Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

PCLOS 64-Bit Suffers Delays, but Still Coming

Filed under
PCLOS

A long anticipated 64-bit version of PCLOS was reported to be in development this past November. And as 2010 draws to a close, some wonder what is its current status. Bill Reynolds, not known for long winded conversations or laying out rigid development schedules, has given a bit of an update.

Progress is being made on the new architecture to be released by the PCLinuxOS team, although the holidays and seasonal vacations have cut into development time this December. The PCLinuxOS development team is very small even when compared to some other smaller distributions, and when one or more goes on vacation, it can have an impact. But when the team leader needs time off progress tends to slow down dramatically.

rest here




PCDebOS

I heard they are switching to Debian base and ported the Mandriva's Control Center (drakxtools) to it and just waiting for the Debian release to go gold.

It's quite a task

it is quite a task to do...especially without a build server. When I left the dev team of PCLinuxOS, they didn't have an automated build server.

Having a 64bit OS requires more than just having a repository with 64bit packages...it requires your entire packaging staff to build 64bit packages along side 32bit ones...hence the need for a build server because not all packagers will have 64bit platforms.

Freezing a repository so you can make a 64bit snapshot is difficult...and not freezing it and slowly bring packages up to speed is even harder.

They have their work cut out for them. As someone who has seen 32bit go to 64bit with a project...I wish them luck! PCLOS has been trying to get a 64bit distribution since about a year before I started mypclinuxos.com so I hope they can do it. It'd be great to have both 32 and 64 bit versions imho.

Not that hard.

PCLinuxOS has two build servers. One for 32-bit and one for 64-bit. The 32-bit server has been around for a long time. The 64-bit server just came online. The 64-bit project for PCLinuxOS started 6 weeks ago. Prior to that it was just a bunch of nilly willy talk and no effort was actually put into TRYING to build a 64-bit edition.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More in Tux Machines

Canonical Joins The Document Foundation's LibreOffice Project Advisory Board

Today, July 26, 2016, Canonical and The Document Foundation (TDF) announced that the company behind the popular Ubuntu operating system had joined the LibreOffice project Advisory Board. If you're using the Ubuntu Linux OS on your personal computer, you are aware of the fact that the award-winning LibreOffice office suite is installed by default. Canonical chose to use LibreOffice as the default office suite for its widely-used GNU/Linux operating system since the first release of the open-source software in early 2011. Now that Canonical announced the availability of Snaps as universal binary packages for Ubuntu and other supported GNU/Linux distributions, many application developers decided to offer their software in the Snap package format, and it looks like The Document Foundation is among the first to adopt the latest Snappy technologies for LibreOffice. Read more

Linux Filesystems Explained — EXT2/3/4, XFS, Btrfs, ZFS

The first time I installed Ubuntu on my computer, when I was sixteen, I was astonished by the number of filesystems that were available for the system installation. There were so many that I was left overwhelmed and confused. I was worried that if I picked the wrong one my system might run too slow or that it might be more problematic than another. I wanted to know which was the best. Since then, things have changed quite a bit. Many Linux distributions offer a ‘standard’ filesystem that an installation will default to unless otherwise specified. I think this was a very good move because it assists newcomers in making a decision and being comfortable with it. But, for those that are still unsure of some of the contemporary offerings, we’ll be going through them today. Read more

Today in Techrights