Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Arch Linux smokes all others. My Review.

Filed under
Linux

Last week I finally decided to try another Linux distribution. Even though I started off with Slackware on floppy disks I eventually got really lazy and started to use Ubuntu Linux. I remember those days when I was helping out with the KDE project on the first KDE Beta release. What I remember is my system being fast and also being just how I liked it. Recently I tried running KDE under both Ubuntu and Kubuntu and noticed how slow it ran. It was ver sluggish, even on my Core 2 Duo with 2gigs of ram.

Needless to say I have switch to a more traditional Linux, this time Arch Linux. Arch Linux gives you the old-school feel but lets you be a little bit lazy at the same time. Using the console program pacman you can easy download and install applications for your system. The cool thing is, the application binaries you get are compiled as if you compiled them from source, and they are compiled for Pentium class (i686) and above! With noob distributions such as Ubuntu, Fedora or even Debian, you really never know what you are getting as the software comes with everything pre-installed. They also load a ton of additional crap during boot and for your GUI! Arch compiles from the authors source code, not from a modified version, giving you the real deal.

Well today I decided to really test out Arch Linux and give KDE (my GUI roots) a try again.




-Sigh-

I can't get past the author's incessant name-calling in the article. I hope they do come across my post and maybe address their attitude toward calling certain distributions "noob distros". It doesn't even have to do with the fact that I use one of them (Debian) but that it gives the article a feel of amateurism and elitism. It's unnnecessary.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More in Tux Machines

FLOSSophobia

I have seen it many times. "Linux is a cancer". "Open sauce". "Linuxtard". I even remember the teacher who did not bring a laptop for her presentation and, when I offered her my Linux netbook, she rejected it as if I had presented her something illegal. She tried to use an old Windows computer instead but, when the computer failed, she ended up displaying her presentation with my Linux netbook. Clearly, this teacher's position was not based on ignorance or lack of expertise because she knew Linux existed and all she had to do was to display slides. Her refusal was due to indoctrination: she had learned that Linux and non-Microsoft office suites had to be rejected. Read more

Today in Techrights

Hands on With elementary OS Powered Centurion Nano Laptop by Alpha Store

If you want to buy a new laptop, no doubt you should consider the Centurion line. It will be a good choice for you, Linux aficionado. As well as for your Windows-addicted husband/wife/employees. The Centurion Nano is certainly not a “gamer” laptop. However, besides that particular use case, and for an interesting price, you will get a very competent computer, 100% compatible with Linux and usable for a broad range of tasks. Read more

Tryton and Python Deprecation Warnings

  • Trying Tryton
    The quest to find a free-software replacement for the QuickBooks accounting tool continues. In this episode, your editor does his best to put Tryton through its paces. Running Tryton proved to be a trying experience, though; this would not appear to be the accounting tool we are searching for. Tryton is a Python 3 application distributed under the GPLv3 license. Its home page mentions that it is based on PostgreSQL, but there is support for MySQL and SQLite as well. Tryton, it is said, is "a three-tier high-level general purpose application platform" that is "the core base of a complete business solution providing modularity, scalability and security". The "core base" part of that claim is relevant: Tryton may well be a solid base for the creation of a small-business accounting system, but it is not, out of the box, such a system itself.
  • Who should see Python deprecation warnings?
    As all Python developers discover sooner or later, Python is a rapidly evolving language whose community occasionally makes changes that can break existing programs. The switch to Python 3 is the most prominent example, but minor releases can include significant changes as well. The CPython interpreter can emit warnings for upcoming incompatible changes, giving developers time to prepare their code, but those warnings are suppressed and invisible by default. Work is afoot to make them visible, but doing so is not as straightforward as it might seem. In early November, one sub-thread of a big discussion on preparing for the Python 3.7 release focused on the await and async identifiers. They will become keywords in 3.7, meaning that any code using those names for any other purpose will break. Nick Coghlan observed that Python 3.6 does not warn about the use of those names, calling it "a fairly major oversight/bug". In truth, though, Python 3.6 does emit warnings in that case — but users rarely see them.