Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

SUSE 10.1 Beta 5 Report

Filed under
Reviews
SUSE
-s

Why? That one thought kept echoing through my thoughts as I installed and ran SUSE 10.1 Beta 5. Around the net several articles entitled something to the effect of "SUSE releases two betas within 4 days" as if it was an accomplishment of 10.0 proportions! Some progress was made, but it reminded me of the old saying "2 steps forward and 3 steps back."

If you look at the "Most Annoying Bugs" report and compare it to Beta4's, you'll find that not only was very little fixed, but they even introduced more bugs. As you can see, I've highlighted the left overs in blue and the new breakage in red.

  • The CD 1 needs to remain in the cd drive after installing from it. Do not remove it during the reboot and wait for YaST to request CD 2.. Otherwise the installation of packages from CD 2-5 will fail afterwards.
  • Due to the integration of the new package manager which is not complete, note the following:
    • Some statistics do not work, e.g. you see "Size of packages to install: 0" - or "Number of packages to install: 0", or "Software: Default system (0)".
    • The graphical package manager frontend has only a limited list of "views", currently you get a list of all the packages and can only search in them.
    • After installation, if you go into the YaST packager, all installed packages are listed twice.
    • Adding a new installation source does not work.
    • Language dependend packages are not handled correctly. This results in the installation of one package-$lang package but not necessarily the one for the languages asked for.
    • An upgrade from a previous installation might fail, even one from 10.1 Beta3 Bug 153142
  • During an update from a previous release, packages that are not available anymore get deleted - once at the start of CD1 and then again at the end of CD1. Pressing Ignore a couple of times allows to continue. Bug 153135
  • The partitioner is broken in some cases Bug 151947. which might result in:
    • mixed up filesystem types - for example one chooses ext2 and the partition is getting formatted with reiserfs
    • creates double or totally obscure entries within the fstab of the system
    • makes inproper proposals for a standard partitioning
  • Download of Release Notes will fail.
  • The online test with download of Updates will fail.
  • The second part of the installation is done in text mode Bug 153066, but afterwards the graphical login manager is started.
  • X11 configuration during installation is totally broken in Beta5 due to a bug in package manager. Instead of the native X11 driver fbdev or even vesa driver will be configured. In order to create a valid X11 configuration stop xdm ("rcxdm stop") and use SaX2 for configuration ("sax2 -r"). ATI users should update the radeon driver first before executing SaX2. Otherwise the result will likely be a blank screen. Driver RPMs for i386/x86_64 are attached to Bug 153367 and are also on the ftp server in the fixed rpm directory.

Now I love betas, you know I do. I've been installing and testing linux betas for several years now, so I expect breakage. Sometimes it's so minor that some betas are more stable and usable than other's full releases. Some are comical or entertaining. But most of SUSE's latest betas should have delayed release until they are fixed, most notably the partitioner. Not that I got bit by that one myself, but worse case scenario, it could render someone's system inoperable or even result in data loss. However, giving credit where due, at least they advise the user and surely no one in their right mind would try to upgrade to or install this beta as their main system.

I'm not sure why they'd even want to release when their crowning jewel, YAST, is so broken. This seems to me like a bad judgement call. In addition, having the xconfig broken during install would be a definite brickwall to some. Vesa implementation would not be the end of the world, in fact with my video card it's the best choice with a lot of systems, but my install didn't even address X configuration. It was skipped altogether here. As such my first boot halted and hung at the point at which it would normally try to start the graphical login manager. It should have failed and left me at the command prompt. I ctrl+alt+del'd and restarted using init 3 to get to the commandline, at which point I installed the "fixed rpm" and ran xorgconfig. Next I ran startx and got in.

        

Another "most annoying bugs" of this beta's installer was the second stage in text form. They classify it text, I use the term "ascii-graphical." This isn't so much an annoyance as entertainment to me. I've always kinda marvelled at SUSE's text installer. It is almost a carbon copy of their beautiful graphical installer - only in text. I don't imagine there are too many people who appreciate that as much as I, but I have to wonder how much work was originally put into that considering how it compares to Slackware's and others. So, having to finish in text mode wasn't an annoyance here, in fact I enjoyed it, but it's an indication of how broken things really are.

One of the "most annoying bugs" for me is that any installation method other than straight "5 burned cds" is totally broken. I hate to contribute to the pollution problem and empty my own pocket in the process as well, so I first attempted a harddrive install which would error out before probing of the mouse. Next I tried the dvd remaster, but it would bomb out just when it was supposed to begin the package installation. Harddrive installs have been officially broken for the last two betas, but truth be known, it's been broken this whole beta cycle. I could coax a hard drive install from betas 1 - 3, but I had to walk all the way around the barn to do it. In actuality, all manual installation methods are broken. In fact, their "one path to installtion" had several packages fail to install properly. I hope they get that one fixed pronto!

I noted above that most of the "Most Annoying Bugs" are still present in this beta, however if you examine the changelog you'll find the developers were not taking the week off. They have been busy fixing a lot of bugs and working hard hard hard on yast2. In fact, yast seems to dominate the changelog this time.

Although the package manager is still broken on several levels, it is coming along. Now we can see that we have the choice of our "Selections" and the catagories show up, albeit twice. However at this point the individual packages did not. The Software Catalog allowed me to add a repository, retained it this time, and then the indivdual packages appeared. However it was not usable as I still couldn't install any additional packages. This rendered setting up extra hardware inoperative if it required additional packages.

