Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Fedora 14 Theme Preview

Filed under
Linux

At last week’s design team meeting, we made a decision about the direction of the overall theme for Fedora 14′s artwork, which will affect – among other things – the default wallpaper.

We decided on Kyle Baker’s submission, a Blender-created mockup depicting many lines coming together to form a solid figure, to serve as the basis of the visual concept of Fedora 14.

more here




Yaa for Fedora

I just love they went to their community and asked for participation in the creation of the look for their next release. This is so unlike those dictators at Ubuntu who pushed a design on their members above their objections.

Go team Fedora!

Ubuntu dictators

Dictators my backside. You are not forced to use Ubuntu, you are not even forced to use it as they provide it, they give you the source code you know. You are also not forced to use their theme, just install the Fedora theme if you like it more, it's (polished) Gnome you know, not some hidden source Win32 sorcery.

Ubuntu = Fedora as far as ethics is concerned, as a matter of fact. Providing you bother to check your facts of course.

and truly

no one is forced to use either of those decidedly dictatorial distros.

It's one thing to present a distro as they can best package it and make things work, it's another to try to manipulate and control the way people use the OS as both of these distros attempt.

better to use a distro that gives you a polished total package yet leaves all the final decisions and open options to the user, not those trying to determine your Linux experience for you.

Yet another reason why having multiple Linux distros available is a good thing.

Big Bear

Re: and truly

bigbearomaha wrote:
no one is forced to use either of those decidedly dictatorial distros.

It's one thing to present a distro as they can best package it and make things work, it's another to try to manipulate and control the way people use the OS as both of these distros attempt.

better to use a distro that gives you a polished total package yet leaves all the final decisions and open options to the user, not those trying to determine your Linux experience for you.

Yet another reason why having multiple Linux distros available is a good thing.

Big Bear

Exactly, that's the point. There is no dictatorship in sight, in the big picture. So Mark can do whatever he wants within his distro, he can also make it "dictatorial". He is not harming anything with that, as long as it stays GPL ant it's Linux, meaning it can be swapped over with any other distribution with no incompatibility risks.

Ubuntu = Future Miscrosoft

I'll be forced to use Ubunutu when they run everyone else out of business with their predatory practices. By then they will be just like Microsoft with a mindless following. Fedora you are our only hope!

Play Nice

Look, if you dog's can't share the table scraps, I'll have to put you outside at dinner time.

You guys are arguing over the bottom feeders 3-5% of the desktop market (aka "linux").

Who cares which flavor of this 6 month release cycle is top dog?

Wait a few weeks, and a whole new batch of bugs, problems, incompatibilities will be released as the next coolest thing.

Then you can all start a whole new round of fanboy chants of "my distro sucks less then your distro", and compare the all so important color schemes and desktop themes.

I'm with Redhat on this one, Linux on the Desktop will NEVER happen. There's not a business/enterprise in the world that will put up with re-installing a desktop OS every 6 months.

NOT. GONNA. HAPPEN.

Trolling rolling

vonskippy wrote:
Look, if you dog's can't share the table scraps, I'll have to put you outside at dinner time.

You guys are arguing over the bottom feeders 3-5% of the desktop market (aka "linux").

Who cares which flavor of this 6 month release cycle is top dog?

Wait a few weeks, and a whole new batch of bugs, problems, incompatibilities will be released as the next coolest thing.

Then you can all start a whole new round of fanboy chants of "my distro sucks less then your distro", and compare the all so important color schemes and desktop themes.

I'm with Redhat on this one, Linux on the Desktop will NEVER happen. There's not a business/enterprise in the world that will put up with re-installing a desktop OS every 6 months.

NOT. GONNA. HAPPEN.

Dang! You taking all the fun out of my troll posts!

Playing Nice, and Happening Now!

We don't care if Linux is 1% or 15% or 95% of the desktop world!
We use it, and don't have to use Windows or OSX.

And you also miss the Linux point, one doesn't have to re-install every 6 months. There are even Ubuntu releases with a three year cycle, and other Linux distros with rolling releases, which update/upgrade without reinstalling.
And we get updates; not once a month and on more than just the OS; whenever the correction is offered.

We have choices, NOW...that is the point!

He just pot stirring

Linux is already on the desktop. the ones in my home and in the small businesses and schools I admin/consult for. will it reach the widespread numbers illicitly gained by MS? not a chance.

The damage has been done and even though MS may not use the same agreements and contracts with OEM's that got them to such a large installed base, they are already there by those tactics.

