory. These disclosures can span various security boundaries such as between user space and the kernel or between guest operating systems running in virtual machines. For more information, see the LWN article on the flaws and the blog post by Raspberry Pi founder Eben Upton that well describes modern CPU architectures and speculative execution to explain why the Raspberry Pi is not affected.
  • Addressing Meltdown and Spectre in the kernel
    When the Meltdown and Spectre vulnerabilities were disclosed on January 3, attention quickly turned to mitigations. There was already a clear defense against Meltdown in the form of kernel page-table isolation (KPTI), but the defenses against the two Spectre variants had not been developed in public and still do not exist in the mainline kernel. Initial versions of proposed defenses have now been disclosed. The resulting picture shows what has been done to fend off Spectre-based attacks in the near future, but the situation remains chaotic, to put it lightly. First, a couple of notes with regard to Meltdown. KPTI has been merged for the 4.15 release, followed by a steady trickle of fixes that is undoubtedly not yet finished. The X86_BUG_CPU_INSECURE processor bit is being renamed to X86_BUG_CPU_MELTDOWN now that the details are public; there will be bug flags for the other two variants added in the near future. 4.9.75 and 4.4.110 have been released with their own KPTI variants. The older kernels do not have mainline KPTI, though; instead, they have a backport of the older KAISER patches that more closely matches what distributors shipped. Those backports have not fully stabilized yet either. KPTI patches for ARM are circulating, but have not yet been merged.
  • Is it time for open processors?
    The disclosure of the Meltdown and Spectre vulnerabilities has brought a new level of attention to the security bugs that can lurk at the hardware level. Massive amounts of work have gone into improving the (still poor) security of our software, but all of that is in vain if the hardware gives away the game. The CPUs that we run in our systems are highly proprietary and have been shown to contain unpleasant surprises (the Intel management engine, for example). It is thus natural to wonder whether it is time to make a move to open-source hardware, much like we have done with our software. Such a move may well be possible, and it would certainly offer some benefits, but it would be no panacea. Given the complexity of modern CPUs and the fierceness of the market in which they are sold, it might be surprising to think that they could be developed in an open manner. But there are serious initiatives working in this area; the idea of an open CPU design is not pure fantasy. A quick look around turns up several efforts; the following list is necessarily incomplete.
  • Notes from the Intelpocalypse
    Rumors of an undisclosed CPU security issue have been circulating since before LWN first covered the kernel page-table isolation patch set in November 2017. Now, finally, the information is out — and the problem is even worse than had been expected. Read on for a summary of these issues and what has to be done to respond to them in the kernel. All three disclosed vulnerabilities take advantage of the CPU's speculative execution mechanism. In a simple view, a CPU is a deterministic machine executing a set of instructions in sequence in a predictable manner. Real-world CPUs are more complex, and that complexity has opened the door to some unpleasant attacks. A CPU is typically working on the execution of multiple instructions at once, for performance reasons. Executing instructions in parallel allows the processor to keep more of its subunits busy at once, which speeds things up. But parallel execution is also driven by the slowness of access to main memory. A cache miss requiring a fetch from RAM can stall the execution of an instruction for hundreds of processor cycles, with a clear impact on performance. To minimize the amount of time it spends waiting for data, the CPU will, to the extent it can, execute instructions after the stalled one, essentially reordering the code in the program. That reordering is often invisible, but it occasionally leads to the sort of fun that caused Documentation/memory-barriers.txt to be written.

US Sanctions Against Chinese Android Phones, LWN Report on Eelo

  • A new bill would ban the US government from using Huawei and ZTE phones
    US lawmakers have long worried about the security risks posed the alleged ties between Chinese companies Huawei and ZTE and the country’s government. To that end, Texas Representative Mike Conaway introduced a bill last week called Defending U.S. Government Communications Act, which aims to ban US government agencies from using phones and equipment from the companies. Conaway’s bill would prohibit the US government from purchasing and using “telecommunications equipment and/or services,” from Huawei and ZTE. In a statement on his site, he says that technology coming from the country poses a threat to national security, and that use of this equipment “would be inviting Chinese surveillance into all aspects of our lives,” and cites US Intelligence and counterintelligence officials who say that Huawei has shared information with state leaders, and that the its business in the US is growing, representing a further security risk.
  • U.S. lawmakers urge AT&T to cut commercial ties with Huawei - sources
    U.S. lawmakers are urging AT&T Inc, the No. 2 wireless carrier, to cut commercial ties to Chinese phone maker Huawei Technologies Co Ltd and oppose plans by telecom operator China Mobile Ltd to enter the U.S. market because of national security concerns, two congressional aides said. The warning comes after the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump took a harder line on policies initiated by his predecessor Barack Obama on issues ranging from Beijing’s role in restraining North Korea to Chinese efforts to acquire U.S. strategic industries. Earlier this month, AT&T was forced to scrap a plan to offer its customers Huawei [HWT.UL] handsets after some members of Congress lobbied against the idea with federal regulators, sources told Reuters.
  • Eelo seeks to make a privacy-focused phone
    A focus on privacy is a key feature being touted by a number of different projects these days—from KDE to Tails to Nextcloud. One of the biggest privacy leaks for most people is their phone, so it is no surprise that there are projects looking to address that as well. A new entrant in that category is eelo, which is a non-profit project aimed at producing not only a phone, but also a suite of web services. All of that could potentially replace the Google or Apple mothership, which tend to collect as much personal data as possible.

today's howtos

Mozilla: Resource Hogs, Privacy Month, Firefox Census, These Weeks in Firefox

  • Firefox Quantum Eats RAM Like Chrome
    For a long time, Mozilla’s Firefox has been my web browser of choice. I have always preferred it to using Google’s Chrome, because of its simplicity and reasonable system resource (especially RAM) usage. On many Linux distributions such as Ubuntu, Linux Mint and many others, Firefox even comes installed by default. Recently, Mozilla released a new, powerful and faster version of Firefox called Quantum. And according to the developers, it’s new with a “powerful engine that’s built for rapid-fire performance, better, faster page loading that uses less computer memory.”
  • Mozilla Communities Speaker Series #PrivacyMonth
    As a part of the Privacy Month initiative, Mozilla volunteers are hosting a couple of speaker series webinars on Privacy, Security and related topics. The webinars will see renowned speakers talking to us about their work around privacy, how to take control of your digital self, some privacy-security tips and much more.
  • “Ewoks or Porgs?” and Other Important Questions
    You ever go to a party where you decide to ask people REAL questions about themselves, rather than just boring chit chat? Us, too! That’s why we’ve included questions that really hone in on the important stuff in our 2nd Annual Firefox Census.
  • These Weeks in Firefox: Issue 30