        

        

Two of the required packages for xgl was included this time, but two still need to be downloaded from a "Factory" repository. rpm at the commandline still works, so it's possible to install these packages. The xgl and compiz packages are in the suse/i586 directory of your cd5. libsvg can be downloaded here and libsvg-cairo can be had from here. I followed the directions from SUSE, but I wasn't successful in implementing this feature at this time. I may keep pluggin' away at it, but if anyone else has had better luck, feel free to submit your screenshots.

If you're interested in the lastest version number of your favorite application, you can consult the complete package list or my rpmlist as tested. I usually install everything considered desktop and developer related. I usually skip the advanced servers, xen, and mobile computing.

All in all, I'm of the opinion that betas 4 and 5 should have been delayed until less things are broken. I have a friend who has called SUSE "the new Mandrake" more than once. And I agree. We mean that in the sense of, ...do you remember when Mandrake was innovative, bold, even groundbreaking? They were the first to implement new technology and were always on the cutting edge. Their hardware support was always the very best. SUSE is "the new Mandrake" but we wish they didn't stick to their release roadmap so stringently. Sometimes it is best to delay.

Not too many new screenshots were taken this time, as the interface remained unchanged. You might want to peruse the beta 3 shots for a more complete overview or even the beta 4 if you're interested in the progress of the Software Management.

Previous coverage:


Well done

Congrats for the speed! (You've got much more time than me! Smile )

The most annoying remaining issue should be:
"Adding a new installation source does not work."

The good thing is that Factory is supposed to work.
The bad thing is that it doesn't seem trivial to get new things to work (xgl).

Re: Well done

Béranger wrote:

Congrats for the speed! (You've got much more time than me! Smile )

It'd been out sooner if I hadn't spent my Sunday replacing my son's motherboard and trying to get his windows installs to adjust. What a mess windows is!

Quote:

The most annoying remaining issue should be:
"Adding a new installation source does not work."

Yep, that's bad. But they're making progress. [/quote]

Quote:

The good thing is that Factory is supposed to work.
The bad thing is that it doesn't seem trivial to get new things to work (xgl).

Yeah, the steps seemed quite straightforward and easy to follow, it just didn't work out this time for me.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More in Tux Machines

today's howtos

Graphics: VC4 and AMDVLK Driver

  • VC4 display, VC5 kernel submitted
    For VC5, I renamed the kernel driver to “v3d” and submitted it to the kernel. Daniel Vetter came back right away with a bunch of useful feedback, and next week I’m resolving that feedback and continuing to work on the GMP support. On the vc4 front, I did the investigation of the HDL to determine that the OLED matrix applies before the gamma tables, so we can expose it in the DRM for Android’s color correction. Stefan was also interested in reworking his fencing patches to use syncobjs, so hopefully we can merge those and get DRM HWC support in mainline soon. I also pushed Gustavo’s patch for using the new core DRM infrastructure for async cursor updates. This doesn’t simplify our code much yet, but Boris has a series he’s working on that gets rid of a lot of custom vc4 display code by switching more code over to the new async support.
  • V3D DRM Driver Revised As It Works To Get Into The Mainline Kernel
    Eric Anholt of Broadcom has sent out his revised patches for the "V3D" DRM driver, which up until last week was known as the VC5 DRM driver. As explained last week, the VC5 driver components are being renamed to V3D since it ends up supporting more than just VC5 with Broadcom VC6 hardware already being supported too. Eric is making preparations to get this VideoCore driver into the mainline Linux kernel and he will then also rename the VC5 Gallium3D driver to V3D Gallium3D.
  • AMDVLK Driver Gets Fixed For Rise of the Tomb Raider Using Application Profiles
    With last week's release of Rise of the Tomb Raider on Linux ported by Feral Interactive, when it came to Radeon GPU support for this Vulkan-only Linux game port the Mesa RADV driver was supported while the official AMDVLK driver would lead to GPU hangs. That's now been fixed. With the latest AMDVLK/XGL source code as of today, the GPU hang issue for Rise of the Tomb Raider should now be resolved.

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Linux Performance Boosted By Updated BIOS/AGESA

With last week's initial launch-day Linux benchmarks of the Ryzen 5 2600X / Ryzen 7 2700X some found the Linux performance to be lower than Windows. While the root cause is undetermined, a BIOS/AGESA update does appear to help the Linux performance significantly at least with the motherboard where I've been doing most of my tests with the Ryzen 7 2700X. Here are the latest benchmark numbers. Read more

GNU: The GNU C Library 2.28 and Guix on Android

  • Glibc 2.28 Upstream Will Build/Run Cleanly On GNU Hurd
    While Linux distributions are still migrating to Glibc 2.27, in the two months since the release changes have continued building up for what will eventually become the GNU C Library 2.28. The Glibc 2.28 work queued thus far isn't nearly as exciting as all the performance optimizations and more introduced with Glibc 2.27, but it's a start. Most notable at this point for Glibc 2.28 is that it will now build and run cleanly on GNU/Hurd without requiring any out-of-tree patches. There has been a ton of Hurd-related commits to Glibc over the past month.
  • Guix on Android!
    Last year I thought to myself: since my phone is just a computer running an operating system called Android (or Replicant!), and that Android is based on a Linux kernel, it's just another foreign distribution I could install GNU Guix on, right? It turned out it was absolutely the case. Today I was reminded on IRC of my attempt last year at installing GNU Guix on my phone. Hence this blog post. I'll try to give you all the knowledge and commands required to install it on your own Android device.
  • GNU Guix Wrangled To Run On Android
    The GNU Guix transactional package manager can be made to run on Android smartphones/tablets, but not without lots of hoops to jump through first.