Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Debian 6.0: LXDE Menus

Filed under
Linux
Software

Let me say up front that I like the LXDE desktop. It's clean, and more importantly, it's fast -- those applications which were sluggish under KDE 4 really zip under LXDE. So I'm willing to invest some effort to make this work.

And a good thing, too, because customizing the LXDE Start Menu is a real treasure hunt, with a shortage of clues (documentation).

When I installed LXDE from the Debian repository, it started right up, and its Start Menu had the usual default categories (Accessories, Games, Internet, Office, and so on). And most of my applications were in the correct categories. But a few were missing, such as Claws (my email client), and I wanted to create some new categories. No problem; I expect to do this with any new system.

rest here




LXDE menu is OpenBox menu

LXDE is the Display Environment, OpenBox is the Window Manager, for those searching for the answers to this problem. Check out the OpenBox menus.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More in Tux Machines

grep-2.21 released [stable]

This is to announce grep-2.21, a stable release. There have been 94 commits by 3 people in the 25 weeks since 2.20. Read more Also: GNU Parallel 20141122 ('Rosetta') released

SUSE invests in software-defined storage

SUSE, the enterprise Linux company, is working on its own storage solution using open-source Ceph: SUSE Storage. Read more

Linux 3.18-rc6

Steady progress towards final release, although we still have a big unknown worry in a regression that Dave Jones reported and that we haven't solved yet. In the process of chasing that one down, there's been a fair amount of looking at various low-level details, and that found some dubious issues, but no smoking gun yet. But that explains some of the patches in rc6.. Read more

Open Source Code Contains Fewer Defects, But There's a Catch

Research suggests that software developed using open source code contains fewer defects than that built with proprietary code. The catch is that open source code rarely benefits from security teams specifically tasked with looking for bugs. Read more