Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Monetary Damages for FOSS License Non-Compliance:

Filed under
OSS
Legal

In Jacobsen v. Katzer, the Federal Circuit held that open source licenses are indeed licenses and not merely contracts.1 This is an important decision due to the remedies available under the Copyright Act versus contract law. But what do monetary damages under U.S. copyright law look like? More specifically, how much could an OSS license non-compliance action cost a company that loses such a suit? Two lawyers endeavoured to answer just that question in a presentation in mid-May at the Open Source Business Conference in San Francisco. Jeffery Norman and Vladimir Khodosh of Kirkland & Ellis outlined the various sources of monetary remedies for FOSS license non-compliance, with a particular focus on the ability to recover a portion of the infringer’s profits.

Under contract law, the non-breaching party may recover actual damages. The general goal is to put the non-breaching party in as good a position as he would have been had the contract been performed. But what reasonably foreseeable damages could be expected to be recovered when the software was obtained for no monetary cost?

rest here




More in Tux Machines

Today in Techrights

Linux and Graphics

today's howtos

Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS Delayed Until February 2, Will Bring Linux 4.8, Newer Mesa

If you've been waiting to upgrade your Ubuntu 16.04 LTS (Xenial Xerus) operating system to the 16.04.2 point release, which should have hit the streets a couple of days ago, you'll have to wait until February 2. We hate to give you guys bad news, but Canonical's engineers are still working hard these days to port all the goodies from the Ubuntu 16.10 (Yakkety Yak) repositories to Ubuntu 16.04 LTS, which is a long-term supported version, until 2019. These include the Linux 4.8 kernel packages and an updated graphics stack based on a newer X.Org Server version and Mesa 3D Graphics Library. Read more