I doubt ANY OS to ever come out will ever see those numbers because of the MS lesson.

You know as well as I do there are already distros where re-installing every 6 months doesn't happen and isn't necessary.

Debian, buntu, Opensuse and others handle that very well now.

As long as the Linux and open source community sees fit to keep rolling out the apps and the effort, I will keep using it as my primary OS every chance I get.

Same goes for those I admin and consult for. Every time Linux shows itself to be an appropriate fit for their needs, it will be used.

Big Bear

Re: Ubuntu = Future Microsoft

poodles wrote:
I'll be forced to use Ubunutu when they run everyone else out of business with their predatory practices.

Impossible to happen, it's open source. Then if you want to troll for the heck of it that's fine with me.

The only thing left will be

The only thing left will be Ubuntu and the hobby distros after they kill off Mandriva and Suse. Fedora you are our only hope!

Natural selection for you

That will be the result of natural selection, not some bribed-pre-install, crafted-incompatibility conspiracy.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More in Tux Machines

Games and CrossOver

Red Hat and Fedora

Android Leftovers

Leftovers: OSS and Sharing

  • CoreOS Tectonic Now Installs Kubernetes on OpenStack
    CoreOS and OpenStack have a somewhat intertwined history, which is why it's somewhat surprising it took until today for CoreOS's Tectonic Kubernetes distribution to provide an installer that targets OpenStack cloud deployments.
  • Docker and Core OS plan to donate their container technologies to CNCF
    Containers have become a critical component of modern cloud, and Docker Inc. controls the heart of containers, the container runtime. There has been a growing demand that this critical piece of technology should be under control of a neutral, third party so that the community can invest in it freely.
  • How Blockchain Is Helping China Go Greener
    Blockchain has near-universal applicability as a distributed transaction platform for securely authenticating exchanges of data, goods, and services. IBM and the Beijing-based Energy-Blockchain Labs are even using it to help reduce carbon emissions in air-polluted China.
  • An efficient approach to continuous documentation
  • The peril in counting source lines on an OSS project
    There seems to be a phase that OSS projects go through where as they mature and gain traction. As they do it becomes increasingly important for vendors to point to their contributions to credibly say they are the ‘xyz’ company. Heptio is one such vendor operating in the OSS space, and this isn’t lost on us. :) It helps during a sales cycle to be able to say “we are the a big contributor to this project, look at the percentage of code and PRs we submitted”. While transparency is important as is recognizing the contributions that key vendors, focus on a single metric in isolation (and LoC in particular) creates a perverse incentive structure. Taken to its extreme it becomes detrimental to project health.
  • An Open Source Unicycle Motor
    And something to ponder. The company that sells this electric unicycle could choose to use a motor with open firmware or one with closed firmware. To many consumers, that difference might not be so significant. To this consumer, though, that’s a vital difference. To me, I fully own the product I bought when the firmware is open. I explain to others that they ought to choose that level of full ownership whenever they get a chance. And if they join a local makerspace, they will likely meet others with similar values. If you don’t yet have a makerspace in your community, inquire around to see if anyone is in the process of forming one. Then find ways to offer them support. That’s how we do things in the FOSS community.
  • The A/V guy’s take on PyCon Pune
    “This is crazy!”, that was my reaction at some point in PyCon Pune. This is one of my first conference where I participated in a lot of things starting from the website to audio/video and of course being the speaker. I saw a lot of aspects of how a conference works and where what can go wrong. I met some amazing people, people who impacted my life , people who I will never forget. I received so much of love and affection that I can never express in words. So before writing anything else I want to thank each and everyone of you , “Thank you!”.
  • Azure Service Fabric takes first tentative steps toward open source [Ed: Microsoft Peter is openwashing a patent trap with back doors]
  • Simulate the Internet with Flashback, a New WebDev Test Tool from LinkedIn
  • Mashape Raises $18M for API Gateway Tech
    Casado sees Mashape's Kong API gateway in particular as being a particularly well positioned technology. Kong is an open-source API gateway and microservice management technology.
  • PrismTech to Demonstrate Open Source FACE 2.1 Transport Services Segment (TSS) Reference Implementation at Air Force FACE Technical Interchange Meeting
    PrismTech’s TSS reference implementation is being made available under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) v3 open source license terms.
  • How Open-Source Robotics Hardware Is Accelerating Research and Innovation

    The latest issue of the IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine features a special report on open-source robotics hardware and its impact in the field.