Will Linux’s Hardware Requirements Stifle Its Acceptance?

Linux’s ability to run on old or budget hardware has long been a popular talking point among free software advocates. Yet in recent years, the system requirements of mainstream desktop Linux distributions have been skyrocketing. At the same time, Windows 8 is slated to demand fewer resources than its predecessors. What could this mean for Linux? Here are some thoughts.
Before we get ahead of ourselves — and I get flamed for spreading FUD — let’s state the obvious: Linux still can be plenty friendly to old or otherwise “slow” computers. The Damn Small Linux distribution, for example, can be installed in full on as little as 50MB of disk space, and run perfectly well on a 486 processor — with a graphical user interface. It’s not the Linux kernel that’s become resource-hungry, but the distributions that are built on top of it.
In addition, system requirements are always a fuzzy thing.
-
- Login or register to post comments
Printer-friendly version
- 3331 reads
PDF version
More in Tux Machines
- Highlights
- Front Page
- Latest Headlines
- Archive
- Recent comments
- All-Time Popular Stories
- Hot Topics
- New Members
Openwashing Apple and Microsoft Proprietary Frameworks/Services
| Viperr Linux Keeps Crunchbang Alive with a Fedora Flair
Do you remember Crunchbang Linux? Crunchbang (often referred to as #!) was a fan-favorite, Debian-based distribution that focused on using a bare minimum of resources. This was accomplished by discarding the standard desktop environment and using a modified version of the Openbox Window Manager. For some, Crunchbang was a lightweight Linux dream come true. It was lightning fast, easy to use, and hearkened back to the Linux of old.
|
Openwashing Cars
| today's leftovers
|
Recent comments
16 hours 25 min ago
16 hours 52 min ago
1 day 4 hours ago
1 day 5 hours ago
2 days 30 min ago
2 days 1 hour ago
3 days 5 hours ago
4 days 9 hours ago
5 days 16 hours ago
1 week 1 hour ago