Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

What Is Unity Linux?

Filed under
Linux

There’s been a lot of confusion about exactly what Unity Linux is.

I thought I’d talk today a bit about that. I’d like to talk a bit about what Unity uses for it’s ‘guts’. I’d also like to dispel some myths surrounding Unity. Lastly, I’d like to talk briefly about how Unity is doing all it can to further Open Source and Linux by contributing to projects it is involved with. The reason I know so much about this topic is that I’m the webmaster and host for the Unity Linux Project as well as one of the documentation team members. So, let’s take a look first at what Unity Linux is…

What is Unity Linux

Unity Linux is not a conventional distribution of Linux.




mklivecd

In October 2003 Jaco Greef, myself and Buchan Milne were there original people who worked on mklivecd. Jaco also wrote the first installer specifically for PCLinuxOS. Jaco abandoned the mklivecd project in 2003 turning it over to Tom Kelly a PCLinuxOS developer. When Tom left to become priest, Ivan Kerekes a PCLinuxOS developer took over coding for the the project. When Ivan left to spend more time with his family, etjr a PCLinuxOS developer took over coding for the project. All of these people actually provided code to mklivecd. The code was maintained in the PCLinuxOS repositories. I really don't care as I just forked our version to mylivecd and continued development for our distribution.

re: truth

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXoNE14U_zM

Need to know the score?

vonskippy wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXoNE14U_zM

LOL!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqJp21WkEVc

The Truth about Unity-Linux

spiral-of-nope.livejournal.com: A recent blog post by Unity-Linux Devnet attempted to clarify some myths about Unity Linux. Here are the facts.

1. Unity-Linux tried to steal developers and associates from other distributions.

This is true. When a few people left PCLinuxOS to start Unity-Linux they launched a massive email campaign to lure people away. Many who initially joined Unity-Linux have since departed when they realized the people behind the project were apparently less than honest. Only 3-4 people appear to be packaging for Unity-Linux and most have moved on to other projects. Even the once interesting TinyMe has failed to gather much of a following.

2. Unity-Linux stole the mklivecd project.

How do you steal something that's OpenSourced?

I still don't understand how you steal something that's OpenSourced. I worked on MkLiveCD a lot with Ivan, mklivecd is the communities and it's fine that there are multiple versions. Unity's version supports multiple architectures and uses a different hardware detection theme (based off of Mandriva's). PCLinuxOS can use it if they like, like anything else opensource the source is public.

http://dev.unity-linux.org/projects/unitylinux/repository/show/projects/mklivecd

srlinuxx I'm sad to see such a biased opinion. Especially to say someone stole something opensource.. That somehow just rubs me the wrong way. Just like the link you posted about is only viewable to those who have an account. This mind set seems not open at all.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More in Tux Machines

Linux Foundation: New Members, Certifications and Microsoft Entryism

ETSI/GNU/Linux-based MANO

  • ETSI Open Source MANO announces Release FOUR, moving faster than ever
    ETSI is pleased to announce the availability of OSM Release FOUR. Bringing a large set of new features and enhancements, this version is the most ambitious and innovative OSM Release to date and constitutes a huge leap forward in terms of functionality, user experience and maturity. This new Release brings substantial progress thanks to a number of architectural improvements, which result in a more efficient behaviour and much leaner footprint – up to 75% less RAM consumption. Additionally, its new northbound interface, aligned with ETSI NFV work, and the brand-new cloud-native setup, facilitate OSM’s installation and operation, while making OSM more open and simpler to integrate with pluggable modules and external systems, such as the existing OSS.
  • Open Source MANO Release FOUR lands
    In monitoring, ETSI says OSM Release FOUR's alarm and metric settings are easier to use, and a new policy manager adds push notifications and reactive policy configuration, which the standards body says “opens the door to closed-loop operations”. The monitoring module uses Apache Kafka as its message passing bus, and the module also implements a flexible plugin model so sysadmins can BYO monitoring environment.

today's howtos part 2

Programming: GitLab, Security, Power and Jakarta EE

  • GitLab 10.8 open sources push mirroring
    GitLab 10.8 was released this week with the open sourcing of a highly requested feature. The company announced its push mirroring capability is now open sourced. Push mirroring was originally introduced as a paid feature, but GitLab says it is one of the most frequently requested to be moved into the open-source codebase. This move will add a few new use cases for GitLab Core users, such as freelance developers being able to mirror client repos and users migrating to GitLab being able to use push mirroring to ease the migration path.
  • How Security Can Bridge the Chasm with Development
    Enhancing the relationships between security and engineering is crucial for improving software security. These six steps will bring your teams together. There's always been a troublesome rift between enterprise security teams and software developers. While the friction is understandable, it's also a shame, because the chasm between these teams makes it all the more challenging to build quality applications that are both great to use and safe.
  • Which Programming Languages Use the Least Electricity?
    Can energy usage data tell us anything about the quality of our programming languages? Last year a team of six researchers in Portugal from three different universities decided to investigate this question, ultimately releasing a paper titled “Energy Efficiency Across Programming Languages.” They ran the solutions to 10 programming problems written in 27 different languages, while carefully monitoring how much electricity each one used — as well as its speed and memory usage.
  • How Java EE found new life as Jakarta EE
    The title of this post may seem strange, but if you look a bit into Java EE's recent history, it will make sense. Originally, Sun started and ran Java Enterprise Edition, and later Oracle took over after it acquired Sun. Specifications were driven by a Sun/Oracle-governed process. At more or less regular intervals, they made a new version of the specification available, which was implemented by the server vendors. Those vendors had to license the technology compatibility kits (TCKs) and brand from Oracle. Let's fast-forward a bit. In 2013, Java EE 7 was released, and Oracle began work on EE8, but it did not progress quickly. Meanwhile, new technologies like Docker and Kubernetes came along and changed the way applications run. Instead of running a single fat server process on a big machine, the software is now split into smaller, independent services that run in a (usually) Docker container orchestrated by Kubernetes.