Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Eight new patches from Microsoft

Filed under
Microsoft
Security

Microsoft will release eight Patches For Windows, Office, Exchange, and MSN Messenger, at least half of which will be marked "critical."

The Patches will hit on the same day that Microsoft turns off its automatic blocking of Windows XP Service Pack 2 (SP2), which many companies applied last year when the OS revision released.

According to information posted on Microsoft's Security Bulletin Advance Notification website, five of the eight fixes will be For Windows, and one each For Office, Exchange, and MSN Messenger.

Microsoft doesn't hand out details of its upcoming Patches when it makes monthly pre-announcements, so the exact nature of the fixes are unknown. The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) database, however, lists a pair of unresolved Office vulnerabilities -- one with InfoPath, the other relating to bypassing policies that limit access to hidden drives by browsing from Office applications -- and one unpatched Exchange issue.

Third-party security firms give other hints of the upcoming patches, although most play it close to the chest. eEye Digital Security, For instance, is a frequent discoverer of Microsoft Windows vulnerabilities, but doesn't disclose details until Patches are made public. It does, however, tally the number of vulnerabilities it's found that have not yet been fixed, and marks the number of days since it provided that information to the vendor.

eEye currently lists two vulnerabilities in Windows that it's tagged as "high severity." One was given to Microsoft on 16 March, the second on 29 March.

Microsoft also said that it would continue the practice of updating its Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool by releasing a new version. Two other high-priority updates For Windows will also be posted to the Windows Update site, said Microsoft, although these are not security related.

Source.

More in Tux Machines

Fedora 25 Review: A Stable Release, But Slightly Slow to Boot (on rotational disks)

If you have a rotational disk, then Fedora 25 will be a little slow to boot and there is nothing you or I can do to fix it. But if you have an SSD, then you shall have no issues here. Other than that, I’m quite pleased with this release actually. Sure the responsiveness sucked the first time on, but as mentioned, it can be fixed, permanently. And the stability is also excellent. While I’m not a huge fan of the GNOMEShell (I think it’s stupid!), the ‘Classic’ session is also available, nonetheless. If you fancy giving it a go, then get it from here, but first make sure to read the release notes. Read more

KDE Leftovers

Parental Controls for Linux Unleashed

For years, one of the overlooked areas for the Linux desktop was access to “effective” parental controls. Back in 2003, I remember the now defunct Linspire (then known as Lindows) offered a proprietary option called SurfSafe. Surprisingly, at least back then, the product worked very well in providing accurate content filtering capabilities; something that was not,in fact, available and easy-to-use at that time. Years later, an open-source alternative was released to the greater Linux community known as GNOME Nanny. Fantastic in terms of usage control, its web content web filter was laughably terrible. As expected, crowd-sourcing a filtering list isn’t a great solution. And like SurfSafe, the project is now defunct. Read more

Chapeau 24 Cancellara - Same same but different

Fedora plus Moka icons plus some extra software, mainly coming from proprietary sources. I guess that's the best way to describe Chapeau. But then, what separates one distro from another if not a collection of decorations, as software is essentially the same, apart from a very small number of standalone distributions trying to develop their own identity with their own desktop environments and app stack, re: elementary or Solus + Budgie? Except they struggle, too. Chapeau 24 is a nice effort to make Fedora friendlier, but then it does not achieve the needed result without pain. The biggest issues included a botched smartphone support. Samba woes and the horrible bootloader bug. Other than that, it behaved more or less the same way as the parent distro. Then again, why bother if you can pimp up Fedora without any loss of functionality? I do like Chapeau Cancellara, but I cannot ignore the fact Fedora does the same with fewer problems. All in all, it's a welcome effort, but it needs more polish. It does not quite capture the heart the way Fuduntu did. And with some issues looming high above the distro, the grade can only be about 6/10. Most importantly, the bootloader setup must be flawless, and there's not excuse for small app errors that we've seen. We know it can do more. Anyhow, if you're not keen on any self-service round Fedora, this could be a good test bed for your games. A moderately worthy if somewhat risky and flawed experience. Read more