Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

PC Linux OS : Radically Simple

Filed under
PCLOS

My first experience with a Linux system was back in the year 2006 with Opensuse 10.0. It was the very first Linux based operating system that u have used. Over the last few years have used many Linux distros, many be due to the fact that I like to test and take a look at what other distributions offer when they make a new release. In this manner I have used Ubuntu, Linux Mint, Fedora, Mandriva & Knoppix but I have never used PC Linux Os. From the above distributions that I have tried, I mostly install them and test them. When I do test them I have a feeling that there is something missing. So after trying out there releases I always tend to come back and settle down to Mandriva. It has been my distribution of choice for the last 1 year. However very recently a friend of mine told me that PC Linux Os is a very good distribution and that I should try it. He also told me that it has very good hardware support, not that I have encountered any hardware errors in the past with any Linux distribution that i’ve tried, I downloaded and installed PC Linux OS on my laptop, which is an Acer Travelmate 6292 which has an Intel Core 2 Duo 2.0 GHz Processor and 2GB of RAM. After a couple days using PCLinuxOS 2010.1 I must say that it ranks number one in my list of favourite Linux distributions.

FEATURES

The PCLinuxOS 2010.1 list of FEATURES is very impressive. Nothing surprising there, all feature lists are when any new release comes out. That’s probably why testing a release after reading such lists may result in a bit of a letdown, for the end result usually never matches the expectation. This time around it was pretty much the opposite, which is very significant considering I tested Ubuntu 10.04 just days ago.

rest here




More in Tux Machines

Outsourcing your webapp maintenance to Debian

It turns out that I'm not the only one who thought about this approach, which has been named "debops". The same day that my talk was announced on the DebConf website, someone emailed me saying that he had instituted the exact same rules at his company, which operates a large Django-based web application in the US and Russia. It was pretty impressive to read about a real business coming to the same conclusions and using the same approach (i.e. system libraries, deployment packages) as Libravatar. Regardless of this though, I think there is a class of applications that are particularly well-suited for the approach we've just described. If a web application is not your full-time job and you want to minimize the amount of work required to keep it running, then it's a good investment to restrict your options and leverage the work of the Debian community to simplify your maintenance burden. The second criterion I would look at is framework maturity. Given the 2-3 year release cycle of stable distributions, this approach is more likely to work with a mature framework like Django. After all, you probably wouldn't compile Apache from source, but until recently building Node.js from source was the preferred option as it was changing so quickly. While it goes against conventional wisdom, relying on system libraries is a sustainable approach you should at least consider in your next project. After all, there is a real cost in bundling and keeping up with external dependencies. Read more

How Intel HD Graphics On Linux Compare To Open-Source AMD/NVIDIA Drivers With Steam On Linux

As earlier this week I did a 20-way AMD Radeon open-source comparison, looked at the most energy efficient Radeon GPUs for Linux gaming, and then yesterday provided a look at the fastest NVIDIA GPUs for open-source gaming with Nouveau, in this article is a culmination of all the open-source graphics tests this week while seeing how Intel Haswell HD Graphics fall into the mix against the open-source Radeon R600/RadeonSI and Nouveau NV50/NVC0 graphics drivers. Read more

Leftovers: Gaming

today's howtos