Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

How IBM misjudged the PC revolution

Filed under
Misc

Computer giant IBM has been through many changes. Thirty years ago, the US company dominated the information technology market. Now the landscape is very different, with competitors such as Hewlett-Packard and Dell taking it on on equal terms.

But things could have been very different for the company often referred to as 'Big Blue'. The company cut its teeth on mainframes and servers, but it might have ruled the personal computer market too - had it not been for certain decisions made more than 20 years ago.

At the beginning of the 1980s, IBM was a leading developer of the PC. Other companies had explored the idea of producing a computer which would sit on every worker's desk - Apple, for one, produced a desktop computer in 1977 - but the name IBM gave the product mainstream credibility.

But IBM failed to realise the new product's significance, says David Bradley, one of the team of 12 who produced the PC at IBM. "At the time, we didn't think it was going to be a revolutionary change," he says. "We knew we were working on an exciting project and we certainly hoped it was going to be successful, but we never imagined it was going to take over the world the way it did."

IBM needed an operating system to run its new PC. The company approached Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, then a 19-year-old college dropout. e provided IBM with the PC operating system it required, but crucially the company allowed Mr Gates to hold on to the property rights of the system - a mistake, at least from IBM's point of view, not lost on Mr Gates.

"It was only as [the operating system] grew in volume and power that then IBM recognised that having us control such a key aspect might be a mistake for them." Still, in 1985 IBM was the most profitable company in the world, making profits of almost $6.6bn.

In 1993, IBM stunned the world by reporting quarterly losses of $8bn, caused by increased competition and a changing market. IBM was failing to compete with the new breed of innovative software companies and hardware producers who could make computers much more cheaply. Prices for mainframe computers dropped, eventually they dropped by 90%," says Mr Heller. "This was an immense blow to IBM.

It was time for IBM to break with tradition, and for the first time an outsider, Louis Gerstner, was brought in to head up the company. Tens of thousands of jobs were cut worldwide and the company moved into business services.

The seminal moment in this shift away from its roots came in December last year with the announcement of the $1.75bn sale of IBM's once revolutionary PC business to the Chinese company Lenovo.

Under the terms of the deal, IBM will gain valuable access to huge Chinese markets for its services. But the company will be exiting a market it pioneered, and which many critics believe is better left now to low cost manufacturers.

Full Story.

More in Tux Machines

Chakra GNU/Linux Users Get KDE Plasma 5.7.2, Qt 5.7 and KDE Applications 16.04.3

Chakra GNU/Linux developer Neofytos Kolokotronis today, July 25, 2016, announced the release of the latest KDE and Qt technologies, along with new software versions in the main repositories of the Linux kernel-based operating system. Read more

In a Quiet Market for PCs, Chromebooks are Marching Steadily Forward

It's no secret that Chrome OS has not been the same striking success for Google that the Android OS has been. And yet, Chromebooks--portable computers running the platform--have not only found their niche, but they are also introducing a new generation to cloud computing. Chromebooks are firmly entrenched in the education market, where many young users have become used to the convention of storing apps and data in the cloud. Now, according to new research from Gartner, Chromebooks are ready to hit new milestones. Analysts there report that Chromebook shipment growth will be in the double digits this year. At the same time, though, Chromebooks have not become fixtures in the enterprise, replacing Windows PCs. Read more

Server Administration

  • SysAdmins With Open Source Skills Are In Demand
    System administrators play a crucial role in businesses today. They are the individuals responsible for the configuration, support and maintenance of company computer systems and servers. For this reason, they are a popular hiring request, with defense and media companies alike looking for these professionals on Dice. Yet, despite the ongoing demand, finding and recruiting system administrators may be more of a challenge. Data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) found that the quarterly unemployment rate for system administrators was 0.6%, well below the national quarterly average (4.9%) and the quarterly average for all tech professionals (2.1%). Employers thus need to focus more of their recruitment strategies on poaching this talent from competitors.
  • One Phrase Sysadmins Hate to Hear (And How to Avoid It)
    A few years later, sysarmy, the local IT community, was born as the "Support for those who give support." And in that spirit, for this 8th AdminFest edition, we want to do exactly that: support those who help others in our Q&A platform, sysarmy.com/help. Each 500 points a participant earns, he/she gets a free drink in return!
  • DevOps'n the Operating System
    John Willis takes a brief look at the history of how Devops principles and operating systems have converged. He spends most of the time forward looking at what and how unikernels will converge with Devops tools, processes and culture. He ends with a demo of how containers, unikernels and Devops ideas can work together in the future.
  • 5 reasons system administrators should use revision control
    Whether you're still using Subversion (SVN), or have moved to a distributed system like Git, revision control has found its place in modern operations infrastructures. If you listen to talks at conferences and see what new companies are doing, it can be easy to assume that everyone is now using revision control, and using it effectively. Unfortunately that's not the case. I routinely interact with organizations who either don't track changes in their infrastructure at all, or are not doing so in an effective manner. If you're looking for a way to convince your boss to spend the time to set it up, or are simply looking for some tips to improve how use it, the following are five tips for using revision control in operations.

Kernel Space/Linux