Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Looking at the computer experience

Filed under
Linux

I want to start at the basics. Just like when I first went to computer networking classes and we worked on Novell Netware. Yeah, it's been awhile.

Question, what is a computer?

Answer, a computer is the material components connected together to perform specific tasks. ie... motherboard, memory, processor, video card, usb ports, serial ports, monitor, printer, mouse, keyboard, etc...

Question, what is an operating system?

Answer, an operating system is a collection of software that allows all the material components of a computer to communicate and interact. It creates an environment in which other software applications are able to interact with the computer in order to perform their intended purpose.

Question, what is an application?

Answer, a software application is software that works to allow a person or another program to perform tasks. It interacts with the operating system and the computer to complete those tasks. ie.. a word processing application allows users to type on a computer as if it were a typewriter then perform other tasks for editing, storing and/or printing those document files.

Now as I was going through my training as a network technician/administrator those years ago, our world, as network folks, dealt primarily with the computer and the operating system. Few end user apps really held much interest or use for us except where they related to connectivity, network access, etc...

Back then, Windows was still in DOS and by the time I was done, Windows for Workgroups 3.11 was the new thing.

Believe it or not, Netware wasn't altogether too different from Linux in my opinion. It was all command line, you had dang well better make sure your syntax was correct and people still complained that Windows wasn't playing nicely.

Back then we talked about our role as support providers for users on a network. What do people "do" on a computer?

People need to access or "log in".

People need to create and store files locally and on remote network servers.

People need to access services and devices both locally and remotely such as printers.

Back then, there was somewhat of a divide between systems. Local computers were said to run a Disk Operating System. Servers ran Network Operating Systems.

Local computers ran Windows or Apple. They were focused on the GUI and that's what the typical user saw and interacted with.

Servers ran Unix or Netware or the like and were command line oriented and it was considered a digital sin to suggest using a GUI on a server.

Now Linux is based on Minix which is based on Unix which is historically known as a network or server operating system.
My perspective is that Linux is suffering from the same problem as Windows and even Apple to a degree, but mostly Windows which is trying to be everything to everyone. Essentially, it wants to be the powerhouse, stable and reliable server operating system but be a user oriented, local machine operating system at the same time.

Let's go way back to mainframe days for a minute. The server operating system had to be a multi-user system by the nature of it's design and implementation. Lot's of people sitting at dumb terminals all logged in to the server and frequently, the same apps, at the same time.

Windows came in and initially, reversed that. One computer meant one user at a time. There was no way you were going to log in multiple users simultaneously. MS had to adapt Windows as it went along when they realized that the "one computer, one person" rule they had set wasn't going to be sufficient.

Linux is coming from the opposite direction. It has multi-user access natively built into it. It IS a server OS before it is anything else. The adaptions have to come from the single user end for Linux.

Hundreds of Linux distributions have been created trying to make that ideal mashup of Linux into a single user like OS.

Why do people use computers? To do things, to complete tasks. What aspect of the computer do people interact with the most? The apps that allow them to do those tasks.

Linux needs apps. You might say that Linux has apps, thousands, tens of thousands of them. You would be correct. At the same time, Linux developers who want Linux to be used by people other than technicians and developers need to understand that the average user wants "pizazz".

Finally, we have some apps that are nearing that goal. Open/Libre Office is one for example. Thunderbird, chrome, firefox. We need more however, many more.

In terms of solving the ideal single-user system for Linux, I think Android has the ticket. They make use of the powerhouse capabilities of the server operating system, but only show the user the stuff they want to use, the apps.

A smartphone is not a laptop or desktop and people like to keep familiar things familiar. The efforts by many developers to turn desktops into smartphone look-alikes is going to backfire because end users are usually smart enough to know they are not using a phone.

To be honest, I don't think Linux will hit it's desktop "sweet spot" until the main user interface/menu is voice driven and frees the monitor real estate up to show the user only the apps they tell the computer they want to see.

