Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Response to “Why systemd?”

Filed under
Software

So I read Lennart’s blog post entitled Why systemd?. In it, he makes a number of comparisons between systemd and the two other Linux init systems that are still in widespread use (this being the third init system some distributions have adopted within the last few years). Overall, he makes a good argument that systemd has many nice and exciting features, and I’m sure they are of interest to various people who want their init system to be SYSV on steroids.

These are all things I don’t want built into my init system. To me, there are many good reasons that they have been traditionally handled using simple, easy to edit and modify scripts, and that’s where I personally feel they should belong. In my mind, some don’t even make sense to build directly into the init system itself, such as automounting and the like (that belongs in autofs and friends).

There’s more




More in Tux Machines

Red Hat CEO issues call to arms for open source participation

Broadening the strength and depth of the open source community has always been a goal that has been supported by vendors and businesses alike, but a call to arms for a greater participation was the message that Red Hat wanted to get across at its annual summit. The Red Hat Summit in San Francisco was an opportunity for CEO Jim Whitehurst to talk about the ideology of open source during his keynote presentation, and a message of changing hierarchies underpinned much of what he said. Read more

Avoiding bad practices in open source project management

This whole list has been inspired by many years of open source hacking and free software contributions. Everyone's experiences and feelings might be different, or malpractice may have been seen under different forms. Let me know if there are any other points that you encountered that blocked you from contributing to open source projects! Read more

Today in Techrights

Red Hat Summit Videos