More in Tux Machines

KDE/Qt: Qt 3D, Kube/Kolab, GSoC, and Atelier (3-D Printing)

  • What a mesh!
    With all the advances being made in Qt 3D, we wanted to create some new examples showing some of what it can do. To get us started, we decided to use an existing learning framework, so we followed the open source Tower Defence course, which you can find at CGCookie. Being a game, it allows an interactive view of everything at work, which is very useful.
  • Last week in Kube
    Perhaps if Windows wasn’t such a PITA there would be more progress
  • GSoC 2018: Week 4 & 5
    The last 2 weeks were mainly dedicatd for reviews and testing and thanks to my mentors, I passed the first evaluation with good work till now. Some significant changes were made on discussion with my mentors during the last 2 weeks in the code and some new features.
  • Giving Atelier some Love
    I work for atelier together with Chris, Lays and Patrick for quite a while, but I was basically being the “guardian angel” of the project being invocked when anything happened or when they did not know how to proceed (are you a guardian angel of a project? we have many that need that) For instance I’v done the skeleton for the plugin system, the buildsystem and some of the modules in the interface, but nothing major as I really lacked the time and also lacked a printer.

Proprietary Software on GNU/Linux

  • Winepak – Install Windows Apps and Games on Linux via Flatpak
    A reason for Linux not being more used as added in the comments section of a recent article is “Adobe and Games“. Well, there is a latest Linux bad guy in town and it is here to comfort us in a cooler way than Wine.
  • Mark Text Markdown Editor Adds Sidebar And Tabs Support
    Mark Text is a somewhat new free and open source Electron Markdown editor for Windows, Mac and Linux, which supports the CommonMark Spec and the GitHub Flavored Markdown Spec. The app features a seamless live preview using Snabbdom as the render engine, multiple edit modes (Typewriter, Source Code and Focus), includes code fence support, light and drak themes, emoji auto-completion, and export to PDF, HTML or styled HTML.
  • Google’s VR180 Creator Makes It Easier to Edit VR Video on Linux
    It’s called “VR180 Creator” (catchy) and the tool aims to make it easier for people to edit video shot on 180-degree and 360-degree devices like the Lenovo Mirage camera (pictured opposite). And boy is just-such a tool needed! VR180 Creator: Easier VR Video Editing Editing VR video is, to be perfectly frank, a pain in the rump end. So by releasing this new, open-source tool for free Google is being rather smart.Anything that makes it easier for consumers and content creators to edit VR on something other than a high-end specialist rig is going to help the format flourish.

Devuan GNU+Linux 2.0.0 "ASCII"

When I am trying out a desktop distribution, what really tends to divide the field of Linux distributions in my mind is not whether the system uses MATE or Plasma, or whether the underlying package manager uses RPM or Deb files. What tends to leave a lasting impression with me is whether the desktop environment, its applications and controls feel like a cooperative, cohesive experience or like a jumble of individual tools that happen to be part of the same operating system. In my opinion Ubuntu running the Unity desktop and Linux Mint's Cinnamon desktop are good examples of the cohesive approach. The way openSUSE's administration tools work together provides another example. Like them or hate them, I think most people can see there is an overall design, a unifying vision, being explored with those distributions. I believe Devuan falls into the other category, presenting the user with a collection of utilities and features where some assembly is still required. This comes across in little ways. For example, many distributions ship Mozilla's Firefox web browser and the Thunderbird e-mail client together as a set, and they generally complement each other. Devuan ships Firefox, but then its counterpart is the mutt console e-mail program which feels entirely out of place with the rest of the desktop software. The PulseAudio sound mixing utility is included, but its system tray companion is not present by default. Even the system installer, which switches back and forth between graphical windows and a text console, feels more like a collection of uncoordinated prompts rather than a unified program or script. Some people may like the mix-and-match approach, but I tend to prefer distributions where it feels like the parts are fitted together to create a unified experience. What I found was that Devuan provided an experience where I had to stop and think about where items were or how I was going to use them rather than having the pieces seamlessly fit together. However, once I got the system set up in a way that was more to my liking, I appreciated the experience provided. Devuan offers a stable, flexible platform. Once I shaped the operating system a little, I found it to be fast, light and capable. Having a fairly large repository of software available along with Flatpak support provided a solid collection of applications on a conservative operating system foundation. It was a combination I liked. In short, I think Devuan has some rough edges and setting it up was an unusually long and complex experience by Linux standards. I certainly wouldn't recommend Devuan to newcomers. However, a day or two into the experience, Devuan's stability and performance made it a worthwhile journey. I think Devuan may be a good alternative to people who like running Debian or other conservative distributions such as Slackware. I suspect I may soon be running Devuan's Raspberry Pi build on my home server where its lightweight nature will be welcome. Read more Also: deepin 15.6 Released With New Features: Get This Beautiful Linux Distro Here

Android Leftovers